In October 16, 1936, one of the most notorious heinous serial killers was born. This killer brutally murdered over fifty-two helpless victims and ruined lives with no remorse. This horrible murderer was Andrei Chikatilo. The purpose of this paper is to analyze Chikatilo and determine, to our best knowledge, why and what pushed him to commit these acts. An examination of his early life, the history of Chikatilo himself, his murder victims, and a general theory and famous criminologist that could possibly explain this behavior will be analyzed. It will be broken apart into four different segments: History of Andrei Chikatilo, Murder Spree, The Final Discovery, The Theory of These Actions, and Concluding Evidence. Andrei Chikatilo, born on October …show more content…
16, 1936, grew up in the town of Yablochnoye, Ukraine. During this time, the Ukraine state was under the USSR and this affected his family personally. In the time of the 1930s, the “Breadbasket” of the USSR was located in Ukraine. This meant individual farms and labor induced would be forced into collective farms. These were mainly “kolkhozy” and “sovkhozy” meaning they were now state-own farms (The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica, 1998). These drastic changes began a harsh famine that annihilated a majority of the population. When most believed that the situation could not get worse, the USSR went into World War II which resulted in multiple bombing raids on Ukraine. This affected Chikatilo’s home life and social life growing up. Roman Chikatilo, Andrei’s father, served in World War II against Germany.
While this was an honorable deed, if a soldier was captured, they became dishonored due to their coward actions. This affected Chikatilo in his school life. Because of the consequences of his father’s capture, Chikatilo was bullied throughout his schooling time due to his father being a “cowardice.” (Banco, n.d.) In addition to bullying about his father, Andrei also suffered from hydrocephalus, water on the brain, at birth. This caused genital-urinary tract problems. These caused issues such as bed-wetting in the later adolescent period of his life and also the issue of being able to ejaculate but not sustain an erection. Due to these issues, Andrei refrained from sexual interaction in fear of ridicule. His only known sexual experience during his adolescence was when he overpowered a young girl. However, during the struggle, he ejaculated immediately and was humiliated. This interaction created the stimulation between sexual interaction and …show more content…
violence. Andrei Chikatilo, not only had struggles in social environments, had some setbacks in his school success. In the 1960s, Chikatilo applied to Moscow State University. After failing his entrance exam, he moved to the town of Rodionovo-Nesvetayevsky, a town near Rostov. His first job was as a telephone engineer. This was the first of many jobs. He soon moved onto being a school teacher, however, after many complaints at different schools of “indecent assaults on young children (Robinson, 2016),” Chickatilo finally ended in a mining school in a town near Rostov. Tatyana Chickatilo, Andrei’s younger sister, was concerned with his success with relationships and decided to take the matter into her own hands. Setting him up with Fayina Odnacheva, Andrei grew an attachment and married her in 1963. They ended up having two children, Yuri and Lyudmila, even with his genital problems with sustaining an erection. They ended up having a family that seemed to be “normal.” Seven years later, Chikatilo took his first victim. In total, Andrei Chikatilo is the offender to 53 known murders, ranging in victims from age nine to forty-four. The first victim, Lena Zokotnova, was a nine year old girl who was lured by Chikatilo into a second house he owned. Soon, she had been raped, strangled, and stabbed three times before being thrown into a nearby frozen over stream. Following this murder, after the body was found, Chikatilo was taken into custody as a suspect (Goss, Gray, & Villalvazo, n.d.). A bystander had seen Chikatilo with the victim before their disappearance, however, another man was charged and convicted for the crime after a pushed confession. Chikatilo was released from police custody after his wife provided him with a strong alibi. Alexsandr Kravchenko, convicted of this murder, was executed in 1984 after his trial. For the next three years, no victims were documented causing the uproar of the murder to settle. In 1981, Chikatilo killed again. Throughout the next eight years, the rest of his