Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Leadership its principles and dynamics
Leadership its principles and dynamics
Leadership its principles and dynamics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Dynamics of Leadership First of all, I would like to define leadership by quoting Chester I. Barnard: “Leadership is the quality of behavior of individuals whereby they guide people or their activities in organising efforts”. In my opinion this statement is absolutely true and explains the term in its best way. Therefore, it would be logical to state that leader is the person who is at the center of the power structure of the group, the one who keeps everyone in the group together, forms the goals and motivates people to achieve those goals. Leadership is a very influential chain of actions. Only leader is to shape and regulate, control and change various things inside the group like attitude, behavioral norms, and performance. Mostly, leaders …show more content…
are the ones who do not lack knowledge, experience and information, and they are charismatic and skillful. Smart decision-making and skillful use of own powers are likely to bring success and power. The true leader in my opinion was our 34th President – Dwight David Eisenhower. Eisenhower started his military career in the U.S. Military Academy. During his service in Panama he was introduced to General Fox Conner who eventually taught him basics of being a leader and motivated to read more history, military science, as well as philosophy. That is when the first leadership mastering efforts took place. By the 1929 he met General Douglas MacArthur in Philippines and was his assistant advisor. Together with MacArthur Eisenhower had to develop the viable Filipino Army. During this hard process of learning and using the skills which were mastered during the training in Military academy, together with personal knowledge made Eisenhower good advisor for the leader MacArthur. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor it was time for Dwight D. Eisenhower to be in charge of plans for the Pacific War. Excellent commanding, great brains and skillfulness helped Eisenhower to get promoted to the position of the Chief of the Was Plans Division. He received his second star of general at that moment. In 1942 Eisenhower’s reputation sent him to England where he was on a mission to cooperate with Allies as a Commanding General. It took a lot of courage and devotion to his country and self sacrifice to be separated from Eisenhower’s family up until the end of the War in European Region. For about 20 years millions of lives were in Eisenhower’s hands. During the World War II, Eisenhower – the Supreme Allied Commander, organized the largest air as well as sea armadas in the history and had around 160 thousand people in command during the Operation Overlord. The tremendous success made the popular leader rise even higher in people’s eyes and he gained even more respect from military commanders. He was envied and admired. Eisenhower proved himself as successful leader in each position. Of course besides the triumphs he made mistakes. The outstanding feature of his character was that even despite mistakes he continued to lead his people to success. He was described as the one with curious mind, and iron clad sense of the self-confidence. Those features gave him strength to stand tall despite the weight of the world on shoulders. He boldly made critical decisions. When people were asked what was the first thing which came to their mind after hearing “Eisenhower” was trust. He was trusted to the make the right choice. Admirable qualities were dedication to principles and loyalty. Eisenhower said: “Morale is born of loyalty, patriotism, discipline, and efficiency, all of which breed confidence in self and in comrades…Morale is at one and the same time the strongest, and the most delicate of growths. It withstands shocks, even disasters of the battlefield, but can be destroyed utterly by favoritism, neglect, or injustice”. Dwight D.
Eisenhower as a true leader made his men work hard every day; he taught them about not cutting corners and pushing themselves to always do their best. He was able to listen to every one of his men and inspire them. Eisenhower apart from being a great commander was a great person as well. He loved his life and he had love for people. Not for once Eisenhower thought of his men as numbers or pins which were moved constantly across the map of the World. What made him memorable leader is that he thought of every person as individual. The feeling was mutual: many men enjoyed the meeting with General and wished him all the best. The worst for Eisenhower was to see his men as faceless mass. All the decision making and wars caused pressure for Eisenhower. He was also in charge of political and logistical problems which took concentration and good knowledge during the war days. He was very hardworking and example for his men. The stress made him come to the conclusion that despite how hard the situation might be it is important to stay positive and open minded. Optimism showed two benefits for Eisenhower during his commanding years. The first benefit was to be hopeful around others and others would do the same, and the second one was about being less demoralized. Dwight Eisenhower was a man who never esteemed or placed himself too highly above his men, on whom he deeply relied. He was modest and hated being praised. Good thing about Eisenhower leadership was always to put …show more content…
“why” behind what he asked his men to do. By doing that he kept them motivated and that gave men strengths when they needed it. He knew how hard the conditions are during the war because of his frequent “trips” to the battle front. To say that Dwight D. Eisenhower was popular during the period after World War II would be to say nothing. Eisenhower was the only one among presidents of the post-war period who had more positive rather negatives feedbacks up until the day he died. Dwight David Eisenhower was good in maintaining the support from his people but unfortunately after 15 years in White House he was judged and called the lackluster leader. He was called bland, with good nature and well intentions. He was passive and politically inept. Most people thought he had minimalist view on the subject of leadership and leader’s responsibilities. He succeeded in achieving the valuable political resource – inescapable public support, although this support was more of a legacy after the World War II leadership as supreme commander. Such a great contrast to the Eisenhower during the war times. Eisenhower always carried out his leadership strategies.
