Andrew Carnegie's The Gospel Of Wealth

854 Words2 Pages

Andrew Carnegie suggested that all wealthy men should not just leave their money behind to their relatives and children, but instead invest it into their communities and help push the growth of their communities. Carnegie once stated “The laborer now has more comfort than the farmer had a few generations ago. The farmer has more luxuries than the landlord has and is more richly clad and better housed. The landlord has books and pictures rarer, and appointments more artistic, than the King could then obtain.” (Gospel of Wealth) This statement helps push forward his views of helping the community you are a part of instead of solely yourselves for the betterment of people altogether. What Carnegie believes in is very honorable and the only thing you can do is respect him for his decision to do so. With the money he donated, he opened many schools, non-profit organizations, charities, and libraries, like the ones he used to go to when he arrived in …show more content…

I can see the viewpoint that he leaves out the middle class and the working class that are directly affected by him and he does not seem remorseful or apologetic for the working conditions and the environment that he has these people working in. His focus in writing the Gospel of Wealth is to try and reach out to the wealthy and explain why their money should be spent in a way to help the poorer class, but he ignores the middle working class that hold up his company. This can be seen when he says, “The man of wealth, thus becoming the newest trustee and agent for his poorer brethren, is bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience and ability to administer.” (Prince of

Open Document