Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of testing on animals
Effects of testing on animals
Negative effects of animal testing on animals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of testing on animals
A Veterinarian Researcher does many tests, and supervises the production of drugs, chemicals, and biological products to better the lives of animals. Some people may think that testing on animals is inhumane, however if we didn 't test on animals the only other option would be on humans. Although testing on animals may have limitations, they are also the closest living thing to humans. Animal testing is a much safer alternative to human testing. Humans have a higher moral status and animals lack human rights. Could you imagine humans being science experiments and not knowing what the outcome might be? Characteristics such as maximum dose tolerance, safety, and time span of effect all play a role, if this is done tested on humans directly many …show more content…
American woman on average use 12 personal care products a day, so product safety is of great importance. The U.S. Food Administration endorses the use of animal tests on cosmetics to make sure the product and the ingredients are safe. Cosmetic test on animals main goal is to determine that potential harm a substance can do to a living species if it is ingested, inhaled or comes into contact with the body. Cosmetic testing is mainly focused on making sure that a product does not harm a person 's eye or skin. It is also tested for overall toxicity and any other toxicity related to ultraviolet light (Connect Us 5). Governments today still require cosmetic companies to test on animals to ensure the safety of the products. Testing on the animals first will determine the dose that will be given to the volunteers and patients during the first human trials. …show more content…
The laboratory care takers are required to clean and maintain the kennels the test animals stay in so their living conditions are more pleasant. They must dust, spray and bathe the animals to control insects. If that is not done so then the animals my start to feel discomfort and could also end up with rashes or bug bites. The animals must also receive proper nutrition. The animal need the proper food to keep them healthy and they also need to make sure they are receiving the correct amount of food, so they are not over or under fed. The caretaker 's job is to also make sure the animals feel as if they are in a safe and loving environment or the test may not come out correct. To ensure this happens the caretakers need to play with them,exercise the animals, take them on a walk, provide them with companionship, groom, trim or clip animals coats just as they would be taken care of in housing
The use of animals to test cosmetics is introduced in their article as well. The authors quote a vast amount of credible sources from prestigious universities such as Princeton and from well known animal rights group such as PETA. I will use this as my main source of information.
In the twenty first century, we have so many other alternatives besides continuing to burn, shock, poison, starve, and kill over 100 million animals to test new household products and medicines when it has been proved that animal testing is an ineffective way to cure illnesses and improve human life. Animals do not suffer the same illnesses as humans do and injecting them into animals and studying the effects delays our time to further understand the sickness on an actual human. Seeing that an animals’ genetic makeup is much different from a humans then certain medicines that work on animals more often than not are not effective on humans. Therefore, results are often very misleading. “Animals are fed harmful substances, infected with lethal viruses, subjected to brain damage, heart attacks, strokes, and cancers”(“What’s Wrong With…”). Through a humane perspective, the murder of millions of animals is a disturbing thought to hold. As a country, we continue to remain oblivious to what continues to go on behind laboratory doors for cosmetic, medical, and industrial purposes.
asked the United States Institute of Medicine to conduct a research to assess the possible health
The Cruelty of Cosmetic Testing on Animals Each year, thousands of animals are brutally tortured in laboratories, in the name of cosmetic research. A movement to ban animal testing for cosmetic purposes has been gaining popularity, with many companies hopping on the bandwagon against this research. New alternatives have been developed to eliminate the need to test on animals. This is only a small beginning of what is necessary to end these immoral acts. Animal testing in cosmetics is useless and cruel, and can be accomplished by other methods of research to end the suffering of animals.
Can you imagine your pet, Fluffy being ripped apart on your table for an animal experiment. Well I now I would not like that happening to me so I doubt you would not like that either. So many animals die every year because of animal experiments. Animals should never die because of animals experiments. Some people may think, that scientist are using these animals to test cancer cures or virus cures. You may think that but research proves that most scientist are not really using them for those reasons. Animals should never be used for research because animal organs are different from human organs, animals are being harmed on purposes to see if a cure would work even though they are dieing in the process, and most animal research is used for
Testing cosmetics on animals safety and hypo-allergenic properties of products for use by humans. In March 2013, a new European Union law was achieved, that made it illegal to sell animal-tested cosmetics in Europe, even if the testing was done outside Europe. Approximately 100,000-200,000 animals suffer and die just for cosmetics every year around the world. These are rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, rats, and mice. While dogs and monkeys are never used to test cosmetics anywhere in the world, they are used to test other types of chemicals.
