Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Serial killers and their backgrounds
Introduction on serial killers
Introduction on serial killers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Serial killers and their backgrounds
As stated in an article, by Bizarrepedia, entitled, “ The Butcher of Rostov”, Andrei Chikatilo’s last words were, “Don’t blow my brains out! The Japanese want to buy them!” (“Butcher” 3). He was well known because of the crazy and unusual ways that he did his killings. He is one of the most well-known and notorious serial killer in Russia. Throughout his lifetime, he had a very awkward marriage, a short military career, a teaching career, and the rest of his life was full of crime and killings. Andrei Chikatilo was a crazy and insane serial killer.
Andrei Chikatilo was born on October 16th, 1936 (“Andrei” 1). Before he was born, Andrei’s brother, Stephen, was kidnapped and eaten by their family’s neighbors (“Chikatilo” 3). Andrei grew
…show more content…
up soon after the Great Ukrainian Famine of the 1930’s which made many people turn to become cannibals (Jenkins 1). Andrei’s parents were both farmers that lived in a small hut (“Chikatilo” 3). As a teenager, he was a good student, but also a communist (“Chikatilo” 4). Once Chikatilo was ready to get married, he was very rushed. He married a woman named Feodosia Odvacheva, that he met through his sister. He liked her, but had known her for only two weeks before they had been married (“Chikatilo” 6). Also, he served in the military in the army in Russia from 1957 to 1960 (“Chikatilo” 5). His time there was very short and didn’t involve much action. After he left the military, he decided to get his degree. He became a teacher after getting his degree in 1971 from the Rostov Liberal Arts University (Jenkins 1). After becoming a teacher, he started his first offenses and became someone that wasn’t trusted. Andrei Chikatilo had a very large career of killing and violence and it started while he was teaching.
Andrei did not get in trouble for either of his first two offenses as a teacher (“Chikatilo” 7). But, after many complaints of him molesting both males and females, he was finally fired from his job as a teacher (“Chikatilo” 7). After his teaching career ended, he really started to turn towards a criminal career. His first killing and rape was on a nine year old girl named Yelena Zakotnova, in 1978 (“Butcher” 6). First, he would find his victims in public places. Then, he would find some way to get them into a nearby forest. Then he would kill, rape, and maybe even eat parts of them (“Slavic”1). At other times he would jump on his victims, then stab them to death (Schnemann 2). After his first killing, he had committed 31 more murders before he had been arrested for the first time in 1984 (“Ripper” 1). Andrei was released, soon after being arrested because his blood type didn’t match any of the evidence at the crime scenes (“Ripper” 1). However, this first arrest didn’t cause him to slow down or stop. It took six more years and many more killings before Andrei Chikatilo was arrested again in 1990 (“Ripper” 1). He said that killing made him feel “good”. After all of these killings that he committed, he was given the nicknames “The Rostov Ripper” and “The Butcher of Rostov”, because Rostov, Russia was where most of his murders, crimes, and rapes happened …show more content…
(“Chikatilo” 3). After Andrei Chikatilo had been convicted for a second time, the police made sure that he would never get out.
While in custody, Andrei confessed to what he did and even showed the police where and how he killed and raped his victims (Jenkins 2). He had confessed to 56 murders, but only 53 were tried in April, 1992 due to lack of evidence of the other three (Chikatilo 2). Of the 52 cases that he was found guilty for 14 involved girls, 17 were young women or teenagers, and 21 boys, and maybe even more that were never known of (Schnemann 1). In court, Andrei had to be kept in a cage and he wouldn’t act good at all. For most of his court cases he was sent out of the room after five minutes for screaming and hitting his bench against the bars of his cage (Schnemann 1). Chikatilo was given the death penalty. He was executed on February 14th, at age 57 by gunshot (“Chikatilo” 1). Andrei’s life had ended because of all the crazy stuff that he did throughout his
lifetime. Andrei Chikatilo was a crazy and insane serial killer. He had a very crazy background with things such as an abnormal marriage, a brief military career, and a teaching career. Throughout his lifetime he had committed over fifty killings of both males and females in Russia. Lastly, he had to face a lot of court cases for all of the crimes that he committed and murders that he had done. Imagine what it would be like if Andrei Chikatilo was never captured, and still committed these killings today.
