The article that I read was about US District Judge Andrew S. Hanen. He had stopped plans to protect around four million undocumented immigrants from deportation and giving work permit; he copied a promise made by Justice Department attorneys that “nothing would happen” before his order. Hanen was furious to find out that even after releasing this information, government officials gave out 100,00 permits. He was so angry he ordered some attorneys off the case. A Justice Department lawyer said attorneys gave information because they forget other officials were going to provide permits. James Gilligan had apologized on behalf of the attorneys, basically saying they were sorry for their mistake and the time it is taking up. The point of Trump,
II. Trial Court Ruling. The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s sexual harassment claim. The plaintiff’s retaliation claim went to trial, but the court excluded evidence regarding the alleged sexual harassment. The court refused to grant the plaintiff a new trial. The appellate court affirmed the district court’s ruling.
Geraldo Rivera and Bill O’Reilly have a heated argument over immigration in this video clip when Bill O’Reilly brings up an incident when an illegal immigrant was involved in a drunk driving crash that killed another motorist in Virginia Beach. Geraldo Rivera asserts the only reason the incident is being so closely in the media is because the driver was an illegal alien and if it was a “Bubba” or “Bob” Americans would not have heard about the incident. O’Reilly then cites the illegal alien driver had been arrested two previous times and should have been deported the first time he had contact with the police and this drunk driving fatality would never have occurred. Rivera argues that this incident has nothing to do with illegal immigration and what nationality you are has nothing to do with the fact you are driving while intoxicated. Both Rivera and O’Reilly begin getting angrier and talking over one another not allowing the other to respond to one another’s accusations.
The scholarly article I chose was of great interest to me for several reasons. The case is an educational malpractice case in which a student-athlete said he was provided false information by his high school consolor and lost his basketball scholarship as a result. I was a student athlete in high school and sports are still a big part of my life. On top of that I am considering teaching and coaching after I graduate, making this a very relevant topic to me. In the next several paragraphs I am going to summarize the article and cases that it mentions, then I will try and decide what the authors intent was with writing this piece.
...deral judiciary by assuming that his interpretation of the Constitution is unequivocally true. Admittedly, he does a remarkable job at supporting his case, but again he assumes that everyone is of the same mindset.
In the article from Time Magazine, titled, “How Neil Gorsuch is shaking up the supreme court,” written by Tessa Bernson, it discusses how Neil Gorsuch is changing the traditional behaviors of new justice. One way he does this is by doing more than the experienced justices is did. For example, as Tessa Bernson wrote in her article, “Gorsuch a conservative nominated by President Trump, who was confirmed in April, waited just 10 minutes before asking his opening question at his first oral argument. Ver the next hour he fired off 21 more, posing more queries during his debut than any of his eight colleagues did at theirs.” This shows that the traditional new judges were quiet, bu Gorsuch acts like he’s been there for years because he doesn’t let
The Supreme Court's ruling in Grutter v. Bollinger and in Gratz v. Bollinger are two compelling and complex cases. In the Grutter v. Bollinger case, the Supreme court favored that race and ethnicity along with other factors are justifiable in the admission process of promoting a diverse and inclusive student body on the premises of state law schools. I agree with the court's decision because minorities only make up a small percentage on college campuses and universities, and that race and ethnicity does play a crucial role in recruiting students of colors from various cultural backgrounds. Students must be trained scholars who know how to interact with people from all walks of life and they must be able to adapt and understand different people in different environments in a given context. The goal is for everyone
“We think our law is just imbalanced,” de Blasio responded when asked about the collusion between the NYPD and ICE over an immigrant’s upcoming court appearance. “From what I heard, this doesn't tell us anything new or indicate any consistency. But in these two incidents, the individuals in question qualified under our law. And if we had clarify that these warrants were appropriate to turn them over, that is what our law says to do. If they weren't appropriate warrants, we didn't turn them over.”
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) generally requires a federal agency or branch to provide public notice and an opportunity for comment on any proposed rule and the president did not do this. Moreover, Nat’l Park Hospitality Ass’n v. Dep’t of Interior states that an agency action must be tentative to count as a general statement of policy. DAPA is not tentative at all. It was immediately implemented and states began granting Expanded-DACA permits to over 100,000 aliens in under three months. This has put a definite strain on the nation’s resources, especially finance-wise. So, putting in a nationwide injunction on these executive orders will help slow down the naturalization process and help the states adjust their finances
Do you think President Obama abused his executive powers by creating DACA with an Executive Order?
...nned Latinos because they readily fit the social caricature of what Latinos are supposed to look like. In Brignoni-Ponce and Martinez-Fuerte the Court performed a balancing test where it determined that the intrusion to an individual’s rights in an immigration stop was minor compared to the pressing governmental interest of border enforcement. However, the Court ignored the stigmatizing effect of the ruling on Latinos. The media bombards the culture at large with depictions of Latinos as undocumented immigrants. Brignoni-Ponce reinforces these depictions by making Latinos presumptively guilty of being in the country illegally. Citizens are subjected to undue scrutiny because the court is reinforcing the negative cultural association between Latino identity and criminality. It is unjust to impose these undue burdens on a population that is vastly law abiding.
By doing this, Trump does make a good point that in order to protect our country, the people who enter this country must be checked before entering. Trump said that, “"I am establishing new vetting measures to keep radical Islamic terrorists out of the United States of America," (Merica). Trump also said during the signing at the Pentagon after the swearing-in of Defense Secretary James Mattis. ‘We don't want them here’” (Merica). Trump’s purpose of his plan is to eliminate radicals from entering the country, but in order to do that all people that live or come from that area must be prevented as
In viewing the vedio two difining events come to mind Immigratiom Act of 1990 and The American Civil War. The Immigration Act of the 1990was an amendement incacted by George W. Bush but first introduced by Ted Kenndy in 1989 . The Immigratiion Act of 1990 is to increase the number of legal immigrants into the Unites States it also brought in the lottery system which randomly assigns visa to immigrants but it also prohibited visa's from being given to certian counties and homosexuality, like Prisdent Trumps is doing now with the Musilims. and The American Civil War in the 19th century. Trump's bias against Mexican American and other nationalities. He spreads propagrando aganist Mexicans cliaming they are the cause of the crime rate going
Trump's executive orders are similar to the Alien and Sedition Acts. The Alien and Sedition acts were passed during John Adam's presidency in order to prepare for war with France. What the acts did was increase the time required for a person to have stayed in the U.S to obtain citizenship from 5 years to 14 years. It also required the person to tell their intents in the country 5 years prior to getting citizenship. Additionally, the acts prohibited anybody from publishing anything that was deemed scandalous or malicious towards the government, and that the president count deport anyone deemed unsafe to the country. These acts were aimed at making it harder for immigrants to obtain U.S citizenship, much like President Trump is doing with his
In this article by Madison Park and Kyung La about the riots at the University of California, Berkeley, it goes into detail about the context of these riots. The perpetrators were a group of anarchists that are known in that area of California. In the article, it was said that these people “were not affiliated with the university” (“Berkeley Protests”). These protests caused lots of damage at the university, and it is having devastating consequences. The administration at UC Berkeley might have to pay off $100,000 in repairs. As well, Donald Trump is not feeling well about the situation and is threatening to punish the university because of the fact that this is a violation of free speech. He tweeted after the event occurred that he was
But with no documentation or anything, we won't know the difference between the good and the bad. But trump also wanted to block entry all in all from many different countries to protect the people who had already lived here in the United States as he had said in the article “DHS chief promises to carry out Trumps immigration order