Animal Testing Is Cruel

873 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Why we should stop animal testing

Animal Testing
I believe animals were brought to this earth not for testing ,not for meat but for us to take care of them and have them as long life companion. Testing on innocent animals is cruel. Animals were made to be companions not for us to use them for our own benefits, Benefits that don't usually have the outcome or results we need and/or want. One example of this is the statistic that fifty to one hundred million animals die each year due to animal testing. Imagine how scared,weak,vulnerable an animal feels when they are beings strapped down and tested on. Then shoved in a small cage so they can wait for the unknowing results. Once the result doesn't go as planned they are either killed and tossed out like trash or are left there to …show more content…

Scientists keep trying a product on different breeds of animals while blaming the animals when it's their “new” products that is the problem. They will never understand what the animals go through everyday because they are too arrogant to look for another way to test products. George Wright states that “ some animal testing supporters argue that animals feel less or no pain at all compared to humans. Which is false because some animals have the same nerve structure , meaning they do indeed feel pain.” Just like us humans. George questions “does the squeal of a pig , or the yelp of a puppy indicate less pain than and “ouch” of a …show more content…

While testing on animals people don't ever understand or acknowledge how closely related to the chimpanzees we are. Even though the test hardly work on them it is true. Most to all scientist believe that humans began and came from evolution coming from some toe of monkey possibly a chimp. If it's so okay to test on chimps why don't they test on humans like they do with the animals. I mean they do believe we came from them in the beginning. George Wright shares “what is it about those details of the genome the four percentage points in the the DNA sequence that separate the two species that make it acceptable to conduct test on chimpanzees but unacceptable or immoral to do the same thing to

Show More
Related

  • Animal Testing Dbq

    597 Words  | 2 Pages

    One must remember that scientists who carry out animal testing are human to and most definitely do feel some sense of guilt using these animals for the sole reason to benefit mankind. However, “if there were good alternatives to animals that worked better or as well, for less money and hassle, scientists would use them” (Source D). Many believe that animals testing is wrong, but they must understand that at the current time there is no other option. It is difficult to find a different practice has been so substantial and has improved millions of lives and society as a whole. Animal testing, though the testing on animals may not be the best option, the after effects of testing has been successful over the past decades and will continue on this path as scientists and researchers gain more knowledge. There may be a point in time that society becomes so better off that there would be no more need to test

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Cruel And Inhumane

    532 Words  | 2 Pages

    Over 100 Million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in testing labs every year. Animals are used to test the safety of products, advance scientific research, and develop models to study disease and to develop new medical treatments, all for the sake of mankind. Animals should not be used for scientific research because animal testing is inhumane, other testing methods now exist, and animals are very different from human beings. While animal testing has led to many life-saving cures, animal testing is cruel and inhumane because it involves inflicting pain and harm on the test subject to study its effects and remedies. Testing involves physically restraining, force-feeding, and depriving animals of food and water.

    Read More

  • The Necessities of Animal Experimentation

    1270 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...Because people see animal testing procedures as unethical and immoral, it’s important for them to consider what their health would be like without the process—potentially afflicted with incurable illnesses. Continuing the animal experimenting process can only prove beneficial in promoting fewer ailments and cures to existing and future diseases.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

    1193 Words  | 3 Pages

    “According to Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and "killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, or other means.”(Peta). Have you ever wondered if a product you own was safe to use? Did you know that millions of animals are tested on each year for the daily products you use? According to Peta, around 26 million animals are tested each year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and healthcare uses (Peta). Animals are harmed or sometimes even killed in this process. Animals are not the same as humans, therefore; the testing done on Animals is not helping our human society, it’s hurting the animals. There are alternative ways to performing testing rather than testing on animals.

    Read More

  • The Unseen Cruelty: A Critique on Animal Testing

    1045 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hurting an animal is better than hurting a fellow human being right? Well imagine a child being ripped away from his mother in today’s society, for no reason. Would that be considered okay, or kidnapping? Imagine humans being forced to breed, just so their children can be tortured for makeup or a new facial wash. Would that be considered okay, or morally incorrect? People do not see animals as fellow living things, because they do not have the power to say no like a person can. They can’t stand up for themselves, leaving the people of the world to do it for them. Seeing that there are other ways to test out consumer products, why harm defenseless, breathing, loving, beings? With all things considered, animal testing “has no place in science today” (Goodall, 1).

