Animal Research A Necessary Evil Or Just Evil?

1242 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Animals be used for research

Is experimenting on animals cruel and unethical, or is it a necessary evil? Those against, argue that animal research is unreliable, archaic and a waste of money. There are many activist that lobby to make animal research illegal. I disagree with making animal research illegal. I agree that we have come a long way with technology, and technology has offered many alternatives to animal research but unfortunately, there are still some circumstances where animal testing is necessary. If we stop using animals in research, we are limiting our ability to fight disease, and ultimately endangering ourselves. Animal testing is necessary for our safety. Scientist need to investigate whether a drug is safe for human ingestion and also whether the drug is effective. No animal testing was done on a drug called Elixir Sulfanilamide (Hajar). This drug was responsible for "mass poisoning causing the deaths of more than a hundred people" (Hajar). This event and other similar tragedies led to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act mandating animal testing as a requirement before human testing (Hajar). Dr. Rachel Hajar author of "Animal Testing and Medicine" stated" [t]he above-mentioned incidents and others illustrate the harm to humans from the use of substances that have not been first tested on animals and underline the importance of animal experimentation to avert or prevent human tragedy." Animals make better test subject than humans because they "have a shorter life cycle than humans", and as a result, they can be studied throughout their whole life span or across several generations" (CBRA). Another valid point to make is that with human testing it is extremely difficult for scientist to manage all of the variables that co... ... middle of paper ... ...mal Research: How It Benefits Both Humans and Animals." It's about pets. California Veterinary Medical Association, 2005. Web. 18 Mar. 2014. CBRA. "Why Are Animals Necessary in Biomedical Research?" Ca-biomed.org. CBRA, n.d. Web. 18 Mar. 2014. . England, Rich. "Would Drugs Be Safe For Us Without First Being Tested On Animals?" Safer Medicines. Safer Medicines, 2012. Web. 18 Mar. 2014. Hajar, Rachel. " Animal Testing and Medicine." Heart Views 12.1 (2011) : 42. NCBI. Web. 18 Mar. 2014. . Parry, Vivienne. "What Have Guinea Pigs Ever Done For Us?" Guardian Newspaper. Guardian Newspaper, 1 Sept. 2005. Speaking Of Research. Web. 18 Mar. 2014.

Show More
Related

  • Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

    1261 Words  | 3 Pages

    Point of view: Web. 14 February 2016. The article provides specific examples of illnesses and diseases which have been cured by animal testing that both humans and animals have benefitted from. This supports my topic of animal experiments being used for medical advancements. Pointing out that law often requires that products be tested before being sold to the public, George and Wagner additionally help prove my claim that product testing is a purpose of animal experimentation.

    Read More

  • Why Animal Testing Isn't Always Representative of What Will Happen in Humans

    1334 Words  | 3 Pages

    Testing animals is used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medicinal drugs, check the safety of products intended for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and healthcare roles. The earliest recordings of animal studies date back to Aristotle, who discovered the anatomical differences among animals by analyzing them (Introduction). Advocates of animal testing say that it has enabled the growth of numerous medical advancements, tests to see if new products are save for mankind, acquisition of new scientific knowledge, and because it is accurate (B). Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to try out on animals, many animals die from the animal testing, it’s unethical, animals don’t have a say in it, the accuracy is in question because they are testing animals and not humans, and the toll of animal testing is high (B). Through the pros and cons of everything, it is bad to test animals because animals are very different from human beings and thus make poor test subjects and are unreliable, the cost and upkeep of it is expensive, and because there are alternatives to animal testi...

    Read More

  • animal experimentation

    545 Words  | 2 Pages

    “An Examination of Animal Experiments.” Physician Committee for Responsible Medicine. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Feb. 2014. .

