Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Brief essay on mahabharata
Comparative politics of India
Brief essay on mahabharata
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Brief essay on mahabharata
INTRODUCTION In the history of political principles, India, like Greek, developed its principles in ancient times which may be still favourably compared to most of the principles existed in the world. Ancient Indian political thinker have developed their own tools to understand Indian Political Infrastructure and Political Obligation. To have a political obligation is to have a moral duty to obey the laws of one’s state. Political thoughts or political obligations have been significantly represented by Great Indian Epic Mahabharata which is considered as the great text of ancient Indian Polity. It deals with many political facts and abundant materials are available on political science in it. In Mahabharata an important part, from the political viewpoint is the Shanti Parva which beautifully explains Governance as integral part of all the societies. The Mahabharata theorists appraises Bhishma’s discourses in the Shanti Parva as its most authoritative exposition of Rajadharma, Dandniti, Shasanpadhiti, origin of state etc. Mahabharata is one of the …show more content…
It states that there was a contract of people to get rid of sinfulness. It states that the state emerged on the grounds that when sinfulness prevailed in the world, men cannot enjoy his own property and family. It states that in the absence of King, inter-mixture of castes may also take place. Shanti parva also described that because of absence of authority Dharma will be replaced by Adharma and it is the duty of the King to maintain dharma which signifies the defense of social order based of family, property and caste system. This can be summarized that in the state of nature, the necessity to uphold dharma, protection of property, family and varnashram by the king lead to the creation of state. The essence of ruler ship lies in dharma, the king should realize that there is nothing higher than dharma and always abide by
The relationship between cricket and politics is clearly delineated in South Asia from 1880 to 2005 through the easing of the stress between totally different caste members, although the stress mitigated wasn't forever from a religious aspect between the Pakistanis, Indians, and also the British. The various issues that arose in South Asia was largely class or caste systems (Docs 2, 3, 4), rivalry (Docs 1, 6, 10), and religious tensions (Docs 5, 7, 8, 9) against the various countries and cricket groups. Throughout its interaction with Indian politics from 1880 to 2005, cricket has served as both a unifying force between totally different political groups and also has divided political groups in periods of power struggle and political variations, as well as making sturdy bonds between countries.
In this society, one does not think, speak, or act, in a way that is beneficial for oneself. Every single citizen is indoctrinated with the belief that by acting for one’s own benefit, they are sinning. From a young age, they are taught the mantra of their society, “We are nothing. Mankind is all. By the grace of our brothers are we allowed our lives. We exist through, by and for our brothers who are the State. Amen” (21).
n President Andrew Jackson “ He’s made his decision, now let’s see him enforce it”
Would one say that Mohandas Gandhi fits the model of a Greek tragic hero? Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born on October 2, 1869, in Porbandar , India into a middle class Hindu family. Gandhi is most well-known as the leader of the Indian independence movement when India was under British oppressive rule at the start of the 18th century. Gandhi used his self-created method of satygraha, which was based on principles of truth and nonviolence as a way of protest. Because of his nonviolent civil disobedience, his goodness, and his catastrophic death, Gandhi would fit all the parts necessary to be a Greek tragic hero. The definition of a Greek tragic hero is one that has a power, flaw, and a catastrophe. Gandhi’s height in goodness was his power, and also his flaw. Gandhi was able to achieve many things for India because of his power, but it eventually led to his assassination in New Delhi. Mohandas Gandhi fits the model of a Greek tragic hero, because he has a power and a flaw that leads to a catastrophe.
Political society today, has taken many lessons from Plato and Aristotle’s political ideas. As was the case in Ancient Greece, there are many different political ideologies and regimes that will may serve the purpose for one society, but in another, could cause utter chaos. Aristotle attributed the need for there being a number of political regimes due to the fact that there are “many parts to a city.” (4.3.1) The many parts to a city that he was referring to, simply enforces the necessity of having different forms of office for each of these parts. Not every method will work for each society. Aristotle’s concepts of political regimes have deeply rooted itself in society today. In order to understand the concepts of regime as suggested by Aristotle, this paper will consider the three different types; royalty, aristocracy, and constitutional government, as well as each of their deviations.
The Indian government is corrupted and makes promises it is unable to keep. In The White Tiger, Balram describes that the government is “...the world’s greatest democracy. What a fucking joke.” (Adiga 145). When Balram lived in Laxmangarh his right to vote for the prime minister was taken from him, due to the fact that running candidates pay the current government to make sure they are elected. The government system also enables the rich to get richer. They do this by immensely taxing the poor and enforcing the caste system on the poor. The caste system is a labeling system you were born into and of what you are expected of in life. For example Balram had the caste of Halwai, which is derived from “sweet-maker”. This meant Balram was expected to work...
