Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The ethics of animal rights
Animal rights philosophy
Human rights and animal rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The ethics of animal rights
"Animal rights - moral or legal entitlements attributed to nonhuman animals, usually because of the complexity of their cognitive, emotional, and social lives or their capacity to experience physical or emotional pain or pleasure." (Britannia encyclopedia online, n.d.). The definition of animal rights is so clear to us. Human rights need to be protected, so do animal rights. In 1976, in New York City, thousands of cat lovers were beaten when they heard a painful test to be taken for pets’ sexual behavior. Henry Spira, the leader of animal rights movement, helped to mobilize a protest and marked the beginning of the contemporary animal rights movement. The group took dramatic and public action to express their concerns and anger. They were eager in their language, tactics, and methods of appealing new recruits to the cause of animal rights approach (Jasper & Nelkin, 1992, p. 26). This essay will discuss how people deal with animals and what animal rights people should respect and protect. What have people done to animals? Humans hunt animals and use animals as the subject of experiments. Firstly, it would be unreasonable to choose to deprive an animal life to serve a non-vital human interest. For example, hunting. The course of hunting involves killing animals, and killing will inevitably lead to defeat of all the important interest of animals (Rowlands, 2002, p. 160). According to WAF fact sheets, more than 200 million animals are killed each year in the U.S.. Hunters are permitted killing animals on 60% of U.S. Land, such as wildlife refuges, national forest, and state parks. Even, 80 percent of them do killing on public land. Most hurters do not meet or promote basic human interests (Hunting fact sheet, n.d.). Therefore,... ... middle of paper ... ...(n.d.). Britannia encyclopedia online. Retrieved November 28, 2009. From http://www.search.eb.com/failedlogin?target=/ Cohen, C. & Regan, T. (2001). The animal rights debate. The U.S.A.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Dolan, K. (1999). Ethics, animals and science. Great Britain: MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall. Hunting fact sheet. (n.d.). World animal foundation. Retrieved November 30, 2009. From http://worldanimalfoundation.homestead.com/FactSheetHunting.html Jasper, J, M. & Nelkin, D. (1992). The Animal rights crusade: the growth of a moral protest. The U.S.A.: The Free Press. Monamy, V. (2000). Animal experimentation: a guide to the issues. Cambridge: The press syndicate of the University of Cambridge. Rowlands, M. (2002). Animals like us. The UK and the U.S.A.: Verso. Shapiro, L, S. (2000). Applied animal ethics. The U.S.A.: Cengage Learning.
Regan, Tom. “The Case for Animal Rights.” In Animal Rights and Human Obligations, 2 ed.. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1989.
...nimal rights yet I do question myself where to draw the line. I do not condone violence or harm against animals, yet I shudder at the thought of a mice plague and feel saddened by the extinction of our native animals by ‘feral’ or pest species. Is it right to kill one species to save another? I am appalled by the idea of ‘circus’ animals yet I will attend the horse races every summer for my entertainment. I think Tom Regan’s argument and reasoning for animal rights was extremely effective at making whoever is reading the essay question his or her own moral standards. Reading the essay made me delve into my own beliefs, morals and values which I think is incredibly important. To form new attitudes as a society it is important we start questioning how we view the lives of others, do we see animals as a resource to be exploited or as equals with rights just like we do?
First of all, why do we have the right to kill animals? Who gave us permission to do it? Animals’ lives should be respected like ours, after all we were all created with a purpose. Each one of us has the same right to live because we all form part of what is called “food chain”. For example if we had no grass what would antelopes eat? With no antelopes what would lions eat? And so on. It doesn’t make any sense to me how we are killing them not to survive but to have fun. I don’t think is fair either that because they are under us in the food chain we can do whatever we want with them, equality is for all kinds of creatures. Like Ann Causey, stated in Governor's Symposium on North America's Hunting Heritage in 1992: "Does killing an animal primarily to obtain a trophy demonstrate respect for that anima...
