Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Views on animal captivity
Why shouldn't animals be in captivity
Views on animal captivity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Views on animal captivity
How many of you have ever visited a zoo? I am almost positive everyone has been to the zoo at least once. It is a convenient and easy way to have fun with your family. The real question is it ethical to keep these animals locked in cages for most of their lives? Some would say it is okay, but others would have to disagree. I am guilty of not thinking about how the animals feel, because I am too busy enjoying walking around looking at them all. Most would say that because they are animals that they do not have feelings like humans do, so there is no reason to worry about then. Some would say that they are safer and will live longer if they are kept in captivity. Many people would agree that keeping animals locked up in cages is unethical …show more content…
One of the article states that “The more scientists learn about animal behavior, the more zoos seem in conflict with zoology.” This means that keeping animals in captivity could be affecting their behavior. Most people think that because they are animals that they do not have feelings, but this is not the case. Studies show that some animals care more about things than humans. Keeping animals in captivity not only changes their behavior, but it can also change their moods and even cause them to become distressed. Most zoos that I have been to usually only have one animal per exhibit; this can cause the animals to become lonely and depressed. Most animals that are in the wild are usually found in …show more content…
Not all zoos have the bad reputation just because it is a zoo. Not all animals are kept like they should be although I wish they were. One article states that “It merely means we need to pay more attention to the bad and improve them or close them.” I agree with this stamen, because one bad zoo should not change how you feel about all zoos. Zoos are a very poor target for tough criticism because one person most likely ended up at the wrong zoo. Zoos are good, because they allow people to get a closer look at wildlife. They also allow people to educate themselves about animals the normally would know nothing
The truth can be a bit overwhelming, it is clear and simple, wild animals should not be held in captivity. With all this researching and finding the dirt on what really happens behind closed doors, it is hard to believe some people, who are aware of what really goes on, continue to support these programs. It is not morally correct to take advantage of a being, who is incapable of standing up for itself, for the pleasure of mankind. We have no right to do such a thing because we are all the same, under it all we are just another set of bones to lay to rest. If we would not hold our fellow humans captives and force them to entertain then why do we do it to animals? What if the roles were reversed and we were the defenseless ones? Say what you want, in the end keeping wild animals captive is wrong and needs to be stopped.
Keeping animals locked in cages, bored and cramped up in such a small space is an awful sight to show the children. It creates an image in the little minds of children that animals are to be treated like they don’t matter. They say Zoos are a place where children can learn about the wild, exotic animals, but in reality it doesn't teach them anything only that they are meant to be caged up, which is wrong. Also, it is really painful to see the animals bored and lonely, so why should people keep letting them do this to these beautiful creatures. Animal captivity for entertainment should end to let them go to their rightful home.
Zoo captivity is substandard and inadequate for animals. Zoo animals are deprived of their right as animals they are treated unjustly and unfairly. Animals should not be forced to kept in a cage away from their natural environment and be used as a form of entertainment to humans. The animals also suffer from stress and are driven insane by being trapped behind bars. The zoo is supposed to provide safety to these endangered animals but instead, these zoo animals are put at risk towards a variety of dangers such as vulnerability to diseases and starvation.
“Another memorable encounter took place in San Antonio, when I pulled into a transmission repair shop. The owner test-drove the Olds with me in the pasenger seat. As we climbed a hill, the car seemed to be straining. I looked down and noted that he had one foot on the gas and the other on the brake. ‘boy, it ain't got no power at all in second gear,’ he said. ‘It's real obvious the clutches are burnt.’ His solution: rebuild the transmission for $395 to $495, ‘depending on if I can save the torque converter.’ ” –totse.com
The article, “Are Zoos Cruel? The Pros and Cons of Zoos and Wildlife parks”, discusses the advantages and disadvantages animals have being in zoos and wildlife parks. It states, “The physical and mental frustrations of captivity often lead to abnormal, neurotic, and even self destructive behavior, such as incessant pacing, swaying, head-bobbing, bar-biting, and self-mutilation. In other words, animals tend to become psychotic when held in captivity. Their psychotic behavior comes from the restriction of freedom they have. This is significant because it validates my argument that dysfunctions.