    Read More

  • Ethical Dilemma: Animal Testing in Medical Research

    831 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every year about 100 million animals suffer through being poisoned, shocked, and burned for unsuccessful medical research. Some may believe that animal testing is a crucial part to medical research and should be used more frequently. Others believe the pain and suffering inflicted upon the animals is morally wrong and should not be done, no matter what benefits come from it.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing is Wrong!

    938 Words  | 2 Pages

    Picture yourself in a testing laboratory; needles, drugs, and knives pointed in your direction with you having no idea what’s going on around you, this is how animals everyday are treated, we have to stop this now! Millions of animals are killed in laboratories everyday with no chance to object to what the testers are about to do to them. Animals feel as much pain as humans do so why does it make it okay to test on them when they are so alike to humans? Every day people test makeup, shampoos, and medicines on animals, the strange thing is that animals have different skin, hair, and internal organs than humans have. Since the animals have different internal organs than humans only 5-25% of the testing results are agreeable between animals and humans. Humans don’t allow animals to have the right to say that they don’t want to be tested on, but humans have the rights to say they do or do not want to be tested on. There are many non-animal alternatives that humans can use to test products, but many testers refuse to use them. Do you think that these animals enjoy being tested on?! Animals are being tormented everyday in laboratories, animal testing must stop!

    Read More

  • Animal Testing is Cruel and Flawed

    1229 Words  | 3 Pages

    Animal testing is the use of non-human animals for scientific experimentation. There are estimates that 50 to 100 million vertebrate animals worldwide from zebra fish to on-human primates are used annually. Much larger numbers of invertebrates are used even flies and worms are used has model organisms are very important, experiments on invertebrates are largely unregulated and not included in statistics. Animals are euthanized after being used in a experiment. Some of these animals are purpose-bred and others are caught in the wild or they are supplied by dealers who obtain them from auctions and pounds. The testing on the animals are conducted inside universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, farms, defense establishments and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to industry. Some of the tests that researchers do on the animals are biomedical research transplantation, drug testing and toxicology test, cosmetics and other animals are used for directional research, breeding and defense research. Organizations like PETA and BUVA thinks it it not a necessity for this testings. They think is is cruel, poor scientific practice, poorly regulated and that animals used for experimentations have an intrinsic right not be be used for experimentation. Many Americans don’t agree with testing on animals. Testing animals is wrong and they are just poor helpless animals and they die every day. They are testing animals with products such has soap, household cleaners, drugs, cosmetics, pesticides and other chemicals. Drug tests that are done on animals that pass the test end up harming or killing humans. Lists of animals that get tested daily are cats, dogs, monkeys, mice, and rabbits. The researchers test these ...

    Read More

  • Cosmetic Testing with Animals is Cruel

    1300 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Cruelty of Cosmetic Testing on Animals Each year, thousands of animals are brutally tortured in laboratories, in the name of cosmetic research. A movement to ban animal testing for cosmetic purposes has been gaining popularity, with many companies hopping on the bandwagon against this research. New alternatives have been developed to eliminate the need to test on animals. This is only a small beginning of what is necessary to end these immoral acts. Animal testing in cosmetics is useless and cruel, and can be accomplished by other methods of research to end the suffering of animals.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: We Must Eliminate Animal Testing

    613 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is a moral blind spot in the treatment of animals that enable us to justify the cruelties for the perceived benefits of humans. Animals are living things. They have lungs which breathe, hearts which beat, and blood that flows. In fact, animals sense of smell, sight, and sound is much more acute than our own. Therefore, we can assume that their sensitivity to pain is at least equal to ours. According to Hippocrates, “The soul is the same in all living creatures, although the body of each is different.” This can go with the Duty Theory that states that every individual gets treated the same. The intentions of animal testing is not to harm the animals, but that is exactly what it does.