victims were murdered. Andrei sought out prostitutes, young women, those who were mentally-ill, teenagers, and alcoholics, promising them a return of alcoholic beverages (Blanco, n.d.). With most, except for the few who were strangled, Chikatilo preferred the method of stabbing for his victims. With some, he would attempt or successfully rape the victims. Usually, the lifeless bodies would be thrown into the woods or rivers in the nearby area. As Chikatilo began murdering more and more, he began cutting off parts of the victims’ bodies, such as sexual organs and the tips of tongues. He would chew on these parts of flesh and then spit them out (Goss, Gray, & Villzlvazo, n.d.). Unlike a usual cannibal, Chikatilo would not swallow the flesh. One distinguishing factor about Chikatilo’s actions was, with certain victims, he would gouge out their eyes or blindfold them. His reasoning behind this was because he believed that eyes of victims would leave an imprint of those who killed them. Also, he did not want to look at certain victims in the eyes while killing them.After multiple times of being arrested for suspicious activity and released due to no convicting evidence, Andrei Chikatilo was arrested for the final time. Police had placed him under surveillance after being told by many of his previous colleagues about his past complaints of sexual assault against students. After six days of surveillance, he was arrested following police watching him wander around the town making contact with children along the way. Once arrested, a strip search was performed revealing a finger with a severe flesh wound. It was concluded by medical examiners that the only way to explain the wound was a human bite. Also, Chikatilo was in possession of a folding knife. During questioning the following day, he refused to admit to any murders repeatedly. There seemed to be no progress until Dr. Aleksandr Bukhanovsky was invited to question Chikatilo. By using the approach of convincing Andrei that he was mentally ill and needed help, within two hours, he had confessed to thirty-six murders that were originally linked to him. However, he denied two more murdered that were believed to be linked to him by police. Soon, he admitted to twenty additional murders that had not been discovered yet. It was soon found out that Alexsandr Kravchenko, the man convicted and executed for Chikatilo’s first victim, was innocent. Just before the trial, a six-day psychiatric evaluation was done and concluded that Chikatilo was legally sane and could be tried for the crimes.
Throughout the trial, Chikatilo was placed in an iron cage, which was kept in the corner of the courtroom, for protection from the families of the victims. Many had no idea what had happened to their relatives until it was gruesomely described. Chikatilo, throughout the entire trial, interrupted by exposing himself, refusing to answer any questions asked by the court, or singing over those talking. He had to be removed from the courtroom multiple times. On the last day of the trial, one of the victim’s brothers would not handle the pain anymore and threw a large, heavy chunk of metal at Chikatilo. After this hit him in the chest, security attempted to arrest the man but the families of the survivors blocked them so he would not be prosecuted (Robinson, 2016) On October 15, Andrei Chikatilo was finally sentenced to 52 counts of murder. This was one less than the 53 he was tried for. Each count was given the death penalty. When given the chance at a final speech before the verdict, Chikatilo refused. The judge, Leonid Akhobzyanov, once the verdict was announced stated: “Taking into consideration the monstrous crimes he committed, this court has no alternative but to impose the only sentence that he deserves. I therefore sentence him to death” (Blanco, n.d.). Three months later, Andrei Chikatilo was executed by a single gunshot to the
head. The purpose of this paper was to outline Andrei Chikatilo’s life, sort through the many murder victims he left behind, analyze what factors had to do with his lifestyle, and explain what theorists would believe was the explanation of his criminal behavior. Throughout his life, Andrei Chikatilo committed over fifty murders and was finally, in the end, sentenced to fifty-two counts of murder resulting in the death penalty. While he was diagnosed as mentally sane just before his trial, many would think he was far from sane (Robinson, 2016). Theorists would use psychological and biological factors to explain his crimes but many would simply consider Chikatilo an insane serial killer.