Political and social reform in India was achieved as a result of the European political principles brought to India by the British. Indians were Anglicised, and the British ideal for an Indian was to be "Indians in blood and colour, but English in tastes, opinions and intellect", as put by one British legislator (Rich, 214, 1979). This Western education inevitably led to well-read Indians encountering European principles such as human rights, freedoms of speech, travel and association, and liberalism.
The belief of the divine right of kings is that the king and the universe are connected. If the King performs bad acti...
Throughout history there have been a variety of theories on human nature proposed by intellectuals from different time periods. A general idea of human nature is defined as the characteristics, emotions and behavioral traits shared by all humans. During the different time periods of each philosopher, human nature varied due to its involvement in politics. Political theories and morals derive from historical imprints and observations. The precise ways to rule or govern a constitution have been questioned and emphasized through many philosophers and theorists. It is history that indicates what a long-term, obligating government may need to prosper. In order to understand a theory particular to a specific time, one must look at the author’s history and society. For example, Machiavelli, Aristotle and Frederick Douglass each come from different time periods where the structure of society differ. Societies reflect the morals and ideals that are correlated to its generation and highlight the structure and nature of the people. Thus, when looking closely at political theories, one must first observe the author’s society and history. A particular theory may influence many governments and political organizations, whether because of its validity or its rejection, both play a part in structuring a society. Human nature within each society also played a role the desire for justice. For example, during the era of the Jim Crow laws there was a clash between the beliefs of those who opposed discrimination and segregation and those who supported the laws in society. Overall, human nature plays a key role in political theories from a variety of time periods.
Aristotle, Locke, and Hobbes all place a great deal of importance on the state of nature and how it relates to the origin of political bodies. Each one, however, has a different conception of what a natural state is, and ultimately, this leads to a different conception of what a government should be, based on this natural state. Aristotle’s feelings on the natural state of man is much different than that of modern philosophers and leads to a construction of government in and of itself; government for Hobbes and Locke is a departure from the natural state of man.
Each political theorist agrees that before men came to govern themselves, they all existed in a state of nature. The state of nature is the condition men were in before political government came into existence, and what society would be if there was no government. In relation to this the two theorists raised as much praise as criticism for their famous masterpieces.
Religion in the world today serves as a unifying force to help people unite and come together. One such example of how religion unifies a society is through Ashoka and his unification of the Mauryan Empire through Buddhism. Although the Mauryan dynasty was founded by Chandragupta Maurya in 320 BC, the most famous king of the Mauryan empire was Ashoka, the grandson of Chandragupta Maurya. After he fought a brutal war and conquered Kalinga, which left over 100,000 dead, he had a revelation and converted to Buddhism (Violatti, “Ashoka”).
There is a collective existence of different forms legal systems, because of the country’s diversity in culture, language and religion. This diversity is able to flourish in India only because of representation of different communities. Diversity and pluralism are acknowledged in India which safeguards the interests of different social groups and communities. This led to law being seen as necessarily pluralistic. However, after colonisation there was an effort made by the British to make law uniform, an essential condition in what was seen as ‘modern law’. Nonetheless, after independence an effort was made to have a pluralistic legal system as this would lead to better representation of different communities. This is how the Panchayati Raj system, a form of local self-government came about. Panchayats were reintroduced in 1992 after the British rule, and there a panchayat in every town of village. The people of the village elect the members of the ‘panch’, whose responsibility is the local administration of the village. In many places, gram panchayats are also known as gram sabhas. In this manner, different forms of legal pluralism shape everyday ordering and disputing in rural and urban India. They relate to formal law as well as customary legal orders equally. The two governance systems interact, which can be termed as formal law and traditional law. Customary law is also termed as unnamed law as it does not refer to a specific basis of
Singh, Sudama. "Human Nature and Political Theory: A Historical Critical Overview." The Indian Journal of Political Science 54, no. 2 (1993): 251-272.
From the beginning of ancient history the main question for political philosophy is how a human being exists in society, who should govern the society, how should the society be governed, who are the best rulers and how should they behave themselves, what is just and what is unjust, is better to be governed through just or not, how should the states be structured? These are main questions in political philosophy, that until today are strictly discussed. The major tasks of political philosophers are to analyze the nature of human being and to evaluate the ways in which an individual relates with society he lives in. The study of human nature is one of the most important aspects of political science and philosophy. In the process of creating a form of governance it is essential to understand the innate characteristics of human nature in order to avoid a bad government for all society and to achieve the ways how people should be governed most effectively. From the ancient time the roots of justification of political power were tied to sights of human nature.