Regan, Tom. “The Case for Animal Rights.” In Defense of Animals. Ed. Peter Singer. New York:
As an advocate of animal rights, Tom Regan presents us with the idea that animals deserve to be treated with equal respect to humans. Commonly, we view our household pets and select exotic animals in different regard as oppose to the animals we perceive as merely a food source which, is a notion that animal rights activists
The Case for Animal Rights. Routledge, London-New York, 1988. Regan T. The Struggle for Animal Rights. International Society for Animal Rights.
Over the years, many differences have been proposed. Some theorize that rights depend upon the ability to possess interest, which in turn depend upon the ability to form verbal formulations, for example. If this were so, then it would rule out the possibility of rights for most animals, with maybe the exception of some primates. But, as Rodd states, ?beings incapable of possessing genuine rights might possess moral status in virtue of other qualities, such as the capacity for suffering? (Rodd 4). So, it is easily seen how many views have accumulated over time. The task of determining animal rights has also come into the context of examining these inherent differences on qualitative and quantitative levels.
Most of modern societies nowadays have laws protecting animal rights; however, there are countries where animal rights do not exist or are protected. Cape Verde and many other third world countries, do not have any laws that protect animals rights. Cape Verde is an under development country, composed by ten islands, situated in the west coast of Africa. Majority of its territory is rural, and its citizens treat animals more as a property than anything else. I was born and lived in Cape Verde, as a child I was not very social, and my parents were always at work; in order, to solve the lonely and antisocial problem, my dad gave me my first dog, she was my best friend for
"The Case For Animal Rights" written by Tom Regan, promotes the equal treatment of humans and non-humans. I agree with Regan's view, as he suggests that humans and animals alike, share the experience of life, and thus share equal, inherent value.
Tom Regan, “The Case for Animal Rights,” in In Defense of Animals, ed. Peter Singer (Oxford:
A. A. “The Case Against Animal Rights.” Animal Rights Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. Janelle Rohr. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1989.
Doesn’t it kill you to see a movie and see an animal get killed or just hurt in it? Good thing that’s all special effects. Back in the day, around 1966, movies didn’t always use special effects. Khartoum, a movie based on a holy war in the Sudan desert, directed by Basil Dearden and Eliot Elisofon, used horses a great deal, but did not use the special effects in order to not hurt the animals. Many horses died in the making of this movie, as well as others, even including a major hit, Ben-Hur. Today, there are many activist groups that fight for and about the unfair treatment and protection for animals in everyday life. The People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is one of these groups. PETA was founded in 1980, and since then has been working on getting the point across to the public that animals “are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, or use for entertainment.” (PETA: Official Page). PETA also focuses on educating policymakers and the public about the abuse of animals and making it known that animals deserve the right to be treated with respect.
Background: The issue concerning cat’s rights is closely associated with animal rights and the factor concatenated with animal rights and the
I believe that if an animal that is causing a great amount of suffering to the animals that live in an ecosystem, then it is ok to kill the animal that is causing the suffering. I know that you will be causing pain to a species, but compared to the amount of suffering that would happen to the rest of the animals, this is far less. Another argument against my thought would be how would we be able to in account everyone’s intrinsic value with the animal welfare approach. Showing how if we look at the good of all, then we could possibly end up harming animal with intrinsic value. Instead of looking at what has intrinsic value or not however. What needs to be considered, like mentioned before, is the welfare of the rest of the animals in an ecosystem. If we keep one animals alive due to its intrinsic value, but that animal kill off the rest of the animals in an ecosystem. Then, what about the intrinsic value of the rest of the animals? Which is why I believe that bringing the overall greatest amount of happiness to an entire ecosystem is far greater than worrying about the rights of each animal, even if that means bringing some suffering to an animal species. I believe that we should kill an animal species if it brings a great amount of suffering to an ecosystem, only if it can cause a greater amount of
Herzog, H. A. (1993). “The movement is my life”: The psychology of animal rights activism. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 103-119.