When one thinks about animal testing, they usually would think about how much medical breakthroughs animal testing has delivered to society. Other people, however, have different thoughts, and may oppose it, as they believe animal testing is unethical. Animal testing has introduced many medical breakthroughs; rare diseases such as polio, mumps, rubella, and hepatitis would be much more common in modern society if it were not for animal testing (Cook). However, many technological advances are starting to reduce the need to test on innocent animals. Despite its positive history of its many medical discoveries, animal testing should not be tolerated as it is unethical, costly, ignorant, and because many cheaper and more reliable alternatives have been created. Many people are against animal testing, whereas many people also support animal testing. Many products must be tested before they are exposed to humans, from cosmetics, drugs, and to plastic bags. Famous make up companies, such as ‘L’Oreal’ and even ‘Glade’ tests on animals, while companies such as ‘Burt’s Bees’ and ‘Mary Kay’ do not test on animals (“Beauty”). The foremost reason people are against animal testing is because animals are tested without their consent. Many animals go through pain, discomfort, and even death in these experiments. Some people who support animal testing refer to the fact that animal testing has obviously made many major medical discoveries. Also, support of animal testing is aimed to the protection of humans. Most scientists believe that humans are superior to animals, and that animals should be tested, although they do not necessarily agree with it (Dance). However, most agree that scientists should try to decrease the suffering animals go throu... ... middle of paper ... ... innocent rabbits, along with money and provide more accurate results (“Alternatives”). Animal testing has a positive past, but is extremely controversial. Many people agree and disagree with it. Modern society would be suffering from rare diseases without it, including tuberculosis and polio. Many companies, from cosmetic companies to home improvement companies test their products on animals. Many animal tests often require animals to be killed, and/or experience pain, discomfort, and isolation. Many countries around the world are looking to stop animal testing, and many alternatives that are cheaper, more accurate, and humane exist and are being improved. Animal testing is no longer needed in our world, as many cheaper, humane, faster, and more reliable alternatives have been discovered and may even improve, which can eliminate animal testing once and for all.
One must remember that scientists who carry out animal testing are human to and most definitely do feel some sense of guilt using these animals for the sole reason to benefit mankind. However, “if there were good alternatives to animals that worked better or as well, for less money and hassle, scientists would use them” (Source D). Many believe that animals testing is wrong, but they must understand that at the current time there is no other option. It is difficult to find a different practice has been so substantial and has improved millions of lives and society as a whole. Animal testing, though the testing on animals may not be the best option, the after effects of testing has been successful over the past decades and will continue on this path as scientists and researchers gain more knowledge. There may be a point in time that society becomes so better off that there would be no more need to test
Animal testing has been used for developing and researching cures for medical conditions. For example, the polio vaccine, chemotherapy for cancer, insulin treatment for diabetes, organ transplants and blood transfusions are just some of the important advances that have come from research on animals (“Animal Testing”). Consuming animals for research benefits in developing various treatments and also benefits in discovery better methods for cures. According to the article “Animal Testing”, it says that the underlying rationale for the use of animal testing is that living organisms provide interactive, dynamic systems that scientists can observe and manipulate in order to understand normal and pathological functioning as well as the effectiveness of medical interventions. It relies on the physiological and anatomical similarities between humans and other animals (MacClellan, Joel). Meaning that animals have the same body components and features as humans and is the best thing to research on to better understand the human development. Even though several argue that animal testing is harming the animals, one has to think back to all the benefits that has come from it. There may be a little remorse for endangering animal lives, but realizing how far medicine has come makes it worth the while.
Throughout history, beginning as early as 500 BC, animals have been used to test products that will later be utilized by humans (“Animal Testing” 4), what isn’t publicly discussed is the way it will leave the animals after the process is done. Many innocent rabbits, monkeys, mice, and even popular pets such as dogs are harmed during the testing application of cosmetics, medicine, perfumes, and many other consumer products (Donaldson 2). Nevertheless, there are many people whom support the scandal because "it is a legal requirement to carry out animal testing to ensure they are safe and effective” for human benefit (Drayson). The overall question here is should it even be an authorized form of experimentation in the United States, or anywhere else? The fact of the matter is that there are alternatives to remove animals out of the equation for good (“Alternatives” 1). They are cheaper, and less invasive than the maltreatment of the 26 million innocent animals that are subjected to the heartlessness of testing each year (“Animal Testing” 4). All in all, due to the harsh effects of animal testing, it should be treated as animal cruelty in today’s society.
Without animal testing, products would be based on theory. No one would want to use something, which may damage the eyes, be poisonous, cancerous, and cause birth defects. Animals used in testing are not from the endangered species list; many of the types of animals used are killed each year by rat or mouse traps, animal control, exterminators, and animal shelters. Animal testing reaps great benefits, such as finding effective drugs to combat disease, improve surgical procedures, and make products safer. When someone goes to the store and buys a product, or is prescribed medication, they don’t have to worry if the product is safe to use, nor should they.
Using animals in research and to test the safety of products has been a topic of heated debate for decades. According to data collected by F. Barbara Orlans for her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, sixty percent of all animals used in testing are used in biomedical research and product-safety testing (62). People have different feelings for animals; many look upon animals as companions while others view animals as a means for advancing medical techniques or furthering experimental research. However individuals perceive animals, the fact remains that animals are being exploited by research facilities and cosmetics companies all across the country and all around the world. Although humans often benefit from successful animal research, the pain, the suffering, and the deaths of animals are not worth the possible human benefits. Therefore, animals should not be used in research or to test the safety of products.
