Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Canada before and after confederation
Canada before and after confederation
Canadian confederation essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Canada before and after confederation
Critical in the development of a nation, the date of July 1st, 1867 has a connotation any other in Canadian history. A civic celebration of unification, the anniversary of Canadian Confederation is a nationwide display of history. Tainted by Anglocentric representation, the story of confederation has become biased. Furthering English hegemony, the exclusion of French-Canadian ideals from public commemorations has become overwhelming. Favouring homogenization, Canada's diversity has become streamlined through the Anglocentric presentation of Canadian Confederation. Unifying cultures, Canada's portrayal as an undivided country makes it lack a crucial perspective. The distortion of history through Anglocentrism has belittled, misrepresented and …show more content…
Presenting Anglophones as leaders, French-Canadians have their historical roles modified to conform to Anglocentric history. Wishing to ascend Macdonald to a level above Cartier and assert him as the sole Father of Confederation, Anglocentrism modifies the role of Cartier. Presented as conciliatory and objecting, Cartier is likened to a follower of Macdonald rather than a leader. This disgraceful modification is evident through the manipulation of Cartier's character in Historica Canada's Heritage Minutes. Highlighting the differences between the two figures, Cartier's conventional methods and demeanor are in stark contrast to Macdonald. Standing apart due to his rebellious tendencies, Macdonald's portrayal is one of a likeable and courageous leader. When questioned by Cartier, Macdonald brushes the Francophone off as it to silence a follower. Portraying Cartier as an objecting follower rather than an insightful partner, Historica Canada alludes to Macdonald's greater role in confederation. Favouring English hegemony, Historica Canada weakens the role of Cartier and strengthens Macdonald's in favour of Anglocentrism. Interpreted to fit Anglocentric ideals, bias also shadows Cartier in his own Heritage Minute. Modifying his character, Cartier's bold intentions are discounted in favour of an Anglocentric picture which presents him as a …show more content…
Perverting history in the public sphere, the distortion of Cartier's character has heightened the opinion of Macdonald. Recounted on a Kingston plaque as the frontrunner in Canadian historical memory, Macdonald's influence is further increased by casting aside his partner Cartier. As contended by Morgan, the memorialization of figures in Canadian history through physical tributes reflects the aspirations and sociopolitical influence of a group in Canadian society. Asserting Macdonald as the only Father of Confederation, English hegemony has presented history according to Anglocentric ideals. Detracting from the influence of Cartier in his hometown, Macdonald's statue in Montreal's Place du Canada stands twice life size. Underscoring the influence of Macdonald, the looming sculpture emphasizes Anglocentrism in public history. Presenting Macdonald as a figure greater than any other, the statue's central placement serves to remind citizens of English hegemony. Promoting the Anglophone figure, the statue calls to attention the professionalism of Macdonald through its style. Differing from Cartier's in Parc du Mont-Royal, the Macdonald Monument depicts him as a state dignitary with a document in hand. Contrasting Cartier's portrayal as a parliamentarian, Macdonald's underscores his status as the foremost figure in Canadian Confederation. Comparing Macdonald as a
In conclusion Canada gained independence because of a series of events that took place during the twentieth century. If it hadn’t been for these events, Canada to this day might have been a part of the British Empire. Through discussion on the Chanak affair we signalled that we wanted autonomy. Through our hard work and lives, the world knew we had the ability to stand alone as a strong nation. While, our international reputation of being a “peacekeeping” country the right to stand as an independent self-governing nation. But finally through the Canada Act, we stood solely independent from our Empire. It is obvious that the twentieth century provided us with great chances to become an independent strong nation.
"We must cherish our inheritance. We must preserve our nationality for the youth of our future. The story should be written down to pass on." (Louis Riel, 1884). Louis Riel, a man of great nature and abiding love for his western Métis heritage, is proven to be one of the most revolutionary men looked upon in the chronicles of the Dominion of Canada. In spite of this, he remains as one of the most controversial and cryptic figures throughout the course of Canadian history, leading to the question, is he recognized as the Father of Confederation or a treasonous rebel? A period of revolution lasting from the 1870’s to the late 1880’s was condemned with constant revolts justified as an intervening year for those involved; initiated by Riel. Although his actions may have struck him as a villain, Riel’s actions benefitted Canada greatly. Louis Riel is regarded as a hero by preserving the civil liberties and identities of the Métis and leading two memorable resistance movements against the Canadian government, in which to sustain their heritage. Louis Riel is claimed to be a valiant but flawed conqueror. However, despite all these flaws, he is known to be one of Canada’s national heroes, as he left a substantial impact on Canadian history as a dominant individual within civilization.
To start off, I’ll be writing about the life of people in British North America and its significance towards unifying Canada, as well as background knowledge of conflicts that existed. Life in British North America was changing at an alarming rate. New technology and services were being introduced such as railways and steamships. Industries such as building, producing and farming were being introduced. This was in part due to the many immigrants from Britain and France who’d settled. This was dreadful for the First Nations as their land had been taken away even more so than before. More resources were needed for the growing crowd so trade agreements were made. As more people came, the First Nations were even more distanced from the Europeans. Meanwhile, the French and the British wanted the other’s culture to be erased from the
Pierre Elliot Trudeau was arguably one of the most vivacious and charismatic Prime Ministers Canada has ever seen. He wore capes, dated celebrities and always wore a red rose boutonniere. He looked like a superhero, and often acted like one too. Some of the landmark occurrences in Canadian history all happened during the Trudeau era, such as patriating the constitution, creating the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the 1980 Quebec Referendum. However, it is Trudeau’s 1969 “white paper” and the Calder legal challenge which many consider to be one of his most influential contributions to Canadian history.
