Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection of Philippine history
Short essay about Philippines history
Essay about philippine history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Annexation in the Philippines
Imperialism is a topic that has changed world History for hundreds of years. American imperialism was a controversial topic during the late 1800’s. One of the largest pieces of American imperialism was the Spanish American War. It was fought in 1898 and won by the Americans. Early in the war there were multiple battles in Cuba, but the more relevant battles took place in the Philippines. The Filipinos had been fighting against the Spanish for multiple years before America got involved. Once America entered, the war became lopsided and they put the FIlipinos ahead of the Spanish. The Americans fought alongside the Filipinos for a handful of battles, until Manila Bay, the final battle of the war. This was the
…show more content…
start of the conflict between America and the Filipinos. This lead to the eventual annexation of the Philippines. Many Americans supported the annexation, but numerous citizens opposed it. Annexing the Philippines was wrong because The U.S betrayed them, it was hypocritical, and it was not necessary to own them for trade. It was wrong to betray the Filipinos after America fought alongside them to defeat spain. Rather than end in harmony and solace, The United States initiated further conflict. Democratic candidate William Jennings Bryan states, “we had full knowledge that they were fighting for their own independence”(Document D). He confesses that the the Americans were fully aware that the Filipinos had no intention of becoming a U.S territory. They wanted independence from any superior countries. They could have regained the power to self-govern and to control their own nation. Instead America betrayed them by not allowing them to accomplish this and forcing them back into control of a superior country. They have already been controlled by Spain for numerous years, and now they have to withstand the forces of the United States. Their goal of rebelling against spain was to regain independence for themselves. Emilio Aguinaldo a FIlipino, general wanted to march in and fight alongside the Americans in the final battle of the war, Manilla Bay. Instead the Americans let him down and fought the Spanish on their own, which was the first clue that The Unites States would annex them. America was betraying them because they should have realised the issues and removed themselves from the situation. When annexing the Philippines, America was looked at as being hypocritical.
One of the reasons for annexing the Philippines was because the United States felt it necessary to Educate the Filipinos. William Jennings Bryan, a Democratic candidate stated, “(We) dare not educate them lest they learn to read the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States and mock them for their inconsistency”(Document D). If America was to educate them they would have to use the American school curriculum. This is not right because they would be robbed of their cultures and customs of schooling. They would not be given the opportunity to decide what the youth of their country is studying. He also claims America would be mocked for their inconsistency. The U.S had just helped them fight for their country to protect their cultures and customs. In the eyes of all other countries America would be looked at as hypocrites because they are now contradicting their own actions. The Anti-Imperialist League stated, “It seeks to extinguish the spirit of 1776 in those islands”(Doc A). When The U.S annexed the Philippines they stole their spirit of 1776, as Britain tried to do to the Americans. The hypocrisy of the matter was outrageous because America had faced the same type of problem when trying to gain their own independence. Now that The United States has the upper hand they feel as if inferior forces can be controlled, such as the Philippines. America stole the amazing …show more content…
feeling the they had when they gained independence, which is wrong because the Philippines had no opportunity to experience this feeling. The level of hypocrisy during this time period was outrageous and completely ignorant. It was not necessary to annex the Philippines for trade improvement.
America was completely capable of trading with them without the annexation. William Jennings Bryan stated, “It is not necessary to own people in order to trade with them”(Document D). He says this in attempt to lure Americans away from wanting to Annex the Philippines. It is unclear as to why people think that it is crucial to own the Philippines in order to trade with them. If The U.S was to let them free to there own will, it would be more likely that the Philippines will trade with America than if they had possession of them. If America decided not to annex the Filipinos, America would have been able to peacefully trade with them rather than forcing them into trade. America trade with many other nations that are not U.S owned, it is questioned why many thought it was necessary to own the Philippines to own them. If The U.S could trade with them without going through the process of annexation, it would conserve a great deal of
money. The annexation of the Philippines was a controversial topic that americans argued for many years. It was wrong to annex them because Americans were betraying them, it was hypocritical and was not needed to for trade. America was turning on those whom they had just fought alongside and betrayed them. This would be similar to France helping the Americans fight against the british in the revolutionary war, and then taking them over after the war was over . The hypocrisy of the matter is extreme because America was in the same situation themselves and know exactly how the Philippines felt but disregarded it completely. The Annexation was completely unnecessary for trade with the Philippines. The annexation of the Philippines was incorrect and if this annexation did not happen, many other world powers may have followed in America’s footsteps and stopped Imperialism.