    Read More

  • The Barbaric Nature of Animal Testing

    898 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every year thousands of mice, dogs, primates and other animals are victims of vivisection all over the world. These experiments are inhumane, ineffective, and absolutely pointless when there are alternate testing methods. These animals undergo painful suffering, and sometimes death as a result of scientific research into the effects of drugs, cosmetics, food additives, and other chemical products.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Animal Testing

    985 Words  | 2 Pages

    The laws in place Protect about five percent of the animals around the world from being tested and experimented on and restrict certain ways of testing. Sadly, the other ninety five percent of those animals are the animals that are most commonly tested on and were the most commonly used animals for testing even before the laws were put into place. “The AWA does not cover rats, mice, fish and birds, which comprise around 95% of the animals used in research, the AWA covered 1,134,693 animals used for testing in fiscal year 2010, which leaves around 25 million other animals that are not covered” (top pro con arguments). Luckily scientists have found new ways to do the Tests they have been running on animals in a laboratory setting or out of a petri dish, but the results they get are considered inconclusive because it's not on a living organism or human like condition. “Testing, such as studying cell cultures in a petri dish, can produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells can be used” (Top pro con arguments). Animals are poor test subjects to relate to humans because Animals are not built the same way humans are. “The anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings” (Paul Furlong).” But are animals actually treated like humans in the first place? There are also no laws in place to restrict how animals are

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Inhumane

    1170 Words  | 3 Pages

    Also, the animals often undergo extreme pain and suffering, like breaking an arm or leg, as researchers inflict pain on them to test remedies, often times ending in lost lives. Correspondingly, many animals in the United States are subjected to this torture: “More than 100 million animals suffer and die in the U.S. every year in cruel chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics tests as well as in medical training exercises and curiosity-driven medical experiments at universities” (Peta n.pag.). The large number of animals in the United States dying per year is extensive and outstanding, considering most of the animals die due to the harsh chemicals or body experiments. The animal tests are done for a variety of experiments, but the amount of lost lives outweighs any of the benefits of these tests. 100 million animals dying per year from these serious tests shows how immense the issue is. Supporters of animal testing would argue that the safety of humans is more important than animals, so if the animals are dying, at least it is not humans. Although this may be true, according to ProCon.org, “The anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings” (ProCon Researchers n.pag.). Testing on the animals proves to lack actual results that can help scientists to create a helpful product or drug because the anatomies of humans and animals are very different, and they react in different ways. Henceforth, testing on animals should not be

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Is Unnecessary

    497 Words  | 1 Pages

    One reason why many people support animal testing is that humans and animals are very similar genetically. According to the California Biomedical Research Association “All animals have similar organs, such as the heart,lungs and liver.”They all function the same way as our organs do. If you didn't know, most animals that are tested are mice and rats. Mice and rats are genetically 98 percent similar to humans. Also humans and animals can carry the same diseases (Why we Should accept animal testing). H.I.V, A.I.D.S, arthritis ,diabetes and cancer are just a few of the diseases that humans and animals both acquire. If you say that animal testing is unnecessary; that is not a factual statement. There is a multitude of evidence to contradict that statement.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Should be Banned

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animals are used in research to develop new medicines and for scientists to test the safety of the medicines. This animal testing is called vivisection. Research is being carried out at universities, medical schools and even in primary and elementary schools as well as in commercial facilities which provide animal experiments to industry. (UK Parliament) In addition, animals are also used in cosmetic testing, toxicology tests, “defense research” and “xenotransplantation”. All around the world, a huge amount of animals are sentenced to life in a laboratory cage and they are obliged to feel loneliness and pain. In addition scientists causing pain, most drugs that pas successfully in animals fail in humans. It is qualified as a bad science. Above all, animals have rights not to be harmed even though the Animal Welfare Act does not provide them even with minimal protection. The law does not find it necessary to use current alternatives to animals, even if they are obtainable. Animal testing should be banned due to animal rights, ethical issues, alternative ways and the unreliability of test results in humans.

    Read More

More about Animal Testing Is Cruel

Open Document