Anderman's Argumentative Analysis

854 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Gender equality

The battle for equal marriage and parenting rights for homosexual couples has been a contentious one largely due to the concerns of dissidents questioning the naturality of sexual relations between members of the same sex. One of the prevailing arguments cited for opposing same sex relationships is the notion that homosexual sex is unnatural and thus immoral because procreation is not a possible result of homosexual sex. Ryan Anderman, spokesman for the Family Policy Institute, argues that “the state must strive to limit” same sex relationships due to their abnormality and lack of morals. However, while Anderman makes several claims in an effort to delegitimize sex between same sex couples, he fails to realize both that his criteria for the morality of a sexual act would include groups of heterosexual people who cannot reproduce, yet partake in sex for reasons beyond procreation, as well as that making homosexual sex illegal on the grounds that it is non-procreative …show more content…

It is assumed that sex was designed by nature exclusively for the purpose of procreation: partaking in sex for anything outside of its “natural intent” is deemed immoral. However, although heterosexual couples frequently engage in sexual activity for reasons other than procreation, one can assume that Anderman amends his argument by pointing out that procreation is a possibility of heterosexual sex, whereas it is impossible in homosexual sex. He continues to assert that not only is any act that cannot produce offspring immoral, but that the state has an interest in preventing these acts from occurring. Consequently, this definition of morality opens a variety of questions concerning non-homosexual groups that fall under the umbrella of sex acts that hold no possibility of

Show More
Related

  • Galen Strawson's Argumentative Analysis

    1544 Words  | 4 Pages

    It is a prevailing assumption among both philosophers that having an accurate belief of our self and the world is important. On the topic of free will and moral responsibility, Strawson argues for the pessimist viewpoint while Susan argues for the compatibilist viewpoint.

    Read More

  • Platos Repulic, book V

    1289 Words  | 3 Pages

    By looking at some modern examples, I have shown how human desire can, and often does, override reason and the law even when faced with community imposed consequences or dire punishments. While current society differs greatly from Plato’s Greece, people are still people and human instinct existed then just as it exists today. People who are denied the ability to choose if and with whom they can have sex are liable to become irrational or turn to violent means to reach that end, regardless of the era in which they live. In Plato’s ideal society these unsanctioned actions could have lead to an increased level in the public’s fear for their physical safety. Individuals consistently denied by the rulers to copulate might develop self-worth issues and finally, a pin-prick of imperfection in this utopian society may be discovered by those who are forbidden from enjoying physical relations with those they desire or love.

    Read More

  • Why Shouldn’t Tommy and Jim Have Sex? An Essay by John Corvino

    849 Words  | 2 Pages

    In John Corvino’s essay, “Why Shouldn’t Tommy and Jim Have Sex?” he advocates his argument that gay sex is not “unnatural” in any moral way. However, this argument is easy to critique when considering opposition from natural law theorists, democracy, and other perspective ideas.

    Read More

  • Critical Analysis of Schulman's Article 'Gay Marriage and Marriage'

    949 Words  | 2 Pages

    Society is created with both homosexual and heterosexual individuals. Previously when certain laws discriminated against others, such as law for women's rights to vote, these laws were changed. Changing the traditions of the country does not mean that it will lead to the legalization of other extreme issues. Each ...

    Read More

  • John Corvino's Arguments For The Morality Of Homosexuality

    971 Words  | 2 Pages

    Natural law theorists claim that actions are deemed right just because they are looked at as natural and something that is unnatural is immoral. However, there are different understandings of what is natural and what is not, which can make support for this theory hard. Examples such as homosexuality, give a strong argument against the natural law theory. We will look at the work of John Corvino as he explains the arguments for the immorality of homosexuality, but also the reasons why these arguments are not strong evidence. With these examples in mind, the fact that something is unnatural is not a good enough reason to claim something immoral.

    Read More

  • The Wolfenden Report

    1930 Words  | 4 Pages

    The committee makes several recommendations in regards to changing the laws and legislations surrounding the incrimination of homosexuals for what had previously been considered sodomy. The basic premise being that “homosexual behaviour betwe...

    Read More

  • LGBT Equal Rights: It's Time to Legalize Sodomy

    2553 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Supreme Court has resolved, by a vote of five to four that the "Constitution provided no fundamental right to engage in homosexual sodomy." (Bowers v. Hardwick) This paper will show that the analysis behind the Bowers v. Hardwick decision was flawed and limited in scope. I believe that the government does not have the right to prohibit homosexual or heterosexual consensual sodomy. Anti-sodomy laws violate the right to privacy, equal protection, and provide no reasonable compelling state interest for these violations.

