Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alcatraz research paper
Occupation of Alcatraz
Alcatraz prison research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Alcatraz research paper
Due to the lack of evidence claiming they died and the overwhelming evidence that there is to back up that they are alive. I believe that the Anglin brothers successfully made it out of Alcatraz alive.
I believe that the Anglin brothers made it off Alcatraz island and they used the tides to get away. In Paragraph nine of Article 1 it states that “they used historical tide data to prove it was possible at the right time to make it to the Golden State Bridge. I can claim this information is true because they also said that. “As a scientist, I don't care what happened; I just want to show that we can do this” Hut said in the last paragraph of Article 1. This means he has zero bias whether they lived or not.
There is more evidence that they lived. In the video, the two nephews of the Anglin brothers claimed they had a picture of the boys down in Brazil. It was claimed that it was taken after the escape. They U.S Marshal services had a professional face identifier take a lot at the photo to prove if it was indeed the brothers. When he was done he said it was in fact John and Clarence Anglin. They also proved by carbon dating that it was taken after the escape. They said it was most likely taken in the 1970’s.
…show more content…
About nine months after the escape human bones washed up on the shores of San Francisco and the government claimed it was the lost Anglin brothers.
With the family's permission they dug up the other brother of the Anglins and took DNA samples from his bones. They sent the samples to a lab to be tested to see if there were the bones of John or Clanrce. A couple of months later the US marshal service came back to the nephew's house with good news to them. The bones came up negative to be related to the Anglin brothers. With that and the pictures that was enough evidence to prove to the government that they need to reopen the case. They did just that after
wards. People might say that there was no real way to tell if the bones were of the boys or if they were a randoms bones. But I say to that, it was proven to be non related to the Anglin Family at all. The US marshal service DNA tested them with the bones of Clarence anglin. There is no way that it can be proven wrong. So due to the lack of evidence that they are dead, and the overwhelming evidence that they are proven to be alive. I can pretty much say for anyone out there that we all believe that the Anglin brothers are alive.
According to the Innocence Project (2006), “On September 17, 2001, Chad wrote the Innocence Project in New York, which, in 2003, enlisted pro bono counsel from Holland & Knight to file a motion for DNA testing on Tina’s fingernail scrapings.” The state had tested the DNA that was under Tina’s nail from the first case but at that time it was inadequate and could not be tested. It was not until now that we have the technology capable enough to test it. In June 2004, the test came back negative to matching both Jeremey and Chain Heins but did come from an unknown male. The state argued that it was not enough to overturn the conviction so Chad’s attorney asked the state to do some further testing and to compare the DNA from under the fingernails to the hairs that was found on Tina’s body. It was in 2005 that the Florida Department of Law Enforcement confirmed that there was a match between the DNA under Tina’s nail and the pubic hair. According to LaForgia (2006), “this particular type of DNA, the report stated, was found in only about 8 percent of Caucasian American men.” During this process there was a new piece of evidence that Chad’s attorney had learned about during the appeals process, a fingerprint. There were some accusations that the prosecutors never disclosed this information about this third fingerprint and if they did it was too late. The jurors did not even know about this fingerprint and if they did this could have changed the whole case. This fingerprint was found on several objects that included the smoke detector, a piece of glass, and the bathroom sink. It was soon discovered that this fingerprint matched with the DNA found on the bedsheets that Tina was on. This was finally enough evidence to help Chad Heins become exonerated in
One anthropologist stated that the evidence supported the theory that the skeletal remains belonged to potential victim #1. Therefore, the prosecution argued that the skeletal remains were that of Robert Rutherford, who went missing four years ago. It is known that the victim and the defendant had some misunderstandings about the hunting area and fought to hunt certain places in the area. On the other hand, another anthropologist stated the opposite and the defense argued that the skeletal remains did not belong to Robert Rutherford, but instead were that of Stephen Morton, who hunted in the area and went missing two years prior to Robert Rutherford. Stephen Morton had no known connections to the defendant, therefore concluding him innocent in the defense’s mind. There are some various similarities found in the case that could point in either the defense or prosecution, therefore the case needs to be revaluated for a third opinion.
