Animal Testing On Animals Essay

“How Many Rabbits Does Revlon Blind for Beauty’s Sake?” asked an advertisement on the cover of The New York Times. Due to the remarkable growth of the cosmetics industry these days, purchasing cosmetics is as simple as going to the grocery store. But not every consumer acknowledge of the pain and injuries that animals have to suffer for those products, as many cosmetic companies have performed various tests on animals during manufacture. Although some may find it necessary to use animals as experimental subjects, animal testing should not be allowed because of its cruelty and reliability.
One of the most significant threats posed by using animals to test cosmetics is animal cruelty. Manufactures would often perform tests on mice,

People believe that there are no alternatives to animal testing, so beauty products must be examined on animals before being introduced to their consumers. According to the U.S Food & Drug Administration (2015), “In some cases, after considering available alternatives, companies may determine that animal testing is necessary to assure the safety of a product or ingredient’’ (para. 4). In addition, cruelty-free labels that companies put on their products may be deceiving. Cosmetics companies may consume chemicals, formulas and ingredients tested on animals to manufacture cosmetics and still claim that their products are cruelty-free or that they are not tested on animals at that time (FDA, 2000). However, scientists have introduced various alternatives to animal testing that prove to be advantageous. As pointed out by Moran and Locke (2014), “these new methods use human blood, cell lines, artificial skin or computer models to test the safety of products” (para. 3). Many companies have adapted these alternatives to reduce or even abolish using animals as experimental subjects for their products. Both Avon Products Inc. and The Colgate-Palmolive Company have reported dramatic reduction in their animal usage (Feder, 1988). Moreover, advanced replacements are claimed to be more precise, less time-consuming and more