Difference Between Marx And Carnegie

Ethics vs. Morality What are your thoughts on Andrew Carnegie and his way of incorporating the word “Gospel” in his work? Does this automatically make him a person who seems to emphasize morality and ethics? Carnegie believed that industrialization was the beginning of the distinction between the “wealthy” and the “poor” social classes. Robert Reich and Carnegie would most likely agree on the average man having the opportunity to thrive. However, Carl Marx and Carnegie views on property, wealth, and competition were complete opposites. Both writers agreed on issues regarding the common man in the industrial era and its problems. Marx claimed that changing history in the industrial era would bring a new era. On the other hand, Carnegie believed

He immigrated from Scotland and later opened up his own Steel business, which opened up a series of opportunities for him to prosper and become wealthy. Carnegie was aware of the different social classes, but was certain that it was not a threat to the people of the American society. He exclaims, “ …But good, has come to the race from the accumulation of wealth by those who have the ability and energy that produce it” (Jacobus 488). As a person who is biased on the wealthy community, he placed little regard for the issues that the “common man” had to endure. For instance, he claims, “ Of every thousand dollars spent in so-called charity to-day, it is probable that $950 is unwisely spent; so spent, indeed, as to produce the very evils which it proposes to mitigate or cure.” (Jacobus 494). This quote is demonstrating that the poor social class spends their money unwisely, and that is the reason why they are un-wealthy. As implied that the wealthy gives money to charity, Carnegie brings up the question that charity is unreasonable. Charity is unreasonable due to the idea that the poor spends their money unwisely and should therefore not be rewarded or helped in any shape or

This particular work outlined the class struggles in the industrial era and how it pertained to the deterioration of the economy. Unlike Carnegie, Marx was concerned with the working-class and their struggles that they had to deal with from day to day. Due to industrialization, Marx believed that it resulted in two different classes: which he identified as the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The proletariat consisted of your typical blue-collar worker, while the bourgeoisie was a person of upper-class such as a doctor, professional, etc. Marx claims, “ Of all the classes that stand face to face with the bourgeoisie today the proletariat alone is a really revolutionary class…is its special and essential product.” (Jacobus 465). Marx clearly revolutionizes Carnegie’s perception that the common man had no way of becoming wealthy. Instead, he emphasizes that the proletariat class plays an important factor in the improvement of the economy. Marx believed that eliminating private property would end competition. Ending competition among all classes would help repair the struggles of the working class. If competition was disregarded then all classes can work together to help improve each others social class or stature in society. Marx favored a democratic society where all community members could come together and have equal access to different opportunities. According to Marx, “When...capital is