Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparing communism and capitalism
Communism in eastern europe
Comparison between communism and capitalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparing communism and capitalism
Stasiland is a non-fiction book based on author, Anna Funder’s, encounters with several East German citizens, victims of the GDR and ex-Stasi members. Anna was not of German origin, but Germany fascinated her for various reasons, one significant reason being oppression. She firmly believes that people speak out when oppressed, and it’s a natural behavior to do so. In the non-fiction book, she interacts with many people, and listens to both sides of the story. However, that does not mean she necessarily agrees with everything the people she interviewed said. Many of the ex-Stasi members had no remorse for the things they did, but some also wanted capitalism to die away and have the rebirth of communism in their country. The Stasi spied on …show more content…
Herr Winz agreed to meet her and suggests they go to a “neutral place”, a vacant hotel with almost no one around. Winz asked Funder for her ID and basically is intimidating by being sinister and behaving coldly towards her. As the conversation furthers, he never answers Funder’s questions about himself or what the Insiderkomitee did. (p.85). He kept going on and on about his socialist and communist views and how he interpreted the western media, but never specifically answered any of the questions that she said. Lastly, he had the audacity to pass The Communist Manifesto to Funder while deepening his gaze and explaining how she will understand everything a lot more once she had a read of the book. The way Winz makes her uncomfortable showed how manipulative and menacing the man really was. Despite not having any real power after the fall of the GDR, he held his head high and continued as if he had not committed any wrongdoing. This man is a bad influence on society. In this interaction, the reader is able to make out the type of man he is and the negativity surrounding his …show more content…
In this book, Funder gave us both sides of the story where the victim of the Stasi were given an opportunity to tell their truth, but the perpetrators were also given a chance to tell their truth of being a part of the Ministry of State Security. Through the course of this book, women like Julia, Miriam, and Frau Paul express to the reader how their experiences in the GDR were an open wound that would not heal because of how horrific the circumstances were. The ex-Stasi members had little to no remorse for their actions and it solidified the need for harsher punishment. After World War II, many of the war criminals were not brought to justice because of the way the law was written. If the Stasi members were to be given punishment, the judicial system would have to do something about it, otherwise the opinions of a select few citizens would not make a difference. The root to solving this problem is the government; they are fundamentally the only ones that can bring about
On Hitler’s Mountain is a memoir of a child named Irmgard Hunt and her experiences growing up in Nazi Germany. She herself has had many experiences of living during that dark time, she actually met Hitler, had a grandfather who hated Hitler's rule, and had no thoughts or feelings about the Nazi rule until the end of WWII. Her memoir is a reminder of what can happen when an ordinary society chooses a cult of personality over rational thought. What has happened to the German people since then, what are they doing about it today and how do they feel about their past? Several decades later, with most Nazis now dead or in hiding, and despite how much Germany has done to prevent another Nazi rule, everyone is still ashamed of their ancestors’ pasts.
The account of Jedwabne is unique in the fact that it focuses on one mass murder of roughly 1,600 Jewish residents, which occurred in July 1941. The murder occurs during the violent German campaign of anti-Semitism in Poland. The main occurrence seen across Germany and Poland of the anti-Semitism campaign was the killing and justified harassment of Jewish residents. Without a doubt the event in Jedwabne was triggered by Nazi influence. What is interesting is how Gross represents these influences. He shows that the killings of Jedwabne were planned, organized, and enthusiastically conducted by local authorities and citizens of the non-Jewish community. Gross also points out that it is possible that Germans did not participate in this killing and that it is even possib...
World War II was a grave event in the twentieth century that affected millions. Two main concepts World War II is remembered for are the concentration camps and the marches. These marches and camps were deadly to many yet powerful to others. However, to most citizens near camps or marches, they were insignificant and often ignored. In The Book Thief, author Markus Zusak introduces marches and camps similar to Dachau to demonstrate how citizens of nearby communities were oblivious to the suffering in those camps during the Holocaust.
The arguments of Christopher Browning and Daniel John Goldhagen contrast greatly based on the underlining meaning of the Holocaust to ordinary Germans. Why did ordinary citizens participate in the process of mass murder? Christopher Browning examines the history of a battalion of the Order Police who participated in mass shootings and deportations. He debunks the idea that these ordinary men were simply coerced to kill but stops short of Goldhagen's simplistic thesis. Browning uncovers the fact that Major Trapp offered at one time to excuse anyone from the task of killing who was "not up to it." Despite this offer, most of the men chose to kill anyway. Browning's traces how these murderers gradually became less "squeamish" about the killing process and delves into explanations of how and why people could behave in such a manner.
The chaos and destruction that the Nazi’s are causing are not changing the lives of only Jews, but also the lives of citizens in other countries. Between Night by Elie Wiesel and The Hiding Place by Corrie ten Boom, comradeship, faith, strength, and people of visions are crucial to the survival of principle characters. Ironically, in both stories there is a foreseen future, that both seemed to be ignored.
instant postwar penal code of German, which remained first-degree murder could merely be 'for stand intentions' that did not incorporate 'unflustered' contribution in mass killing note. However, executor evidence as well as the Milgram note points that even at the time the wish to obey the group remains a most important ground for somebody performing a dissipated group act. They more or less constantly structure their conformity on “Just Following Orders,” (Estlund 221).
To illustrate the ideas this essay proposes, it will first give a clear and factual overview of the Rosenberg Case. It all began even before the Rosenbergs came into the picture, namely with the arrest and confession of soviet spy Klaus Fuchs in 1950. This namely led to the investigation of his courier, Harry Gold, and then David Greenglass, Ethel Rosenberg's brother. Greenglass cooperated and named Julius Rosenberg as a fellow spy, claiming that he provided Julius with documents from the Los Alamos lab where atomic bombs were fab...
