Andrea Yates Case Study

1162 Words3 Pages

The Andrea Yate’s case impacted America greatly. She was known as an average catholic mother who was born in Houston, Texas. She had an education, pursued a nursing degree. And was normally developed and respected by her family throughout her life (Murderpedia). After reading about this case study I found it to be very interesting but also very insane... Andrea Yates’ was a mom of five children and randomly decided one day to drown all of them because she believed that would save them from “burning in hell”. After the occurrence of this traumatic event, she was sent to psychiatric prison for life but was eventually released if received excellent mental health care. Many people were shocked that they released her from prison because this woman …show more content…

Andrea Yates was smart, I know for a fact that she knew what she was doing… but maybe at this time she just did not have any control over the actions that she was performing. Before the murder, Yates waited for her husband Russel to leave for work “because she knew he would have prevented her from harming the killing” (Murderpedia). Before the murder, Yates also locked up the family dog whom usually romes free to prevent “interfering with her killing the children one by one” (Murderpedia). After the murder occurred, she called the police to turn herself in. When Officer David Knapp arrived, she stood at the door and repeated, “I killed my kids” twice. She then led Knapps to the master bedroom where “the bodies of Luke, 3, Paul, 2, John, 5, and Mary, 6 months, were laid out on the bed like lumps” (CNN). Insanely did not have an impact on her actions. Being insane is when a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality; uncontrollable behavior – and that was not the case with her (Psychology Today). Yates knew exactly what she was doing at the time of doing so. Yates was well developed and well aware of her actions, but she knew that if she gave her children the opportunity to survive, than it would be hurt fault if they “burned in hell”… so in order to end things quickly she had to end their current lives to protect them from their future …show more content…

Yates was a very catholic women and religion had a huge influence in her life – hence, the names of her all her children. “She believed [that] she was being possessed [by]… Satan [and] (666) was marked on her scalp”. Yates said, “My children weren’t righteous. They stumbled because I was evil, they were doomed to perish in the fires of hell”. She also stated to Officer Knapps that her children “weren’t developing correctly” and “that drowning them was the only way to save them” (PACKET). On the other hand, “Where was her extended family when she needed help so desperately?”…Yates did not even have a social support (not even from her husband) and was suffering “individualism”. (PACKET). Furthermore, Yates was not able to live up to her religious values or American norms. The fact that she had no support and that her kids were not developing correctly, the best thing she could have done was to drown

Open Document