Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Easy rights of animals 150 words
Advantage Of Animal Testing
Advantage Of Animal Testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Easy rights of animals 150 words
“In 2004 (U.S) 1,101,958 animals were tested on. That is just including dogs, cats, primates, guinea pigs, hamsters, rabbits and farm animals. This does not include the millions or mice and rats tested on each year, because the government does not consider mice and rats "real" animals; therefore experimenters do not keep track of how many they test.” (Pruce). Millions of innocent animals are tortured each year through cruel processes in order to improve human’s appearances and health. With the amount of time, resources and money used in this industry, one would think that advancements would seem abundant, but in reality animal testing has not led to major outbreaks and is further a waste of taxpayer’s money. Upon the millions of animals losing lives, taxpayers losing money and science not advancing further, animal testing is avoidable, immoral and futile to society. Despite the millions of dollars spent on …show more content…
Stated in our ‘Declaration of Independence,’ humans possess their “unalienable rights” because we are of the genus and species Homo sapiens. This unsigned contract is the origin of most laws protecting humans from violence and self-harm. However, animals are not provided with this privilege. The only rights acquired by animals are those granted by humans. According to Justin Goodman, “animal rights activists perceive that simply by virtue of birth, every organism, everywhere, is endowed with the same rights as citizens of the most progressive democracy.” Zoo occupants, domesticated pets, and service animals are administered securities by the human race from the troubles of the state of nature such as the starvation and natural disasters in exchange for their ability and willingness to be trained to serve the human race’s needs. Domesticated animals are produced, bolstered, and anesthetized until the human race decides when this unspoken contract has expired and therefore terminate the animal’s
Without animal research, cures for such diseases as typhoid, diphtheria, and polio might never have existed. Without animal research, the development of antibiotics and insulin would have been delayed. Without animal research, many human beings would now be dead. However, because of animal testing, 200,000 dogs, 50,000 cats, 60,000 primates, 1.5 million hamsters, and uncounted millions of rats and mice are experimented upon and die each year, as living fodder for the great human scientific machine. Some would say that animal research is an integral part of progress; unfortunately, this is often true. On the whole, animal testing is a necessary evil that should be reduced and eliminated whenever possible.
Animals are used as a part of experimentations in order to accomplish new openings. A few individuals think that it is satisfactory, while others contend that it is not moral to sacrifice animals for science. Estimated, that fifty to one hundred million of animals are used for tests in the world. Despite the significance of experiments, the quantity of animals and purpose of research are not under any control. Animals testing should be banned under a few circumstances; we can enhance the situation by using alternative ways such as replacement, reduction, and refinement according to International Society for Applied Ethology.
Since experiments are cruel and expensive, “the world’s most forward-thinking scientists have moved on to develop and use methods for studying diseases and testing products that replace animals and are actually relevant to human health” (“Alternatives to Animals”). Companies claim that this sort of cruelty will benefit the human population by testing the “safety” of the products, as they have been for hundreds of years, and although this may have been helpful in the past, scientists have discovered otherwise. “While funding for animal experimentation and the number of animals tested on continues to increase, the United States still ranks 49th in the world in life expectancy and second worst in infant mortality in the developed world” (“Animal Testing Is”). This evidence shows that while we still continue to support and spend money on animal testing, it is not working as well as we thought.
Hundreds and millions of animals are killed everyday due to animal testing. The number of animal deaths in labs have halved since the 1970’s. An animal dies in a Canadian lab every 16 seconds! The contemporary scale of animal deaths due to animal testing is unacceptable! 17-22 million animals are tested on each year and at least half are put to death. 2.5 million animals are killed due to animal testing at the Great Britain Zoo every year. Animal testing essentially involves harming or killing the animals, every year so many innocent animals are put to death on behalf of our a...
“Over 1 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in U.S. labs” according to DoSomething.org. And although these animals may be considered protected under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) they are still able to be tortured and mistreated in labs. On top of all this, there is absolutely no guarantee that results and data collected from these procedures are accurate. Our anatomic builds are similar in ways but not at all interchangeable. Even though it has saved lives, animal experimentation should be banned because it is not a guarantee that these procedures are done pain free and humans and animals react differently to the medicines and chemicals used.
Animals have held an important spot in many of our lives. Some people look at animals as companions and others see them as a means of experimental research and medical advancement. With the interest to gain knowledge, physicians have dissected animals. The ethics of animal testing have always been questioned because humans do not want to think of animals on the same level as humans. Incapable of our thinking and unable to speak, animals do not deserve to be tested on by products and be conducted in experiments for our scientific improvement. Experimentation on animals is cruel, unfair, and does not have enough beneficial results to consider it essential.