On the the 15th of November 2012, Dragi Maglovski was convicted guilty of the murder of his wife, Rosa Maglovska. This conviction was made after a 7-day hearing in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. Mrs. Maglovska’s murder was the result of 10 stab wounds and 37 slash wounds, all inflicted by Mr. Maglovski. The wounds were inflicted with a knife taken from the couple’s kitchen.
Criminology is often referred as the study of crime and its offenders. yet many argued about the definition of crime itself. There are various definitions of crime available, such as the legalistic definition where crime is defined as the act of conviction of criminal law (by Paul Tappan), or the statistical definition where an action is considered a crime if the frequency of it conducted is low (by L.T. Wilkins) (Muncie J 1996), leaving the fact that crime itself is not definite. The definition of crime might changes overtime due to the alteration of culture, moral conduct, values, beliefs, etc. For instance, the act of sodomy was considered a crime once, yet today even gay marriages has been legalised. On the contrary, regardless to the changes of the definition, murder has always been considered as an delinquent behaviour and a serious crime. The punishment would usually be equally burdensome, varying in death sentence (such as hanging, beheading and lethal injection) to what is more common at this modern era, a long-time to life-time imprisonment. This essay will discuss a murder crime occurred in Adelaide and will explain the crime causation along with the relevant theory.
In the essay titled The Execution of Tropmann by Ivan Turgenev, he offers an eye witness account of the execution of young gentlemen named Tropmann. Throughout Turgenev’s essay, his focus to his readers is to primarily deliver his perspective as an un-involved onlooker of Tropmann’s execution. As Turgenev’s speaks, he sets a tone of anxiety and anticipation surrounding this ordeal and during this publically hyped execution he turns his attention towards whether or not capital punishment is morally just.
David Berkowitz, otherwise known as the “Son of Sam”, was notorious for his crimes committed between 1976 and 1977 that ended the lives of six innocent victims and wounded several others in New York (“David Berkowitz Biography”, n.d.). At first, police did not make a connection between the murders because there was nothing unusual about them; all the victims were shot with a 40 caliber gun, not fairly unusual during this time or place especially since the killings were over an extended period of time. Police finally made the connection when Berkowitz began to live behind notes that were meant to tantalize authorities since they had yet to catch him (“David Berkowitz| Son of Sam Killer,” 2015). Often times, the psychological structure of a human
Introduction: On the spectrum of criminal activity, serial killers are rather rare. Rarer still is a serial killer like Ted Bundy. Bundy confessed to killing 28 women in the 1970s in ghastly fashion and some believe he may have killed far more. It is hard to imagine what could cause any person to cross the mental boundary into such macabre behavior as Bundy perpetrated. Nevertheless, it is important to try to understand that behavior because only though such an understanding would society be able to identify and deter mass murderers in order to save lives.
There are many theories that can be applied to different cases that have occurs in Americas history. The two theories that are choses for this paper are the trait theory and under the trait theory is psychological which is “abnormal personality and psychological traits are the key to determinant of anti-social behavior. There is a link between mental illness, personality disorders and crime (Siegel, 2014). The second theory is the Choice theory which “criminals weigh the cost and benefits and make a conscious, rational choice to commit crime” (Siegel, 2014). This paper will show how a theory can be applied to a person and a crime. Some of the cases that are being presented some will not agree but up us all about the person perspective.
Upon execution of his criminal acts, Bundy often visited the secondary scene of crime where he performed sexual acts with the decomposing bodies of the victims until destruction by wild animals or decomposition made further interaction with the bodies impossible. In addition to these criminal acts, Bundy decapitated heads of some of his victims and kept their heads in his residence for a period of time as mementos (Rule, 2009). The cases involving Bundy and his victims include cases of murder, rape, necrophile and kidnapping. These are capital offences that were well planned and executed by the perpetrator who made subsequent follow-ups of his criminal acts by visiting the secondary scene of crime. Description of the offender’s psychological history and functioning at the time of the offence is based on a statistical approach which involves the analysis of behavioural and other relevant information found at the scene of crime in order to infer the characteristics of the offender and his psychological processes (Woodhams & Toye, 2007)....