    Read More

  • The Necessities of Animal Experimentation

    1270 Words  | 3 Pages

    Putting aside the countless claims that animal experimentation is unethical and should be banned, it is incredibly necessary and useful for mankind. Experimenting on humans is inhumane and completely immoral, while animals that do not function in the same way humans do should be used in medical research and to test the safety of various products. If animal testing were illegal, how would worldly corporations determine the safety of products? Surely the valuable lives of human beings are not essential to risk, hence the reason that animal experimenting is necessary. In addition, medical research would be in great jeopardy if were animals were not permitted to be experimented on. Medical industries have already come so far in treating multiple ailments due to the tests performed on animals. Alas, it is safe to say that for the continued thriving of our society, forbidding animal experimentation would be detrimental.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

    845 Words  | 2 Pages

    One reason that animal testing is beneficial is that animals can sometimes make better research subjects then humans because of their shorter life cycles. For example, laboratory mice only live for two to three years, so researchers can study the side effects of the tests that are preformed over a whole lifespan, which would not be possible ...

    Read More

  • The Necessity of Animal Testing

    980 Words  | 2 Pages

    The roots of animal experimentation began in the early 1600s when the world expressed in interests on the functions of animals and their uses in human life. However, it wasn’t until the incident regarding the drug thalidomide in 1960 did the government make it a requirement for drugs be tested on animals. During the incident, millions of women took the medication believing that it would be a source of relieve from morning sickness, not knowing however that it would cause irrevocable effects on their unborn children (Watson 4). Although the ruling seemed to provide a sigh of relief to some, the very idea of placing animals in strange uncomfortable environments and experiencing pain and euthanasia angered many. According to the American Anti-Vivisection Society, commonly known as AAVS, It is wrong to treat animals as objects for the purpose of scientific research, and to cause them pain and suffering (“Animal Research Is Unethical and Scientifically Unnecessary”). Although the arguments against animal experimentation seem credible, animal testing on medicines and products are necessary in order to insure the safety of human beings.

    Read More

  • The Unseen Cruelty: A Critique on Animal Testing

    1045 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout history, beginning as early as 500 BC, animals have been used to test products that will later be utilized by humans (“Animal Testing” 4), what isn’t publicly discussed is the way it will leave the animals after the process is done. Many innocent rabbits, monkeys, mice, and even popular pets such as dogs are harmed during the testing application of cosmetics, medicine, perfumes, and many other consumer products (Donaldson 2). Nevertheless, there are many people whom support the scandal because "it is a legal requirement to carry out animal testing to ensure they are safe and effective” for human benefit (Drayson). The overall question here is should it even be an authorized form of experimentation in the United States, or anywhere else? The fact of the matter is that there are alternatives to remove animals out of the equation for good (“Alternatives” 1). They are cheaper, and less invasive than the maltreatment of the 26 million innocent animals that are subjected to the heartlessness of testing each year (“Animal Testing” 4). All in all, due to the harsh effects of animal testing, it should be treated as animal cruelty in today’s society.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Essay

    1209 Words  | 3 Pages

    Current animal testing has been a contentious subject ever since it started off 150 years back. Although a lot of people discover animal testing inhumane and egoistic, it is a important factor to boost our understanding of medication and to improve our understanding of science. Animal testing, to some, is the way to ameliorating our level of living and preserving many lives, and therefore has many benefits. On the other hand, the negatives may not be passed, and scientists are constantly trying to decrease the damages with some methods they create in the process. Even so, to the dismay of numerous animal lovers in addition to those who are endeavoring for animal rights, animal testing will not be stopped every time soon because, for now, it is the most trustworthy form of testing that includes the safety of daily products we use more carefully than any other procedure.

    Read More

  • Medical Beneifits Of Animal Testing

    390 Words  | 1 Pages

    When someone goes to the store and buys a product, or is prescribed medication, they don’t have to worry if the product is safe to use nor should they. The entire human race benefits from animal research. “Without animal research, medical science would come to a total standstill”(O’Neil 210). It is not as if Scientist and researchers just sit in their labs all day and torture animals for fun. Not to mention animal use is being reduced as much as possible, “most scientist are glad to use alternative test because they are usually faster and cheaper than test on animals”(Yount 72). However, “you cannot study kidney transplantation or diarrhea or high bloodpressure on a computer screen”(O’Neil 212). Besides, “Animal research has led to vaccines against diptheria, rabies, tuberculosis, polio, measles, mumps, cholera, whooping cough, and rubella. It has meant eradication of smallpox, effective treatment for diabetes and control of infection with powerful antibiotics. The cardiac pacemaker, microsurgery to reattach severed limbs, and heart, kidney, lung, liver and other transplants are all possible because of animal research”(O’Neil 210).