Mr. Maglovski pleaded not guilty to the charge of murder, but pleading guilty to manslaughter with the defense of provocation. In the months prior to her death Mrs. Maglovska had been becoming more and more independent, and on the day that she decided to leave Mr. Maglovski she allegedly spat in his face and told him that she didn’t want to live with him anymore. The fight that ensued resulted in Mrs. Maglovska’s death. After his wife’s death a very calm and collected Mr. Maglovski called ‘000’ and then proceeded to show the emergency services officer’s the crime scene. During his trial Mr. Maglovski shared with the courtroom a little about his culture, he explained the understanding within his culture that behavior such as his wife’s would demand a “ritual cleansing of the family of the shame” . Neither this, nor any other mitigating factors, was enough to reduce Dragi Maglovski’s charge to manslaughter, however, and he was charged with the murder of his wife, Mrs. Maglovska.
During Baltovich’s first trial, the testimonies of two witnesses stated that it was Baltovich’s intention to kill his girlfriend “in a jealous rage.”
Both “Full Circle” and “The Most Dangerous Game” have many differences with how the murder is presented in the story, but both also have many similarities. In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” the murder was done for fun and sport, General Zaroff killed his victims to fulfill a hunting sensation. But in the short story “Full Circle”, the murder was done out of jealousy, because the Terry was rejected. Throughout my paper I hope to show the similarities and differences of the murder cases within the two stories.
What would cause an individual to behave in this rather heinous and macabre manner? Using Robert Pickton as a case study, this paper will explore the phenomenon of serial murder and apply research literature to help explain his behaviour and examine issues such as psychopathy, mental disorder, and substance abuse relevant to the Pickton case. In addition, the paper will explore the sexually sadistic nature of Pickton’s murders. Finally, the paper will explore the reasoning behind Pickton’s selection of drug addicted prostitutes as victims that enabled him to conduct his murders in relative anonymity. ...
Kuklinski was rational in the way that he conducted his business, as well as his killings but the motivation for it was based on the psychodynamic theory. Kuklinski was a very rational actor in the sense that he thought about the safest ways to kill people without getting caught or doing a good job dismembering the body or freezing it so it prevents identification. Kuklinski’s favorite “weapon” was cyanide poisoning, which back then, was undetectable in an autopsy. He would poison his victims and the cause of death ended up being unknown. Richard Kuklinski also earned his name “The Iceman” by freezing the bodies after death, to throw off the forensic pathologists when they look for a time of death. This is beneficial because it wouldn't put Kuklinski at the scene of the murder. To prevent detection he would also sometimes bury the individual bodies. This was a very rational choice that reaped individual benefits which is consistent with the rational choice theory. Kuklinski had gotten into that work because this was the only way he knew how to provide for his family. Richard had wanted his family to be taken care of, he didn't want to feel weak and out of control of his home life. He had such a problem with control, that according to his ex-wife, he, just like his father abused her and the children. Although the motivation
Do you know the definition of a serial killer? Maybe you have your own definition, such as: a person that mass murders people in the grocery store. Or: a crazy human being that kills people more than once. According to Dictionary.com, a serial killer is defined as “a person who carries out a series of murders, often with no apparent motive and typically following a characteristic, predictable behavior pattern.” General Zaroff from the story The Most Dangerous Game fits almost exactly into that definition. He makes the worst decisions over all of our short stories because he takes innocent lives with great intention, he takes immense pleasure in doing so, and he does it repeatedly.