Blood has been spilled all over the ground of the Philippines. The United States fought a small war with Spain in 1898. The United States ended up getting Cuba and the Philippine Islands as a war prize. Cuba got their independence, but the United States decided to keep the Philippine Islands by annexing them (Background Essay). Should the United States have annexed the Philippines? Annexed means to join or combine a smaller country with a bigger country. The United States should have annexed the Philippine Islands because they needed guidance to become a better country, couldn't give the Philippine Islands to other countries, and there was nothing else the United States could do with them.
The first reason the United States should have annexed the Philippines is because it is our duty to as a country to spread the values of democracy overseas. For example, as stated here in Albert J. Beveridge’s campaign speech he says, “ Do we owe no duty to the world?… it is ours to save for liberty and civilization (Doc B).” He is saying that it is our duty as a sovereign nation to help an uncivilized nation modernize, industrialize, . another example, is from William Mcki...
Imperialism is a policy by which a country gains power over the world or other countries. It begun in 1865 and it caused US to expand. America had “Thirst for New Market”. The business in The United States was developing rapidly so it needed more supplies (trade) from other countries. The United States used different methods such as Jingoism/Racism, Economic Expansion and American superiority over Europe, but however, economic expansion contributed most for the US Imperialism. This meant more money and power compare to other countries.
In my opinion The United States ordeal with Annexing the Philippines and the idea that we had of going into war with them was great mistake and should have been avoided. The Filipinos and Americans were deadlocked in war with each other. This all became a controversy with the two nations in 1898 when the Treaty of Paris between Spain and the United Stated ceded all seven thousand islands of the Philippine archipelago to the United States, for just a mere twenty-million dollars. Congress had approved the treaty with Spain, by February of 1899. Mckinley was on the verge of calling for the annexation of the Philippines which brought on a bloody two year struggle. In my opinion the United States was the cause of all of this because of three different reasons, for one our government would not...
Throughout the course of history, nations have invested time and manpower into the colonizing and modernizing of more rural governments. Imperialism has spread across the globe, from the British East India Company to France’s occupation of Northern Africa. After their founding in 1776, the United States of America largely stayed out of this trend until The Spanish-American War of 1898. Following the war, the annexation and colonization of Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines ultimately set a precedent for a foreign policy of U.S. imperialism.
The 19th century set the stage for different policies that lead to the extending of America’s power, which is defined as imperialism. Imperialism started for different reasons like the Americans wanting the U.S. to expand or explore the unknown land, or even some feared existing resources in U.S. might eventually dry up. The reason imperialism started doesn’t really matter, but more of what it caused. Imperialism lead to Cuban assistance, the addition of Hawaii and Alaska to America, and Yellow Journalism.
The United States should not annex the Philippine islands, the Philippines, already a country of their own should not be forced to adapt to American culture and civilization. Prior to the annexation of the Philippines, America had major conflict with Spain in order to free Cuba from their brutal tactics for dominance. Tension continued to rise, until President Mckinley decided to take action and go to war against Spanish forces to enable a more stable government as well as provide protection for the citizens of Cuba. After months of fighting, the Spanish admitted defeat and began discussing peace terms of the Treaty of Paris. In this treaty Cuba was guaranteed independence, also the Spanish were forced to give up Guam and Puerto Rico. They Spanish also complied to selling the Philippines to the U.S for 20 million. However, the Filipinos wanted independence, not just a change in who governed them, this desire led many Philippine citizens to break out, beginning the Philippine- American war, which lasted three years, and caused the death of over two hundred thousand American and Filipino citizens.
In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, Imperialism was a popular trend among the large, powerful countries. Imperialism is defined as “The policy of extending a nation's authority by territorial acquisition or by the establishment of economic and political hegemony over other nations”. Imperialism cannot be said as either good or bad, but as a general rule: If you live in an annexed country, imperialism is not good, if your country annexes smaller ones to gain profit, land, and respect, then imperialism is good. The United States was not much of an imperialistic country until we won the Spanish-American war. As a result of this war, we annexed Guam, the Philippines, and Puerto Rico.