About 800,000 animals are used in the cosmetic industry for testing. So that lotion,foundation, perfume, and everything else in-between was tested on an animal except if it was cruelty free. So what is animal testing you may ask. Animal testing is when products are being tested on living creatures such as rats,rabbits,hamsters,etc, to find a reaction. If they find a reaction that means that that product won't work for us. Animals should not be used for cosmetic purposes or procedures because it is unnecessary, wasteful, and its unethical.
Its’ another morning and the room is white. There are bars all around and the smell of cleaner is everywhere. Soon I see a person holding a tube of something. The person is coming towards me. Suddenly I’m out of the bars and sitting on a table. The person held me down and put the tube against me. It burns! I want to run but cant. My heart rate goes up and I start to tremble. This will be done several times a day with several different tubes. Law requires I get pain medication but it is minimal and wears off quickly.
Did you know that mice are 98 percent genetically similar to humans. Animals are great research subjects because they are so similar to humans. According to Frankie L. Trull, the president of the Foundation of Biomedical Research ”During animal testing the animals are treated very well to ensure accurate results.’’This topic is controversial because some animals may experience pain. That pain is usually minimal. I support animal testing because it benefits humans, so we know what drugs/medicines are safe. Also, if you don't support animal testing would you rather have humans be tested on?
First of all, animal testing should be banned in order to protect the rights of animals. In other words, animals’ rights are infringed by experimenting on them. Animals and humans are similar in many ways. To begin with, they have similar levels of biological complexity. They both are aware that they exist and they both make conscious choices. Philosophy professor at North Carolina State University Tom Regan points out "Animals have a basic moral right to respectful treatment. This inherent value is not respected when animals are reduced to being mere tools in a scientific experiment." (F. B. Orlans) Experimentation on an animal ...
Testing on animals is not good for them. It hurts the animals. Animals feel things just like humans. They get hurt because scientists have to put whatever disease they’re trying to cure into the animals. Sometimes even when they do cure it on the animal, it doesn’t even work on humans. We could just test it on humans to make sure that it actually works. Animals don’t have all
Dr. Akhtar, M.D., M.P.H., in neurologist and preventive medicine asserts that stress-related laboratory procedures and environment change can have a significant effect on the test results of any creatures (Akhtar, Aysha). Therefore, experiments can be completely off because of the change in factor in the animals resulting bad test results. In an article by the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine they affirm that, “Most experiments on animals are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances, and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses.” In other words, animals testing isn’t necessary because it doesn’t contribute to medical advancement. Furthermore, Doctor Aysha Akhtar, alleged that 90 percent of clinical trials that are effective on animals are ineffective or unsafe on humans (Alternatives to Animal Use in Research).” According to Todd Preuss, an anthropologist at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center at Emory University, “Rats and humans have been on their own evolutionary paths for tens of millions of years. We've developed our own unique features, and so have the rodents. So it should come as no surprise that a drug that works in a mouse often doesn't work in a person (Harris, Richard).” The continuation of animal testing cloud
Like Lindsey Andrews says in her article “pros and cons about animal testing” Animals are actually treated with care, in order to get the best and accurate results animals have to be very healthy. Animals are taken good care of by specialist and vets. If the animals are stressed or overcrowded the results will be considered inaccurate, So people try and do there best to take care of them. They are also provided a space for themselves along with toys water and healthy food choice. Some people actually say animals are treated better in the lab than in pet stores. They are also cleaned and washed regularly. So if you think about it animals are provided a “home”.
Each year, approximately 100 million animals including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds are experimented on and killed in U.S. laboratories, according to PETA. This is all for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing. Animal testing is when there is a use of non-human animals that act as the controlled variable to show the affect and behavior under a certain chemical. Is the animal experimentation really worth it? Some people have argued that animal experimentation can be justified because they are animals and they are not human but, a closer examination shows that animal cruelty can not be justified because of
Animals might not have the exact same science as humans, however, animal testing is correct enough to check whether or not a substance is safe enough for human trials. Looking up on the fact that animal analysis has developed treatments for bacterial infection that the unit is a significant reason behind death and saved many lives. Therefore, causing animals not be taken lightly for the purpose of science for the sole purpose, sparing human lives, may be viewed as ethical to some degree on the off chance that has helped the advancement of science and when it’s all said and done.