In 1934, Sergey Kirov a rival to Stalin was murdered. Stalin is believed to have been behind the assassination, he used it as a pretext to arrest thousands of his other opponents who in his words might have been responsible for Kirov’s murder. These purges not only affected those who openly opposed Stalin but ordinary people too. During the rule of Stain o...
Countless reports possess trials and executions of captives [kulaks] who, at the time, dared not to speak a word of their experience in fear of retaliation among the Soviet militia. Accordingly, Orlando Figes documented memoirs, letters, and many other stories in The Whisperers: Private Life in Stalin's Russia unraveling the reasons for Stalin’s doing. One leader of Komsomol brigade recalled, “Hatred of the ‘kulaks’ were drummed into them [soldiers] by their commanders and by propaganda which portrayed the ‘kulak parasites’ and ‘blood-suckers’ as dangerous ‘enemies of people’. We were trained to see the kulaks, not as human beings, but as vermin, lice, which had to be destroyed.” (Figes Paragraph 2) In the eyes of Stalin and his Soviet army, kulaks were nothing but animals who deserve torture and death. One other reason why soldiers forced the peasants into farmhouses, or kolkhoz exclaimed by the activist, “Without the kolkhoz, the kulaks would have grabbed us by the throat and skinned us all alive!” (Figes Paragraph 2) Stalin’s determination and pride in holding control of the Soviet Union and spreading Communism ended with a stroke.
Crime and Punishment takes us in the puzzle centered on Raskolnikov, a young man in old Russia who commits murder and then after a lot of lies and deceit finally pays for his wrongdoings.
A serial killer is traditionally defined as the separate killings of three or more people by an individual over a certain period of time, usually with breaks between the murders. (Angela Pilson, p. 2, 2011) This definition has been accepted by both the police and academics and therefore provides a useful frame of reference (Kevin Haggerty, p.1, 2009). The paper will seek to provide the readers with an explanation of how serial killers came to be and how they are portrayed in the media. Several serial killers have a definitive and common personality profile.
Serial killing, although not in the same form, has been around since the beginning of time. Unlike today, in ancient times many killed for power, revenge, or a blood lust. For example, during the middle ages, Gilles de Raid, the original “Bluebeard,” and Elizabeth Bathory, the “Blood Countess,” were believed to be werewolves for their heinous acts upon countless victims. Today, it is more commonly used to satisfy a blood lust or to gain control over another person. Vlad the Impaler, a ruthless ruler known as Dracula, killed...
As years go on so will the research on serial killers and hopefully we as a society will fully understand them and one day be able to cure whatever inside that makes them have the urge to kill. Works Cited The Electronic Journal of Sociology, published by the University of Guelph, Ontario. http://www.scribd.com/doc/167086215/How-Serial-Killers-Work. According to the article “10 Most Common Traits of Potential Serial Killers By Hestie Barnard Gerber. According to Comrade Chikatilo: The Psychopathology of Russia's Notorious Serial Killer.
Mass Murderers and Serial Killers are nothing new to today’s society. These vicious killers are all violent, brutal monsters and have an abnormal urge to kill. What gives people these urges to kill? What motivates them to keep killing? Do these killers get satisfaction from killing? Is there a difference between mass murderers and serial killers or are they the same. How do they choose their victims and what are some of their characteristics? These questions and many more are reasons why I was eager to write my paper on mass murderers and serial killers. However, the most interesting and sought after questions are the ones that have always been controversial. One example is; what goes on inside the mind of a killer? In this paper I will try to develop a better understanding of these driven killers and their motives.
This paper will analyze the factors that create a serial killer. Beginning with the definition of a serial killer, the reader should expect
The majority of Raskolnikov’s theory seems logical until the reader arrives at its single essential flaw. Raskolnikov’s idea that “the enactment of a crime is invariably accompanied by illness”(311) was one aspect of the theory which, through its accuracy in Raskolnikov’s crime, seemed to lend validity to the entirety of the theory; several brief experiences with “faintness” on the character Raskolnikov’s behalf, insinuate the veracity of his ideas.