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

    1170 Words  | 3 Pages

    Since experiments are cruel and expensive, “the world’s most forward-thinking scientists have moved on to develop and use methods for studying diseases and testing products that replace animals and are actually relevant to human health” (“Alternatives to Animals”). Companies claim that this sort of cruelty will benefit the human population by testing the “safety” of the products, as they have been for hundreds of years, and although this may have been helpful in the past, scientists have discovered otherwise. “While funding for animal experimentation and the number of animals tested on continues to increase, the United States still ranks 49th in the world in life expectancy and second worst in infant mortality in the developed world” (“Animal Testing Is”). This evidence shows that while we still continue to support and spend money on animal testing, it is not working as well as we thought.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Abuse

    1224 Words  | 3 Pages

    Animal testing is one the most beyond cruelty against animals. It is estimated about 7 million innocent animals are electrocuted, blinded, scalded, force-fed chemicals, genetically manipulated, killed in the name of science. By private institutions, households products, cosmetics companies, government agencies, educational institutions and scientific centers. From the products we use every day, such as soap, make-up, furniture polish, cleaning products, and perfumes. Over 1 million dogs, cats, primates, sheep, hamsters and guinea pigs are used in labs each year. Of those, over 86,000 are dogs and cat. All companies are most likely to test on animals to make patients feel safe and are more likely to trust medicines if they know they have been tested on animals first (PETA, N.D, page 1). These tests are done only to protect companies from consumer lawsuits. Although it’s not quite true, Humans and animals don’t always react in the same way to drugs. In the UK an estimated 10,000 people are killed or severely disabled every year by unexpected reactions to drugs, all these drugs have passed animal tests. Animal testing is often unpredictable in how products will work on people. Some estimates say up to 92 percent of tests passed on animals failed when tried on humans (Procon.org, 2014, page 1). Animal testing can’t show all the potential uses for a drug. The test results are...

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Animal Testing

    1934 Words  | 4 Pages

    All over the world, people continue to conduct tests on animals. Due to the minimum standards given, there is very little regulation

    Read More

  • Arranged Marriage Persuasive Speech

    629 Words  | 2 Pages

    Arranged Marriage. Does it really represent true love? According to Australian Government: Attorney-Generals Department, "Arranged marriage is a forced marriage is when a person gets married without freely and fully consenting, because they have been coerced, threatened or deceived." Arranged Marriages do not allow men and women to express themselves through marriage. The soon-to-be couple have no say of who they want to marry, their parents pick out a soulmate for them. In arranged marriage you're being forced to commit your life and heart to a complete stranger. In a love marriage the couple knows each other's strength and weaknesses. In an arranged marriage some don't know their spouse's background information and they don't know how to handle each other. Being forced to get marriage is not always everyone's first decision.

    Read More

  • Should Animal Testing Be Banned Essay

    713 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to the article” Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing,” animals’ rights are violated when the sciences are doing the research and there are many similar ways between humans and animals, such as how they feel and behave. Even though animals cannot express their opinions, they still feel, think, and experience pain. When the sciences use animals to do the research, humans still need to respect them because of animals’ rights. Animals have their opinions they cannot explain and humans have a duty to protect animals’ rights. Animal testing should be banned because humans need to respect their minds.

    Read More

  • Should Animals Be Used for Scientific Research?

    658 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...between animal research and medical benefit. Animal research is an important tool to develop new drugs or treatments and ensure the safety of the drugs. As a result, animal research is hard to be replacing by other research method. If animal research is banned, it will be a disaster for the biomedical research because most of the new medications cannot be test appropriately before releasing to the public. It may also increase the danger of the drugs. In fact, the government can make law and regulation to become more strictly on animal research. It is ironic that people who are against animal research, but at the same time they are enjoying the benefit of animal research, such as taking any drug which is tested on animals. Animal research is tricky ethical decision to make, but the benefit for human is so huge therefore animals should be allow to use for research

    Read More

More about Animal Research A Necessary Evil Or Just Evil?

Open Document