The imperialistic attitude sprung from the American Victory in the Spanish-American War. Although the Spanish-American War and the intervention in the Philippines were preceded by fifty years of meddling in Latin America, and to a lesser degree Asia and Africa, it was these two events that marked and tested a fully realized imperial policy.
The truth is I didn’t want the Philippines, and when they came to us, as a gift from the gods, I did not know what to do with them.… I sought counsel from all sides— Democrats as well as Republicans—but got little help. I thought first we would take only Manila; then Luzon; then other islands perhaps also. I walked the floor of the White House night after night until midnight; and I am not ashamed to tell you, gentlemen, that I went down on my knees and prayed Almighty God for light and guidance more than one night. And one night late it came to me this way… that we could not give them back to Spain… that we could not leave them to themselves— they were unfit for self-government… [and] that there was nothing left for us to do but to take them all, and to educate the Filipinos, and uplift and civilize and Christianize them, and by God’s grace do the very best we could by them.” (Thomas G. Paterson and Dennis
...se having more land naturally meant having more space for the immigrants and new opportunities. When business expanded, it meant having more wealth for the business owner. After the annexation of Hawaii, the natural resources were enjoyed by both America and Hawaii. Despite the fact that Hawaii was annexed during the war with Spain as a strategic move, America took great care in the expansion of the island (Thurston 1897).
Filipinos fought alongside Americans for independence just as the Americans fought for headlines. After the USS Maine exploded the press blamed Spain. Which lead the United States into to war with Spain for their cruelty towards Cubans. The Cubans and Filipinos fought alongside Americans for their freedom from Spain. Which led to the United States winning the Spanish-American war and the Rough Riders receiving credit in headlines for African Americans achievements. The U.S liberated Cuba and had a decision to make about the Philippines. Should the United States annex the Philippines? To annex an area means to add to one’s territory. The U.S should not have annexed the Philippines because it would “kill the spirit of 1776,” annexation would
In 1898, in an effort to free Cuba from the oppression of its Spanish colonizers, America captured the Philippines. This brought about questions of what America should do with the Philippines. Soon, controversy ensued both in the American political arena as well as among its citizens. Throughout its history, America had always been expansionistic, but it had always limited itself to the North American continent. Beginning in the mid-nineteenth century, however, there emerged a drive to expand outside of the continent. When America expanded to the Philippines, the policy it followed was a stark break from past forms of expansionism. Despite much controversy, America followed the example of the imperialistic nations in Europe and sought to conquer the Philippines as an imperialist colony that they would rule either directly or indirectly.
The concept of imperialism is one that has pervaded nearly every major society or empire throughout human history. It seems to be a natural consequence of societies growing in size, power, and knowledge. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries vast changes occurred in Western Europe (and soon spread elsewhere) that spurred a new round of imperialism the likes of which had not been seen before. The changes were the industrial revolution that was taking place. Countries were rapidly advancing to industrial societies producing much greater quantities of goods at much lower costs. The goods produced ranged everywhere from cotton textiles to military machinery, all of which would play important roles in rounds of imperialistic expansion that would follow. The imperialistic displays by Western European nations also brought about several other industrial revolutions in other regions including the Ottoman Empire, Russia, and Japan. I will take a look at how the industrial revolution encouraged imperialistic expansion, as well as some of the results of that expansion in other regions.
There were several policies in place at the time, some which were put into place before the war, some during the war, and some after. The ratification of the annexation process was long and difficult. There were debates as to how to treat the Filipino people. One suggestion was to treat the Filipinos as dependents, and not citizens, like the Native Americans came to be treated. Many of the imperialists believed that the Filipinos were savages and harsh policies would give America control. The anti-imperialists were not exactly sure whether to treat them as peers or to set them free. I would treat them as equals, as normal people, as they are like everyone else. At the time they might not have been as technologically advanced as we were, and their government may have seemed primitive to ours. I think we should have worked with them to help create a government, rather than occupy and just take over.