Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of animal testing on animals
Animal rights testing
Animal rights testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effects of animal testing on animals
Seventy million of lives are claimed by animal testing facilities and millions more survive through the horrific tests, suffering the psychological and physical consequences. The use of animals in experiments at labs that are funded by the government has increased 73 percent in the past 15 years, according to a new study conducted by PETA. The study, in the Journal of Medical Ethics, found the number of animals tested increased from 1,566,994 in 1997 to 2,705,772 in 2012 in testing by the top 25 institutional recipients of National Institute of Health grants.” stated CBS News. With each year, the numbers increase these experiments range from experimenting new household items to medical breakthroughs.
From the moment the animal is born
…show more content…
Food and water get taken away for testing purposes. Sometimes the animals are kept restrained for long periods of time without any food or water or breaks to relieve themselves. Things such as social isolation and constant breeding and separation from the mother bring a great deal of stress to this animals. To top it of 95% of the animals that are used in experiments are not protected by Animal Welfare Act such as rats, fish and birds just to name a few. This is a problem because those animals have higher risks or being mistreated and mental and physical abuse. Over 25 million of animals are used for biomedical experimental, products and cosmetic testing which includes animals such as dogs, cats, pigs and sheep just to name a few. Behind the facilities walls there is no telling what can’t be done. Enduring this amount of trauma can lead to the animal to completely shut down and …show more content…
Many have avoided to use and even discuss the alternative options. Many still believe that animal testing is is acceptable because it is for the greater good for humans to have safer products. Others think animal testing is an acceptable thing to do because animals are below the human race therefore, they do don’t have the same rits as us. Studies shown that people have become okay with it because they believe that animal do not suffer and is completely necessary, they simply choose to ignore the reality of it, that animals suffer horrific and traumatic experiences. For example , many cosmetic companies have come up with ways to test their products without the usage of animals.
Majority of the animals that are used, are flawed which means poor results and wasting an animal’s life. Studies have shown that many medical breakthrough could have been done with the usage of animal subjects. If animals aren’t willingly giving their lives or wanting to go through painful and traumatizing procedures animal testing should be illegal. In other words it is unnecessary when there are alternative ways that can produce better
According to ProCon.org, in 2010, there were 1,134,693 reported animal testing subjects. However, this statistic fails to tell the whole story. Reported animal test subjects account for only between five and fifteen percent of the total amount of animals used in test labs (“Animal Testing”). However, according to In Defense of Animals, or IDA, the United States federal laws only mandate the number of “warm-blooded vertebrae animals used in science” to be counted and reported. Based on this federal law it is estimated that twenty-eight million animals are used annually in American test labs alone (“Frequently Asked Questions”). In 2007, slightly less than a half million animals were used by the United States Department of Defense. Even with growing evidence showing the dangers of animal testing, America continues to implement these processes. In May 2013, the United States Coast Guard went as far as to ignore a Congressional order to begin to scale back the amount of animal t...
Over 100 Million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in testing Labs every year. Animals are used to test the safety of products, advance scientific research, and develop models to study disease and to develop new medical treatments all for the sake of mankind. Animals should not be used for scientific research because animal testing is inhumane, other testing methods now exist, and animals are very different from human beings.
...Because people see animal testing procedures as unethical and immoral, it’s important for them to consider what their health would be like without the process—potentially afflicted with incurable illnesses. Continuing the animal experimenting process can only prove beneficial in promoting fewer ailments and cures to existing and future diseases.
Not only do we have other options for these tests, but animals testing has actually been proven to be ineffective. Companies claim that this sort of cruelty will benefit the human population by testing the “safety” of the products, as they have been for hundreds of years and although this may have been helpful in the past, scientists have discovered otherwise. “While funding for animal experimentation and the number of animals tested on continues to increase, the United States still ranks 49th in the world in life expectancy and second worst in infant mortality in the developed world” (“Animal Testing Is”). This evidence shows that while we still continue to support and spend money on animal testing, it is not working as well as we thought.Essentially we are torturing the animals for a negative outcome, both for the human and the animal. The Food and Drug Administration reports that “92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans” (“Top Five Reasons”). If the products and drugs that we are testing on the animals are not working then there is no use in harming a harmless animal for them. Some may disagree and say that animal testing has enabled us to develop many life saving treatments for both humans and animals. But in reality there has been more cons then pros in animal testing. For example, “Animal tests on the arthritis drug Vioxx showed that it had a protective effect on the hearts of mice, yet the drug went on to cause more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being pulled from the market” (Should Animals Be). While animal testing has enabled us to create great products it is usually ineffective on humans and leads to animals being harmed for no
Hundreds and millions of animals are killed everyday due to animal testing. The number of animal deaths in labs have halved since the 1970’s. An animal dies in a Canadian lab every 16 seconds! The contemporary scale of animal deaths due to animal testing is unacceptable! 17-22 million animals are tested on each year and at least half are put to death. 2.5 million animals are killed due to animal testing at the Great Britain Zoo every year. Animal testing essentially involves harming or killing the animals, every year so many innocent animals are put to death on behalf of our a...
