Animal Kingdom Nature Vs Nurture

1386 Words3 Pages

The title of David Michôd’s 2010 crime drama, Animal Kingdom, yields may ideas. Lion versus tiger, prey versus predator, nature versus nurture, and a mother who will stop at nothing to protect herself in a jungle full of hunters. Janine ‘Smurf’ Cody, the mother of a group of criminal offspring, will stop at nothing to protect herself by protecting those who protect her. Being the matriarch of the family, with no real husband figure, Smurf’s whole world revolves around her kids; they are all that she has. They are the reason for her existence and without them she is nothing. But what borders on incestuous and overbearing, lays a mother without fear, without principles, and the natural instinct to protect herself in the lawless world that they all live in; a world best described as the Animal Kingdom. One could argue that her devotion to her sons is simply natural instinct, a mother’s love and nurturing is completely expected, especially in a family of which already lost [all] of their fathers. But in the case of Smurf, …show more content…

Or did she? Smurf needed her boys for all the wrong reasons. She needs them not only for safety, but also for some love and affection and a sense of purpose. She was willing to do what she needed to do to keep the remaining members of the family alive and free to keep her out of harm’s reach. She needed them for a kiss when she needed love and she needed them to feel empowered. Without her sons Smurf would be nothing; she would have no army to rule or watch over. The only explanation is that Janine ‘Smurf” Cody is a sociopath. In the end, nothing emphasizes insanity like birthing three degenerate sons, all of whom you support and are abnormally defensive of, despite the fact that they're violent criminals. Janine ‘Smurf’ Cody’s behavior is often criminal, and lacks any sense of a moral responsibility or social conscience. Janine ‘Smurf’ Cody is the textbook definition of a

Open Document