Hundreds of millions of animals die every year from animal testing in the United States. Innocent animals are used everyday in laboratories for biology advancements, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetic testing. They are used to provide information to make better products that are safe for human use. Although animal experimentation has some benefits, the negatives outweigh the positives. Animal testing is killing off innocent beings for the possible human benefit, and with modern technology, there are alternative ways to test products that leave animals unharmed.
With the products that improve the quality of life popping up every day, it leaves you wondering how these products have become so perfected. A big part of that is in prior animal testing. While animal testing is sometimes highlighted from time to time, it is not commonly thought of when using a product. Highly rated shampoo? It was most likely tested on an animal beforehand. Animal testing in many cases can leave a physical and psychological impact on animals that are irreversible. Animal testing in an experiment is cruelty. Experiments can go wrong if something unexpected happens or there is an error in judgment. After these experiments, the animals may never be the same and that is if they’re not killed after the experiment
animal welfare controversy is the question of whether humans have the right over animals or if the animals themselves have rights.This questions fuels countless other debates regarding animals. This would mean that humans would not have ownership over animals in any way. No use of them for food, clothing, experimentation, companionship, or any interference what-so-ever. To claim that man 's use of animals is immoral… “ is to elevate moral levels of an animal higher than ourselves”, which is a flagrant contradiction (Locke 132). Animals should not be given a higher moral standing than humans. Animal rights are completely based on this one thought. In general animal welfare claims that animals are below humans, giving humans ownership and more rights than animals. Many do not understand the “rights” being discussed. The “rights” that people continue debating about are not the right to vote, freedom of speech, or the right to bear arms. It is the right to not be taken for food against your will, be used for clothing or experimentation without consent. Animals do not have the moral capacity to obtain these rights and freedoms. To elevate animals to equality with humans by applying human interpretations of morality. Author John Katz was sent a letter by an animal rights activist asking him to change his upcoming book to call humans animal “guardians”, instead of his frequently used label as “owner” (Katz 74). Showing that these activists do not believe we as humans should not have ownership over animals, but more of a shared living environment where everyone and everything is
Animal research is a very hot topic for many people. There are two sides to this argument, with both having strong opinions. One side is strongly against researching and testing done on animals, and the other side is strongly for testing and experimentation on animals.
Around the world animals such as dogs, mice, rabbits, cats, and many more are being used for cosmetic research, medical research, household product testing, and even government testing (PETA.org). This medical breakthrough was first discovered the year of 1922 when insulin was allowed to be isolated from dogs (About Animal Testing). Evidently, animals being used to test products in any way is still considered a rational way to test products when it is cruel, inhumane, and there are multiple alternatives that aren’t being used.
Testing on animals should not be enforced because animals have not done nothing to us humans. Since 1938 testing has been around and it all determines on what animal it is and what kind of testing they will go through. Animals are tested for a variety of things including cosmetics, human medication, and food products.
Animal testing, what is also known as animal experimentation is the use of animals in experiments that seek effects of human products.
A large issue is animal testing. “More than 25 million vertebrate animals are used in testing in the United States each year. When invertebrate animals are thrown into the mix, the estimated number rises to as high as 100 million.”(dosomething) The laboratory testing of animals is important to biomedical research, product safety testing, and education. Biomedical researchers use animals to extend their understanding of the workings of the body and the processes of disease and health, and to develop new vaccines and treatments for various diseases for humans and other animals. However, the morality, the necessity, or the validity of the studies are questionable. Thousands of animals are helplessly killed every year that animal testing is being conducted. “Ninety-four percent of animal testing is done to determine the safety of cosmetics and household products leaving only 6% for medical research” (about my planet). This can cause harm to the animals and may in turn be fatal. It is not fair nor is it humane to conduct experiments on animals to make sure a product or procedure is safe for us. There are no reasons to regard an animal’s life as if it is insignificant in contrast to a human life. During the testing, animals may be force fed or put in restraints in order for the scientists to get the product into their systems. Ani...
Although most people don’t believe non-human animals should have the same rights as humans, we should consider granting them more rights. The theory of animal rights is based upon the belief that animals deserve similar or equal rights to humans; the concept does not mean animals deserve the right to work or vote, but more of a right to live without being abused or having a torturous death. People who oppose animal rights believe that animals do not deserve even the basic rights considering they “lack mental or moral capacity,” Although people believe animals lack in such areas, they do not realize that animals can feel pain, loss, hurt and have thoughts of their own. If humans were treated the way animals are treated, we would beg for rights as well.