Hundreds of millions of animals die every year from animal testing in the United States. Innocent animals are used everyday in laboratories for biology advancements, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetic testing. They are used to provide information to make better products that are safe for human use. Although animal experimentation has some benefits, the negatives outweigh the positives. Animal testing is killing off innocent beings for the possible human benefit, and with modern technology, there are alternative ways to test products that leave animals unharmed.
One drug, used to cure symptoms of arthritis, caused the death of more than sixty thousand people in the United States. This drug was pulled off the market in 2004 because animal testing led researchers to believe that that drug, Vioxx, was safe (New England Anti-Vivisection...). A simple arthritis drug killed thousands of people, but the blame does not fall to the animals; therefore, the blame is on the researchers and scientists who trusted the animals test results to predict beneficial outcomes for humans. This drug is only one of numerous cases where a drug has been recalled due to the fact that it causes harmful results that were not seen in animal experiments. An animal’s make-up is similar to that of humans, but nonetheless there are
Animal Testing should be banned because it’s cruel, it's archaic and unreliable. Animal testing goes back to 322 B.C times and used by Greek Physicians (Hajar M.D) . In more recent times it' has been a controversial topic because it is considered to be inhumane. Doctors would use this practice, just for their own curiosity. There have been laws passed in several different countries to make the testing more humane.
The Papal Encyclical Evangelium Vitae recognises that animals have both an intrinsic value and a place in God's kingdom. ( BBC, 2009) An animal test is any logical test or test in which a live animal is forced to experience something that is probably going to cause them torment, distress, trouble or lasting harm. Animals used as a part of research centers are purposely hurt, not for their own good, and are generally killed toward the end of the experiment. In God's arrangement man and woman have the vocation of "subduing" the earth as stewards of God. This power isn't to be a subjective and dangerous leader. God calls man and woman, made in the picture of the Creator "who loves everything that exists", to partake in his provision toward different animals; henceforth their duty regarding the world God has endowed to them. (BBC,2009)
One reason why many people support animal testing is that humans and animals are very similar genetically. According to the California Biomedical Research Association “All animals have similar organs, such as the heart,lungs and liver.”They all function the same way as our organs do. If you didn't know, most animals that are tested are mice and rats. Mice and rats are genetically 98 percent similar to humans. Also humans and animals can carry the same diseases (Why we Should accept animal testing). H.I.V, A.I.D.S, arthritis ,diabetes and cancer are just a few of the diseases that humans and animals both acquire. If you say that animal testing is unnecessary; that is not a factual statement. There is a multitude of evidence to contradict that statement.
Diana: Good afternoon Melanie. Thank you for coming to my house. I wanted to meet with you because I know you are a very well-known scientist and you work on animal testing. I am not very sure this is something moral to work on and I have always wanted to listen the point of view of a specialized scientist. I personally believe animal testing should not be allowed.
Should animal testing should be banned? Well, in these next paragraphs they're going to be explaining about how animal testing should be banned. Most of these paragraphs are going to be talking about animal cruelty, wasteful animal testing, and how animal testing is dangerous to humans and animals. In this essay, it will prove that animal testing should be banned for many reasons. Also it will tell, why should animal testing should be banned.
Many animal lovers keep pushing to ban animal testing around the world. But, most people do not really know the science behind animal testing, or how it works. Animal testing is a commonly known, controversial issue. People usually have a strong opinion on animal testing, either that it should be outlawed or that it scientifically makes sense to do. Testing on animals should not be banned because it is an efficient, effective, helps not only humans. First of all, animal testing is very efficient and effective. Without animal testing, diseases like polio, mumps, diphtheria, rubella, and hepatitis would not be curable (Trull). Second, many people think testing on animals is only beneficial for humans. But, lots of treatments for other animals
Animal testing makes it possible for certain medical procedures to be performed without endangering human life. Animals are important for medical research
When you are starting to conduct a research experiment, there are many things done previously to ensure quality and accurate results. Without all the regulations and checks it would be very easy for someone to just come up with an idea and create an experiment and publish their findings. But thankfully, there are procedures set in place so that you must have many different groups and different variables to ensure the validity of the experiment. In research, sampling is best described as a particular “groups” that are involved with the experiments. There is a rule that there must be a control group in order for the experiment to have validity.