Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion for animal testing for cosmetics
Essays on banning animal testing
Conclusion for animal testing for cosmetics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion for animal testing for cosmetics
Why you should reduce the amount of animal products you buy
Good morning/ afternoon 8.2 and Mr. McNamara, today I will be discussing why you should drastically reduce the amount the animal products you buy.
Animal testing is one of the most major animal abuse problems throughout the whole entire world. Many big name brands (such as L’Oreal, Pantene, and even MAC) still use animals to test their products. Over 115 million dogs, cats, and other animals are burned, poisoned and even killed in these tests each year. Can you imagine if you were doomed to live your entire life in a cage and constantly have aggravatingly painful experiments performed on you daily? But even worse, knowing these experiments would leave you with life-long injuries or even your death? This speech will include, firstly, what happens to animals in these tests, secondly, why animal testing should end and finally, what you can do to help stop these tests. By the end of this speech, you will agree with me that you should drastically reduce the amount of animal tested
…show more content…
Not only are most killed in these tests, before their deaths, some are forced to inhale toxic fumes, some have holes drilled into their skulls, and others have their spinal cords crushed. In addition to the torment of the actual experiments, animals in laboratories are deprived of everything that is natural and important to them. ("Experiments on Animals: Overview", 2012). Also, if we keep on killing a large amount of animals, we will soon not have the diversity of animals that we have today. Would you like it if your life as you know it was completely changed, you were separated from your family and hurt over and over again? You wouldn’t be able to live your life like that so why should innocent animals? But as hard as the experiments are to believe, there is technology that could be used instead of the animals, completely making all this hurt and loneliness
"Animal Testing Is Cruel and Does Not Benefit Medical Research." You Can Save the Animals: 251 Ways to Stop Thoughtless Cruelty. Rocklin, CA: Prima Publishing, 1999. Rpt. in Animal Experimentation. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. At Issue. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 7 July
Hundreds of millions of animals lives are taken each year because of the “necessity” of testing products that don’t apply to animals whatsoever. Therefor, I hold my stance as an advocate, or being against animal testing in general. There are many advocates for this topic which is a positive aspect, but it is still happening out there. Once again I believe animals should not be tested on for products because all living things should be treated humanely, there are other ways to test products, and millions of animals are put to their death because of the
Right now, millions or animals including mice, rabbits, primates, cats, dogs and others are locked inside cold cages in laboratories across the country. More than 100 million animals each year suffer and die from chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics tests as well as biology lessons, medical training exercises, and curiosity-driven medical experiments at universities. Throughout history, animal testing has played an important role in harming animals for human advantages, making many animals suffer. Animal testing should be excluded because its inhumane, violates the rights of animals, and there are safer alternatives.
Specific Purpose – To persuade my audience that animal testing is wrong and how other safer alternatives should be taken.
the fda reports that 92 our of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans
According to the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (2013) over one hundred million animals suffer and sometimes die from experiments to test chemicals, drugs, foods, and cosmetics (para 3). Although it is good that the companies are concerned that their products do not harm consumers, the law does not require most of these tests animals endure. Furthermore, these tests do not have accurate results, so the animals may suffer but the product is still sold to the people. While products that burnt bunnies’ eyes away are being marketed to consumers, government agencies are using taxpayers’ hard earned money to fund these horrible, pointless experiments.
Since experiments are cruel and expensive, “the world’s most forward-thinking scientists have moved on to develop and use methods for studying diseases and testing products that replace animals and are actually relevant to human health” (“Alternatives to Animals”). Companies claim that this sort of cruelty will benefit the human population by testing the “safety” of the products, as they have been for hundreds of years, and although this may have been helpful in the past, scientists have discovered otherwise. “While funding for animal experimentation and the number of animals tested on continues to increase, the United States still ranks 49th in the world in life expectancy and second worst in infant mortality in the developed world” (“Animal Testing Is”). This evidence shows that while we still continue to support and spend money on animal testing, it is not working as well as we thought.
(Preview Main Points) I will first talk about how animals are tested on to give us the products that we use everyday. Second, I will speak about why animals are chosen to be test subjects, then lastly about how we can help end animal testing.
Simple household items such as lotions, shampoos and cosmetics aren’t very expensive and are within reach for the public, yet the public is not knowledgeable of the fact that the products that they use everyday are put through a series of tests which involve the use of harmless animals. Several large commercial companies do not make products for animals; they decide that using these harmless creatures for the testing of their products, could be cause to be harmful to animals still go forward with these types of procedures on an everyday basis. Although these animals are unable to defend themselves or signs of any form of consent for the near death procedures, these companies find this as a cheap solution for testing their products before placing them on the market. There are many other alternatives to testing animals such as embryonic stem cell research. Animal experimentation is wrong and it can be avoided but companies which are greedy for money chose not to.
Hundreds of millions of animals die every year from animal testing in the United States. Innocent animals are used everyday in laboratories for biology advancements, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetic testing. They are used to provide information to make better products that are safe for human use. Although animal experimentation has some benefits, the negatives outweigh the positives. Animal testing is killing off innocent beings for the possible human benefit, and with modern technology, there are alternative ways to test products that leave animals unharmed.
It still comes as a surprise to me that with all the technology in today’s society, we are still relying on animals for cosmetic research. Some people think that it is acceptable and even justified to test on mere animals rather than risk hurting people. So, for these kinds of people, animal testing makes perfect sense. However, in my opinion, animals are living creatures and have the right to live out their lives as nature intended rather than simply surviving in cages while being poked and prodded with whatever scientists fancy. I think it is depressing and sort of grotesque that I am using products that have been tested on animals that are even commonly bred as our pets. So, I began my research to find out what companies still test on animals, why they do so, and what other alternatives they could use in place of animal testing.
Every year, thousands of animals are tormented, and then die during the animal experiments. Another fact is from Vivisection Information Network, there is a rough estimate from the European Union that 10.5 million vertebrate animals were used in animal experiments, which is 28,800 per day or one every three seconds. Around 18.5 million animals were used in the USA per year (Updated). Also, there are still a large amount of animals that have not been registered. Even though there are disadvantages and disagreement in using of animal experiment, there is also some evidences show that animal experiment is inevitable for the future progress, and the human beings would not have greater life quality without animal testing.
Our case is that if we don’t test on animals then progress in scientific fields would be halted. As first speaker for the negative I will speak about the benefits of animal testing in general and then I’ll talk in detail about animal testing in medicine. My second speaker will talk about the opinions on testing and the food chain and my third speaker will summarise our points and rebut.
It is said that the lion is the king of the jungle, as the shark supposedly rules the sea. Should we, as humans, dominate animals for the supposed fact that we have a larger right over them? Animal experiments are conducted at every corner of planet. Whether it’s testing out new makeup products or a possible cure for a lethal disease, they exist all around. In class, I came across a picture of mouse.
Over 100 million animals are used in experiments; 95% of these animals end up dying. Animals are killed and mutilated for the sake of science. Some experiments can involve “blinding, severing of limbs, damaging brain, and ingesting various drugs.” (Coster,