He exercised political influence via intermediaries. He was artful and in command of language, he dealt better during the private communications. Eisenhower never criticized anyone and showed sympathies towards his opponents. The organizational leadership was marked as well. Eisenhower instituted more structured forum for discussion of foreign affairs which caused the expand of the National Security Council. I think that supreme quality for leadership is integrity. It shows how deeply the person is committed to do right things for good purposes and reasons despite all the circumstances which come along. Dwight D. Eisenhower was exactly the person who I can call a great leader. Not only the sense of integrity was present in his vision, but there also were courage, creativity, fairness, trust, humility and understanding. He led the masses and gained the appreciation
respectively. In the end I would like to say that it took a lot of devotion and nerve to be that great in military. The dedication is very valuable feature in people and as for me it is quite rare nowadays. My research showed that throughout whole Eisenhower’s life he was a man of honor and openness, he was a symbol of unity as president and as well as commander. Eisenhower’s life experience teaches us that even leader do mistakes and wrong choices. Eisenhower was a great military man but not so great as a president, even though he had the support he needed. I believe mistakes make us better and teach us life that is why it is essential for a true leader to go through all the harshness of this world and to experience different things. The great leaders are not the ones who were born that way, the great leaders are the ones who lived their lives and learned.
Miller Center. (2009, May). American President: A reference resource. Retrieved November 2, 2011, from University of Virgina: http://millercenter.org/president/eisenhower/essays/biography/print
The basis of the speech is to achieve peace in the world and warn the nation for not being excited with the prosperous state and not living for the moment in the youth and glamour while aiming for an easy life. According to him, there are big chances that the power will be misplaced and this might persist, but the nation must strive for a balance between the freedom and democratic processes. I think the standpoint of Eisenhower is not consistent with that of a military man as he wants the expenditure on the defense strategies to be lessened and wants to promote the growth of the country by sparing the federal funds on other things than national defense. He believes that the country cannot risk the emergency improvisation, which is required for national defense. He said that “the country is compelled to create permanent armaments of vast proportions”.
leader. He won the hearts of people because he could relate to them and their
into the Eisenhower presidency, gave rise to hopes of a more flexible, accommodating Soviet leadership. In 1953, Eisenhower delivered a speech underscoring the potential human cost of the Cold War to both sides. Hoping to strike a more compatible tone with Georgi. Malenkov, Stalin's successor, Eisenhower suggested the Soviets cease their brazen expansion of territory and influence in exchange for American cooperation and goodwill. The Soviets responded coolly to the speech.
...large step towards world peace, thus this is way I believe he was an effective visionary leader.
War 2. It appears that his leadership helped to make the feeling of the country
Arguably one of the greatest generals in American history Douglas MacArthur was born to be in the military, his father Arthur MacArthur was a great soldier who honorably in the Army and it MacArthur went to West Point to follow in his father's footsteps. MacArthur served for rising through the ranks at a rapid pace, he became most well known for his leadership during the second world war but after that he led his troops on the battlefields of Korea in his seventies. Although MacArthur proved to be a brilliant general, his aggressive decisions towards the end of the Korean War led to his honorable removal as general of the United Nations Army and his heroic actions and tales to be cemented permanently in American History.