Do you think animals should be put into zoos? Well they shouldn't, because they are put into misery and they also suffer in their cages.
One of the many disadvantages animals have is being locked in cages of zoos, is to enjoy the quality of freedom and independence. The animals can’t enjoy the satisfaction of catching their own prey, or the relief of living in their own natural habitat. Plus, the size of the zoo provides for the animals is too small, so the animals don’t get the proper exercise like they would in the wild. Studies have shown tigers and lions have around 18,000 times less space in zoos then they would in their natural habitat. In fact , Woburn Safari Parks was keeping its lion...
Many animals live in enclosures as similar to their natural habitat as possible. An article from ‘NYLN’ on the pros and cons of captivity explained ‘animals are housed in mini-habitats, which means they are living in enclosures as close as possible to their natural habitats as possible.’ This is meant to make the animals feel relaxed and like they are in the wild while still providing them with food and medication as well as letting people look at them. Therefore this is a positive use of captivity as it provides humans with entertainment and animals with what they
middle of paper ... ... Freedom is precious and animals are constantly suffering mentally and physically from the lack of freedom that captivity brings to them. Although many zoos are visited by millions of people annually, they still operate at a loss and have to make budget cuts. Funds that should be used to provide humane conditions for animals are often wasted on cosmetic improvements such as landscaping, refreshment stands, and gift shops in order to draw visitors, leaving the animals behind steel bars and glass trapped in a concrete jungle for no reason without hope of ever being free.
There are billions of animals in captivity around the world. These animals are in zoos, breeding centers, and research laboratories. All those animals lead to out lash because of the stress of being in a small confinement habitat. Is it ethical to keep animals in captivity for research, breeding, or for our enjoyment? Over the years keeping animals in captive has not changed in safety and the well-being of the animal.
Even though some zoos have an endangered species exhibit with the intention of protecting and rehabilitating animals, many do not do an adequate job of protecting the animals. Zoos have been harmful to the very animals they have sworn to protect. Animals in captivity often suffer from anxiety, boredom and other severe issue related to prolonged confinement. Most animals are unable to thrive in small enclosure with unnatural weather and climates. For example elephants are known to walk as far as 30 miles per day, but the association of Zoos and aquariums only require a space the measures $0 feet by 45 feet, which is about the size of a three car garage, to house these large animals. (peta.org) the drastic difference in the amount of space their allowed ...
“It is estimated to be 50 times more expensive to keep an elephant in a zoo than to protect sufficient natural habitat to sustain that elephant and many other animals.” (CAPS, Sad Eyes & Empty Lives- The reality of zoos) Indeed, only if the billions of dollars that spent on building a zoo are optimized to preserve habitats and animal welfare, can our grandchildren still have a chance to see more rare animals by their own eyes.
Second of all, animals in captivity show stereotypical behavior and how this shows that animals are bored in zoos. Animal Welfare Institute says “Stereotypic behavior is an abnormal behavior frequently seen in laboratory primates. It is considered an indication of poor psychological well-being in these animals. As it is seen in captive animals but not in wild animals, attention has been focused on the situations in which this behavior develops,” (Animal Welfare Institute). You don’t see animals doing stereotypical behaviors in the wild. This is not good for them, they're just doing the same things over and over again. This can also lead to self-mutilation,(A.K.A) them harming themselves in some way over and over again, like hitting their head
The first reason why animals should not be kept in captivity is animals need room to roam. In zoos they don’t have a big enough area for the animals to roam in their enclosed habitats. Animals need room to climb, fly, swim, roam or run in zoos. If animals are out of captivity they have room to do all of these things unlike in zoos they don’t. According to the article Do Animals Lose in Zoos even with man made-made areas to fly, swim, climb, and explore, animals are still restricted to their behavior.
Zoos are an unsuitable environment for wild animals and should, therefore, be abolished. Firstly, zoo animals are kept in a very confined area compared with their vast natural habitat. Secondly, breeding programmes are far less successful than zoos claim. Thirdly, zoo animals are exposed to many diseases and other dangers.