Although Quebec is in Canada, a majority of Quebecers do not identify with the national identity of Canada. Both societies create a sense of identity as well as nationalism (Hiller, 295). Hiller mentions two approaches to assessing Canadian identity; the unitary approach and the segmentalist approach (Hiller, 277). The unitary approach suggests that society consists of people who regardless of their ethnic back ground, identify as belonging to the national society, while the segmentalist approach concentrates on groups and communities that share racial, linguistic, occupational, or cultural similarities (Hiller, 28). While most Anglophones are more unitary or pan-Canadian, Quebec heavily identifies with the segmentalist approach. This dissimilarity of identity perspective may be problematic for the country, at the same time however, it can also be viewed as a struggle where contradictory parties find a way to compromise and reshape Canadian society together (Hiller, 277). Canada’s former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau made it his objective to unite Quebec with the rest of Canada. In 1969 Trudeau’s government implemented Bill C-120, otherwise known as the Official Language act, which made French an...
Any person, place or event that has held the honour of being commemorated in Canada has been recognized of an extreme importance to the country. It is impossible to research commemoration in Canada without reading about world war one and two; The great wars are arguably the most commemorated events in History let alone Canada. Understanding this they are not the only events that receive attention from Canada, the government recognizes many other occurrences as, well, anything from Sir John A. Macdonald day on the 11th of January to the anniversary of the statute of Westminster on the 11th of December. I do not believe that any one event can be placed above or below another, and that they all hold a value in whatever way that may be. This Essay
In fact the place of Sir John A. Macdonald in this country was so large & so absorbing that it is almost impossible to conceive that the politics of this country, will continue without him. His loss overwhelms us. (Swainson, 149)
Newman, Garfield et al. Canada A Nation Unfolding. Toronto: Mc Graw – Hill Ryerson Limited, 2000.
The Confederation act of 1867 without question has had a major influence on the status of contemporary Canada. It has helped shape Canada into one of the worlds most politically and economically powerful countries; a country that is strong, independent, and united. There was a series of events which led to the confederation of Canada, some which are more significant than others. However, I believe that despite the significance of events such as the British encouragement of uniting its North American colonies, the central and key reason for confederation was the fear of potential American (Yankee) inhabitance (whether by persuasion or invasion) of the divided and vast British North American colonies, and the way that the “Fathers of Confederation” were able to take advantage of this situation and persuade reluctant colonies to join Confederation. A strong and united nation could not be easily invaded or bought. These essential factors will be discussed in the paragraphs to come.
Thompson, John Herd, and Mark Paul Richard. "Canadian History in North American Context." In Canadian studies in the new millennium. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008. 37-64.
Our government’s predecessors have attempted to eradicate Canada’s first people, which is not only an insult to the indigenous people of the past, but to the present. This country did not start off as a joint endeavor of the two general groups of people that inhabited it during its birth, but decimation and forced assimilation of great traditions and people. The assimilation of a great culture, the destruction of oral histories, and the forced loss of language destroyed the chance trust. Only by teaching disgust towards that type of attitude and action, by not excusing it or attempting to justify, will begin a new age of
The British North America Act went into effect July 1st, 1867 creating a union known as the Dominion of Canada, but this did not complete the debate on the Confederation issue. Many Nova Scotians continued their opposition to the idea and it would take considerable time before all Nova Scotians would accept the fact of Confederation. “These Nova Scotians, disgruntled at their treatment by Great Britain, found that their loyalty had markedly diminished. The more they considered taking over the responsibility for their own affairs from England, however, the greater trust they had to place in Confederation.”25 Confederation struck a balance between the rights of English and French speaking Canadians. Nevertheless, many divisions, conflicts, and debates would occur not only in Quebec but also in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick over this balance. Economic disparities between the Maritimes and the rest of Canada would also create many problems for the years following 1867. As a result, Confederation can be viewed as a beginning and not an end.
The culture of Canada refers to the shared values, attitudes, standards, and beliefs that are a representative of Canada and Canadians. Throughout Canada's history, its culture has been influenced by American culture because of a shared language, proximity, television and migration between the two countries. Over time, Canadian-American relations have helped develop Canada’s identity during the years 1945-1982; thus introducing changing social norms, media and entertainment. In support of this, due to the United States being approximately 9.25 times larger in population and having the dominant cultural and economic influence, it played a vital role in establishing Canada’s identity. With Canada being its neighbour, naturally, the United States would influence their way of life upon Canada.
Macdonald was the first prime minister of Canada, lawyer, businessman, and politician. He had a dream to “create a single Dominion from sea to sea”. His involvement in the negotiations for the CPR caused him to get involved in the Pacific Scandal. The Pacific Scandal was the first major political scandal in Canada after Confederation. It was the taking of election funds by Macdonald in exchange of the contract for building the railway.
In an article in 1946 he refers to Canada as an almost impossible alliance among three nations the Scotch the French and the English. “As different from one another as these groups may be by nature, they share a common psychological inheritance.” In the second part of the paper first his biography will be introduced to provide the necessary background. This section will be a more or less chronological order of his life. In addition to this his relationship with his father and other social circumstances that formed his identity will be introduced.