Animal testing has long played a part in the science of testing, and it still plays a very important role in the medical world. Testing on animals in order to create a cure for AIDS is one thing, but testing on animals for human vanity is another. Animal testing is used to test the safety of a product. It has kept some very unsafe substances out of the cosmetic world. However, in this day in age, animal testing is not the only way to test the safety of a product. Animal testing in cosmetics has decreased over the years. However, it is still used by many companies in America. Animal testing is not only cruel, but it is also unnecessary in today’s advanced scientific world.
Animal testing has a long and ugly history in our society, beginning with the early Greeks, Arabs, and Romans, and continuing into this century. It has been a controversial topic since its development, but objections have been steadily rising since the mid to late nineteenth century. As more companies emerged during the industrial revolution, more animals were used to test products, and more complaints were voiced in animal rights groups, and rightly so. Animal testing endangers the lives and well-being of numerous animals, and is not as advantageous as it seems. First of all, up to 95% of animals are not protected by the Animal Welfare Act, which exempts rats, mice, fish and birds. Additionally, animal tests do not always accurately portray the effects that the product would have on humans. Many chemicals are detrimental to
Every day, there are thousands of animals being tested on all over the world for the benefit of human beings. In response, due to moral objections, organizations like PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), and the HSUS (The Humane Society of the United States) have formed to protest against the use of animals and to find alternatives to testing on these creatures. Yet, the use of animals in the lab has led to many medical breakthroughs like the artificial heart and the smallpox vaccine, which have improved and/or lengthened the lives of individuals everywhere. Accordingly, a debate has arisen about the need for animal testing and whether it has a place in today’s world.
Animal testing is a very controversial topic, especially among animal rights activists. Unsually, animal testing is used to test pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and many other products that humans use in their everyday life. Scientists use animals in medical research more as a matter of tradition, as opposed to the fact that testing on animals has proved to fail time after time again. Animal testing has proved to be less accurate and unsuccessful in comparison to other means of testing and experimentation. There is a growing awareness to the limitations of animal research and its inability to be a reliable source of predictions about human health.
More than 100 million animals worldwide are used for testing annually, and about a quarter of those animals die from being over tested. Animal testing is the use of animals for cosmetics, medical, biological, or psychological knowledge. Although gaining this knowledge is important, animals are put through pain, stress, and suffering in the process of experimentation. Animal Testing has been used for centuries, and as a result many animals are dying. If animals continue to be used for experimentation, then the amount of animals that are killed each year will continue to increase by the millions. By banning animal testing and finding new ways to test products, the animals that are killed each year will decrease.
Animal testing has been a part of our daily experiments in today’s modern lifestyle. Scientists all around the world and across the past centuries have used animals including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, monkeys, fish, and birds as objects to test on products before manufacturing and producing them for people to use. Such products may include; chemicals, drugs, food as well as cosmetics. In 1876 Britain was the first country to introduce animal testing; and used it in laboratories as a method to prevent any harmful diseases or infections after the use of the products (Christopher 2008). Even though this method is not used by countries all over the world, it is still a factor that has protected and saved many lives. People who are not supporting animal testing believe that the only reason why animal testing should not be present is because it’s very inhuman. Yet there are
Each year, over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, and abused for animal testing just in the US. Even then, that number does not include 90% of animals that are used in the tests. Animal testing is defined as “procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research,” by Humane Society International. This should be banned, or at the bare minimum reduced by laws that are enforced, and there are many reasons why. Some of the reasons include the unreliability and impracticability of animal testing, the cruel environments the animals are in, and the unecessity of animal testing.
Our case is that if we don’t test on animals then progress in scientific fields would be halted. As first speaker for the negative I will speak about the benefits of animal testing in general and then I’ll talk in detail about animal testing in medicine. My second speaker will talk about the opinions on testing and the food chain and my third speaker will summarise our points and rebut.
What is an animal tested product? Is it a medicine? Or is it a cosmetic?Some people might think animal tested products as complicated stuffs. In fact, animal tested products are easily found around our lives. As animal testing is available in many uses, it has a long history and has been controversial for many years. Those who insist on abolition of experiments for animals argue that alternatives for animal testing exist. In addition, the protesters think that human’s anatomy and that of an animal are very different.Therefore, they argue that applying test results from animal testing is meaningless. Also they say that animal testing must be abolished because of ethical issues. Those who are against animal testing cite it as a cruel and immoral practice. They believe animal testing is not different from animal abuse. However there are reasons why humankind cannot stop testing animals. Animal testing is inevitable for three reasons: provision of essential data, contribution to humanity and guarantee of animal rights.
In conclusion, animal testing has been overused for too long. Nothing essential has been the outcome of it, and no scientific breakthrough has stopped anything from damaging us. The many, many animals are mistreated, many times killed. They need to begin to establish a more protective act, just like the AWA, however this time, it should strive to protect the majority of the animals used, so they can live safely. Finally, if we are able to find and develop successful alternatives to all animal testing, it might be gone forever. If all of these things can come together and make it happen, we may be able to see the day where all animals are treated ethically and with sheer, utter, respect.