As years go on so will the research on serial killers and hopefully we as a society will fully understand them and one day be able to cure whatever inside that makes them have the urge to kill. Works Cited The Electronic Journal of Sociology, published by the University of Guelph, Ontario. http://www.scribd.com/doc/167086215/How-Serial-Killers-Work. According to the article “10 Most Common Traits of Potential Serial Killers By Hestie Barnard Gerber. According to Comrade Chikatilo: The Psychopathology of Russia's Notorious Serial Killer.
Andrei Chikatilo was a serial killer in the late 70s to 1990 who brutally murdered and sexually assaulted between 52-56 people. There are three categories of theory he falls under. The categories are psychological, sociological, and psychological. His upbringing and his life as a child shaped all of these categories he falls under.
Serial killers have captivated the attention of scientists from the first signs of their existence to modern day. Interested by these killers’ inhumane actions, researchers set out to determine the cause of such graphic, horrific crimes. The brain has been brought into question regarding the motivation of these cold blooded killers. After extensive research, abnormalities of both the chemical composition and material makeup have been identified within the brains of numerous serial killers. These differences are more than mere coincidence, they are evidence that killers do not think in the same way. The killers’ drives and motives are irregular, just as their brains are. Not only are these variations interesting, but they are also crucial to the justice system in regards to the punishment of past, future, and present sequential murderers. It is important that as a society we learn the differences in the mind of a killer, and also recognize and understand them. A serial killer’s brain greatly differs in function from the average citizen’s brain due to physical variations in the brain and a different chemical makeup.
Andrei Romanovich Chikatilo seemed to be just like a regular man. He had a wife, two kids, was a teacher in Russian literature, an engineer, and a proud soviet party member. No one would have ever guessed he was one of the world’s most notorious serial killers. By day, he was your average Joe literature teacher, but by night he took upon a darker passion that involved rape and murder. He would lure his victims into decollate locations with sadistic intent unknown to them. Chikatilo managed see out his sick secrets for over a decade with little suspicion. His evil desires stemmed from his childhood.
Holden, C. (1999). Stalking a killer in russia's prisons. Science, 286(5445), 1670. Retrieved from http://0-search.proquest.com.ignacio.usfca.edu/docview/213581880?accountid=14674
This paper will analyze the factors that create a serial killer. Beginning with the definition of a serial killer, the reader should expect
From the very first word of this extraordinary piece of literature, the thoughts and transgressions of Raskolnikov penetrates the heart and mind of the reader with exceptional insight, skillfully constructed suspense plots and a dynamic, autonomous hero. It is true to state that 'Crime and Punishment' had a profound influence on the modern intellectual climate, sparking off a wave of existentialist writings, and it is not difficult to discover why. The intricate and enthralling exploration, carried out by Raskolnikov, of conflicting internal drives, personal motivations and philosophical justification of one's existence leads to the impulsive testing of his rights to transgress moral law.
After his name came up linked to a crime in 1984, he was placed on surveillance. On November 20th he was arrested, but refused to confess to authorities about the killings when he was caught. It wasn’t until the police decided to set him up with a psychiatrist, where he finally opened up about (and described) the 56 murders he committed. The information was used to prove where some of the bodies were located. Andrei confessed to 56 murders. Andrei Chikatilo was found guilty of 52 counts of murder, and sentenced to death for each of the murders (Blanco, Murderpedia). This is equivalent to 52 death sentences. Evidence used in the trial included a grey hair found on one of the victims, AB blood type found from a semen sample, eyewitness reports of what he looked like around train stations, and most sufficient: a bitemark on Andrei’s finger that matched a 16 year old victim. Another piece of evidence used was knives found in his briefcase when he was taken into custody. Andrei Chikatilo died on February 14th, 1994, by a gunshot to the back of his neck since he was faced with the death