In the novel 1984 and the film “V for Vendetta”, the protagonist for both stories are captured while performing various acts of rebellion against the totalitarian government, of which is controlling their city. In punishment, the government tortures them with harsh, inhumane methods that are similar to those used in dictatorships during the 1900s like the USSR under Stalin’s rule. However, both protagonists are tortured by different sides, and by people from completely opposite ends of the political ladder: one a government agent, the other a rebel. Although the themes disclosed in relation to the purpose and meanings of torture are similar, the overall message and final opinion that is expressed and conveyed to the recipients are complete opposites.
The events which have become to be known as The Holocaust have caused much debate and dispute among historians. Central to this varied dispute is the intentions and motives of the perpetrators, with a wide range of theories as to why such horrific events took place. The publication of Jonah Goldhagen’s controversial but bestselling book “Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust” in many ways saw the reigniting of the debate and a flurry of scholarly and public interest. Central to Goldhagen’s disputed argument is the presentation of the perpetrators of the Holocaust as ordinary Germans who largely, willingly took part in the atrocities because of deeply held and violently strong anti-Semitic beliefs. This in many ways challenged earlier works like Christopher Browning’s “Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland” which arguably gives a more complex explanation for the motives of the perpetrators placing the emphasis on circumstance and pressure to conform. These differing opinions on why the perpetrators did what they did during the Holocaust have led to them being presented in very different ways by each historian. To contrast this I have chosen to focus on the portrayal of one event both books focus on in detail; the mass shooting of around 1,500 Jews that took place in Jozefow, Poland on July 13th 1942 (Browning:2001:225). This example clearly highlights the way each historian presents the perpetrators in different ways through; the use of language, imagery, stylistic devices and quotations, as a way of backing up their own argument. To do this I will focus on how various aspects of the massacre are portrayed and the way in which this affects the presentation of the per...
“’Is my mother a communist?’ Staring. Straight ahead. ‘They were always asking her things, before I came here.’ … ‘Did the Fuhrer take her away?’ … ‘I knew it.’ The words were thrown at the steps and Liesel could feel the slush of anger stirring hotly in her stomach. ‘I hate the Fuhrer’ she said. ‘I hate him.’” (115)
At the end of the war, while the “Red Army” stormed across the Eastern front racing to Berlin, the officers at Treblinka begun to make daring steps to “cover their tracks”. By destroying buildings, killing the remaining Jews, and burning all records, Nazi soldiers hoped to hide all evidence of the atrocities being committed within the camp.
Eva Hoffman’s memoir, Lost in Translation, is a timeline of events from her life in Cracow, Poland – Paradise – to her immigration to Vancouver, Canada – Exile – and into her college and literary life – The New World. Eva breaks up her journey into these three sections and gives her personal observations of her assimilation into a new world. The story is based on memory – Eva Hoffman gives us her first-hand perspective through flashbacks with introspective analysis of her life “lost in translation”. It is her memory that permeates through her writing and furthermore through her experiences. As the reader we are presented many examples of Eva’s memory as they appear through her interactions. All of these interactions evoke memory, ultimately through the quest of finding reality equal to that of her life in Poland. The comparison of Eva’s exile can never live up to her Paradise and therefore her memories of her past can never be replaced but instead only can be supplemented.
Prosecutors have been slacking on the prosecution of Nazi affiliates for long enough, and it’s time for justice to be served. German laws concerning war crimes have recently taken a change for the better. According to Spiegel, a well respected international source for news world wide, stated that a prior conviction of a Nazi concentration camp guard for the murders of thousands of Jews sparked hope in the search for justice. “Demjanjuk was found guilty by a Munich court and sentenced to five years in jail for being an accessory to the murder of 28,060 Jews while he was a guard at Sobibor in occupied Poland.” According to Kurt Schrimm, a German prosecutor, “the Demjanjuk conviction represented a new interpretation of the law.” Because of Demjanjuk’s conviction, prosecutors no longer need to establish culpability in specific murders to secure a conviction. Being an accomplice to the murders that took place in the Holocaust is now enough to find Oskar Gröning guilty for the countless charges he is being charged with. Therefore, under the German legal system, Gröning is guilty for the act of supporting the Nazi regime’s efforts to extinct the Jews and conquer the European
One of the major Nazi criminals from the Holocaust was Franz Strangl, a commander of the Sobibor and Treblinka extermination camps during the Holocaust. In 1961 his name appeared on an official list of “Wanted Criminals.” He was tracked down by Nazi-hunter Simon Wiesenthal, and Strangl was arrested in Brazil on February 28th, 1967. He was tried for co-responsibility in the mass murder of 900,000 Jews at the Treblinka extermination camp and sentenced to life in prison in 1970. Franz Stangl should be held responsible for his actions during the Holocaust.
In order for the German Stasi police to fully profile their target, it required them to issue a three man team consisting of, two alternating onsite Stasi agents and a Stasi general along with a partial informant as well as the support of the government in-order to keep tabs on one man. Despite the Stasi’s efforts they still had other variables preventing them from successfully spying on people, such as empathy. Simply empathy in the case of “The Lives of Others” resulted in the derailing of this case along with some unfortunate events. Because of a Stasi agent developing feelings for his subjects he then acted against his authorities, by obscuring and omitting information. Actions such as these are the precise reasons why this case failed, the technological devices used to keep tabs on Georg Dreyman the subject being spied on in the film functioned perfectly well and went undetected during the duration of the investigation and even years