    Read More

  • Queers

    996 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this age of liberation and relative morality it is no surprise that homosexuals have tried very hard to gain ground in the way of civil rights. Homosexuals say they want equal rights, and they want homosexual-marriages to be legalized. However, what they are asking for is not reasonable. They are humans; and therefore they already have the same rights as every other human living in America. What homosexuals want are special privileges and the acceptance of homosexuality as a natural alternative lifestyle, second, marriage is already clearly defined, and third because homosexuals already have the same rights, they want special privileges, and since homosexuality is not an innate quality they don’t deserve them. People who have been misinformed about what the homosexual agenda is think that homosexual marriage is natural and that it should be legalized. I however, am opposed to this because homosexuality is not a natural alternative lifestyle. First let’s define homosexuality. According to the American Heritage Dictionary, homosexuality is “having a sexual orientation to persons of the same sex.” Men and women are obviously biologically different. “People of the same sex having intercourse goes against what is biologically natural” (Baird 114). Part of the homosexual agenda is to make people believe that homosexuals are the same as heterosexuals when it comes to engaging in sexual behavior. This is absolutely not true. In Michelangelo Signorile’s book Cassel’s Rawlings 2 Queer Companion, a dictionary of lesbian and gay life and culture, he describes some of the sexual activities that homosexuals practice. These includes “fisting, when one partner shoves his whole hand up the anus of the other partner” (Signorile 96). In the essay Homosexual Rights: What’s Wrong, written by Brad Hayton and John Eldrege, they stated that “The U.S. taxpayer-funded Mapplethorpe photos. . . portraying typical homosexual behavior: fisting, urinating into anothers mouth, and andomasochism. The average homosexual has 10-106 different partners per year--300-500 in a life time” (Hayton 2). How can this be compared to heterosexual intercourse? How is this natural? It isn’t; this type of sexual behavior- even if it were practiced by heterosexuals- cannot be considered natural, in fact there are many states that have anti-sodomy laws though not enforced. As part of their agenda homosexuals not only want these things to be accepted and protected by the government, they also want them to be taught in public school as part of the sex education curriculum.

    Read More

  • Definition of Marriage Essay

    819 Words  | 2 Pages

    Recently, people have been arguing with respect to the definition of marriage. To get married is a very important event for almost everyone. Particularly for women, marriage and giving a birth could be the two major events of their lives. Andrew Sullivan and William Bennett are authors who are arguing about homosexual marriage. Sullivan believes in same-sex marriage because he thinks everyone has a right to marry. On the other hand, Bennett speaks out against Sullivan’s opinion. Bennett makes a claim that marriage is between a man and a woman structuring their entire life together. Both authors’ opinions differ on same-sex marriage. Nevertheless, their ideas are well recognized.

    Read More

  • Gay Marriage Essay

    982 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ets down to “value judgment” and how the LBG’s are being hypocritical in a way of advocating that value judgment about marriage is wrong. But yet, they insist that same sex unions might as well be considered marriages on a par with heterosexual marriages; LBG’s making a value judgment about marriages, both their own marriages and those of others. “Rather, they press their judgments on others while, at the same time, refusing to permit others to make judgments.” Bauman makes a very good point at the end of his last sentence in the article using “serves us and our offspring best” as a way to end the article. This opens minds and has you realizing that ‘offspring’ cannot be produced by a homosexual. They are incapable and therefore it could be considered unnatural stopping the natural breeding process, which leads into the next generation; creating the next generation.

    Read More

  • Refuting the Claims in Adam Kolasinski’s The Secular Case Against Gay Marriage

    910 Words  | 2 Pages

    Kolasinski begins his debate with the notion that “marriage is not a universal right.” He states that a majority of states ban many people from marrying one another – including first cousins, blood relatives, and people with venereal diseases. Although these statements hold true, the United States did not allow other “traditional” or “normal” marriages. For example, in the 1960’s, the government would not allow interracial marriages. This exemplifies how the government and the majority can sometimes be tyrannical or even wrong. Obviously, two heterosexuals of different races can marry without any government opposition. Although marriage...

    Read More

  • Michael Levin and Abnormal Homosexuality

    1539 Words  | 4 Pages

    Homosexuality is a sensitive topic and often avoided in conversation. For centuries the human race has oppressed and persecuted others strictly because they are gay, lesbian, bisexual etc. Although it is disturbing to most of us, these actions still occur in our society today, as many believe that homosexuality is abnormal and disgraceful. One supporter of this belief is Michael Levin, who strongly believes that homosexuality is highly abnormal and thus, undesirable. Although his beliefs and theories supporting this claim are subjective, there is evidence that can support his stance on this topic; we will analyze this claim in further detail and how it relates to his other views mentioned in this essay.

    Read More

  • Homosexuality Identity

    958 Words  | 2 Pages

    Discourse involves both communication as well as who is doing the communicating, how they have communicated, and what the context is for the communication. This is an important point when understanding how to define sexuality as nothing more than a social control. Sexuality has become the center of discourse in education, law, medicine, government, demography, and within the LGBT community itself. We use social controls to prohibit certain types of sex, we conduct statistical studies which help the government label and classify sexual behavior, and we even use psychiatry to evaluate the mentally ill. Although by the end of World War II homosexuality that was viewed as a “sickness or perversion that could be effectively challenged not only by physicians and psychotherapists but also by homosexuals themselves” (Meems, Gibson, Alexander 75).

    Read More

  • Heinlein's Argumentative Analysis

    586 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is never easy to see past the translucent barrier between our personal beliefs and an opposing argument. Personal experiences can close one’s mind off to other arguments. Science fiction gives writers the ability to present arguments without making them personal to the reader. This gives a higher probability that the reader will consider the argument rather than shut it out. Heinlein takes this aspect of science fiction and runs with it. He uses the futuristic aspect of science fiction to stir the mind and beliefs of the reader without offending them. He portrays most of his arguments through the characters, Mr. Dubois, Johnny Rico, Sergeant Zim and many others.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Homosexuality

    810 Words  | 2 Pages

    Homosexuality, LGBT community, and gay marriage, are all terms that are commonly heard in the news today. Whether it is a protest, a pride march, or simply a marriage license, the members of these groups are making themselves heard. There are mainly two groups concerning this movement. There is the group in support, and the group against. The question asked, “Is homosexuality immoral?” Not only that question, but also the more complicated one of why? According to a poll taken earlier this year by Statista, 63% of Americans believe gay or lesbian relations to be morally acceptable. The main reasons why Americans believe this type of lifestyle is acceptable are equal rights and personal choice. Earlier this year the American Supreme Court ruled

    Read More

More about Anderman's Argumentative Analysis

Open Document