The suspect had a chip tooth and Antonio had A gap that was really the only reason he got convicted. There three other suspects didn’t even get close to how Antonio Beaver had allot of similarity’s like the victim that did that crime. The best way to know if the suspect did the crime is doing allot of deep research instead of just going off a shecht artist.
...lice or lawyers used their integrity. The police skirted around the law and use evidence that the witnesses said was not correct. They had a description of the suspect that did not match Bloodsworth but, they went after him as well. They also used eyewitness testimony that could have been contaminated.
I think the detectives did a sloppy job in collecting evidence for the murder. Mark Fuhrman saw a finger print on the gate of Nichols home. and it wasn't found by the collectors who were collecting it. the evidence of the murder. O.k.
Because Simpson was the prime suspect, the judge legally ordered searches on O.J’s house as well as the crime scene. The goal was to find proof that he did commit the crime, by finding DNA or items. Shortly after the searches and tests began, evidence was found. DNA from the crime scene matched the DNA of O.J. Although proof was found, Simpson continued to plead not guilty. Surprisingly enough, O.J st...
Before the trial a man around the same age of Donald tried to beat Donald up, it later name out that John Wayne Gacy hired the teenager to hurt Donald so he woul not have a chance to testify on the stand. John was found guilty and was forced to serve ten year in Iowa State Reformatory, but was released from jail on June 18, 1970 or being a good prisoner. After prison he moved to Chicago, Illinois and started a contracting company, called PMD, which he used to lure young boys into his house. The first murder committed by John, however, was not in association with PMD. John claims the murder that happened on January 2, 1972 was an accident. Timothy McCoy, a fifteen year old boy, was picked up by John at a Greyhound bus terminal. Here is how the murder happened: McCoy entered Gacy’s bedroom with a knife from the kitchen and Gacy thought the boy was going to attack to Gacy struck first out of self defence and sadly stabbed him to death. When he walked into the kitchen he saw Timothy made breakfast and was calling because of food, not to attack. John then stuffed the murdered body into a crawl space underneath the house. In January 1974 John killed an unidentified boy by strangling him and stuffing cloth into vicum’s mouths so no fluids would leak out. This way of murder led to the way John would kill his other
When word got out on this case, celebrities backed up the belief that the three boys were innocent and were being given an unfair trial. In the town, of West Memphis, Arkansas, three eight year old boys (Chris Byers, Michael Moore, and Stevie Branch) went missing May fourth, the following day they were found bruised, mutilated, hogtied, and stripped of their clothes with signs of rape present due to the dilation of the anus. The body of Byers was found submerged in the creek about 60 yards south of Interstate 55. The other two bodies were located exactly five feet in both directions of Byers body. It was determined that Moore and Branch both died from multiple traumatic injuries to the head, torso, and extremities with drowning; while, Byers died of the multiple traumatic injuries to the head, along with the violent removal of his penis, the scrotal sac, and the testicles.... ...
Police investigators continued to match dental records and other clues to help identify the remaining victims who were found on Gacy’s property. All but nine of the victims were finally identified.
Well known inmates of Alcatraz include gangster Al Capone, George “Machine Gun” Kelly, and Alvin “Creepy Karpis” Karpowicz. Capone spent 4 ½ years in Alcatraz. It was the only place where the guards wouldn’t be bribed and the only place where he couldn’t carry out his business in the gang. Capone once said, “It looks like Alcatr...
Rodney Alcala has been linked to other victims that had been killed. Most of the pictures found in his storage have not been identified. Those photos can be possibly of other victims that Alcala may have killed. There was about 100 different photos of young women and also children in the storage. It is strange and creepy that Alcala had many pictures of people that may have been his victims. It makes you think if he really killed these persons.
Although DNA and evidence showed that DeSalvo was the killer, the family of DeSalvo and a nephew Mary Sullivan continue to believe in Albert DeSalvo’s innocence of the 13 murders to which he confessed; they remain convinced that the killer is still
...ta Bank, the disappeared, and the relatives of the disappeared are still being found and identified presently.
Unfortunately, after publishing, experts began to question the forensic methods applied to test the DNA samples, and eventually they were disproved. The Ripper’s identity was unknown once more.