Dwight D. Eisenhower’s strong and experienced leadership in the United States military was the main contribution of him becoming one of the greatest and mot successful presidents. Born on October 14, 1890, Dwight D. Eisenhower had a role of leadership. During his high school career he was a leader on the baseball and football field. Once he graduated high school he took off from school for to years to go work with his uncle and father at the Bell Springs Creamery and worked as a fire fighter. He acted as a leader by using his money to help pay for his brothers tuition for college. In 1911, Dwight was accepted into West Point Academy, this was the start of his military career that would take him far in his life.
As a child, Eisenhower outshined many classmates in school and received an invitation to attend West Point, a prominent military academy in New York. After joining the army, he was quickly promoted because of his hard work and dedication (The White House). Eisenhower always respected authority and looked up to higher ranking officers. He developed friendships with some of them, and this helped him greatly in his military school. While serving in Panama, he met General Fox Connor who helped him gain admission from the Command and General Staff School in Kansas (Eisenhower Presidential Library and Museum). After this, he served as a military aide to General John J. Pershing for seven years. When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941, U.S. Army Chief of Staff General George C. Marshall called him to work as a planning officer in Washington, D.C. In November 1942, Eisenhower headed Operation Torch, the Allied assault of North Africa (History.com).
Dwight David Eisenhower also know as “Ike” served as the 34th President of the United States. Ike was elected on January 20, 1953 and left January 20th, 1961. He was born on October fourteenth in Denison Texas, then passed away March twenty- eighth 1969 in Washington D.C. After he was born in Texas, his family and him moved to Abilene Kansas, the Eisenhower family was poor but Ike worked throughout his childhood to work to earn money. He was the third of the seven children, they all were raised by David Jacob Eisenhower who was a mechanic and manager, and Ida Elizabeth Stover, who was a religious pacifist.
In 1953 Dwight ran for Presidency against Adlai Stevenson. winning by a landslide. His presidency lasted 2 terms. Dwight was at the age of 62 when he was elected the oldest president to be elected. One of his main points was to build a interstate system. because of the looming cold war in a war where large city’s would be targets. he thought it would be a good way to help with the evac of the large city’s and would aid in military movement throughout the country. he also started NASA as a civilian space program. on March 28, 1969 at the age of 78 Dwight D Eisenhower died from congestive heart failure. Dwight was a man that was looked up to, he was a great man, a great president, a great gen and he was also so much more.
Other than having such great communication skills and friendliness towards all his people, he had an amazing inner reserve and impenetrable iron will. His admirers emphasized the way in which he met the nation's problems and would praise the way he would often insist that the federal government needed to help with the underprivileged as well as the United States must share in the responsibility for preserving world peace. Franklin Roosevelt made many a great impact upon his times and his policies proved to exert great influence on the future. Being able to provide people with faith throughout the great depression and hard times that would follow during his presidency, and uplift the country was just one of the traits that proved him to be a great leader.
When he had a goal he accomplished it all thoroughly with no loose ends left to spare. Eisenhower was a
Linden, R. M. (2006, November/December). Dwight Eisenhower: Portrait of a Collaborative Leader. Virginia Review, 6. Retrieved December 3, 2013
“Leadership is an influence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes that reflect their mutual purposes” (Rost, 1931). But in today’s time, the styles of leadership are changed every time a new technology is invented or discovered so there is lack of persistency. The only thing which manages to stay constant is the principles of carrying out business activities. There are philosophies and ideologies on leadership which can be used in any time period as they are mostly a reflection of the principles of leadership. Theorists and authors like Hobbes (1679), Lewin (1947) and Aristotle (384–322 B.C.), in their time have produced enough material which can be put into use by modern day leaders and managers. Philosophers like Aristotle, who was known to be one of the most business-oriented and practical philosopher of his time, his work is still used by businesses today because of their relevance as he is interested in defining principles in terms of the ethics of leadership (Santa Clara University). In the essay I have tried to show how leadership has adapted to the changes around them and compared to the past and what circumstances caused need to change it. As a layman, anyone would think that the principles centuries ago will be very different to what we follow now but after studying on Hobbes, Lewin and Aristotle it has made a big impact on my way of thinking because the work produced by them still has more relevance compared to some of the work produced now. I have tried to explain the evolvement of leadership through three aspects which are psychology, sociology and philosophy.