Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on Galatians
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on Galatians
The book, Studies in Galatians, by Tom Wacaster was an excellent study and very well put together. I felt he did a great job gathering others together to elaborate on some of the main points from this book. From the beginning, the author let you know, in the introduction a specific direction he was aiming toward even though the introduction seem to be a bit long. However, after I looked at it upon completion of reading, I appreciated it more than when I read it the first time. When you take second look, it made me understand the reading better. Moreover, the flow of the book was well organized, with the outline of the whole book coming after the introduction, and the remainder of the book broken down verse-by-verse, which brings the attention of the reader in a simple format. I really like the fact that he shared the ideas of others and did not hesitate to provide adequate references letting the reader know the correct source.
Nonetheless, as we begin in Chapter One, Wacaster immediately began stating his comments regarding the scripture reference, which also he did a great job transitioning immediately to breaking down the verses. Here Wacaster use adequate references and placing them in the correct location to support his take on the chapter and verses. Interestingly, the first one that caught my attention was at the beginning of the book, the introduction, when Wacaster referenced Adam Clark stating how the “Galatians were divided into three tribes” (Adam Clark). More importantly, in a concise and timely manner, Wacaster takes others input at the most opportune time to support his points.
Equally, regarding the study of the Greek language, Wacaster use verses in proper context as he often refers to the Greek translation of some...
... middle of paper ...
...bbing. Furthermore, Wacaster placed the chart of Judaism, Christianity, designed by Coffman strategically alongside his explanation of this part of his book. This is considerably, another great example of compiling your resources and placing them in intended locations that highlights the previous material. As in Chapter Five he uses “seed thoughts” from William Hendriksen and an excellent quote from Crouch in Chapter Six relating to Galatians 6:3.
Overall, this well-written book was easy to read and understand. The more I read the book, the less I didn’t want to put it down. It was strategic in form and quotes from others often highlighted the previous material talked about. This book also reminds me that, dependent on what type of book you are writing, sometimes it’s ideal to get help from others as well as use other individuals insights alongside your material.
This book was a good read for me, but I also read book reviews to help me keep track on what I am reading. These book reviews just made a better understanding of what I was reading.
In the study of the Greek language here lately Tom takes you there. He often refers to the Greek translation of some of the scriptures he is referring to. This could be good or not. For me it was good because we are currently studying Greek. For some...
This book is a very interesting read, if you have some self discipline. I mean that you need some self discipline because this book didn’t really captivate me in the sense that I couldn’t put it down. But after reading it for a while, I started to appreciate the author’s way of describing the characters and actions in this book.
According to David M. Carr, the history of Scriptural interpretation indicates that religious texts are popular candidates for reinterpretation and, as such, are spaces wherein the personal identity of the reader frequently inscribes itself at length:
My overall opinion of this book is good I really liked it and recommend it to anyone. It is a good book to read and it keep you interested throughout the whole book.
... it was nice to not feel overwhelmed by the language used in the book. Overall, this book was insightful, entertaining and extremely helpful. I loved this book and highly recommend it.
Henry, Matthew. Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible: Complete and Unabridged in One Volume. Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers Inc., 1996.
Although the greater picture is that reading is fundamental, the two authors have a few different messages that they seek to communicate to their audiences. “The Joy of Reading and Writing” depicts how reading serves as a mechanism to escape the preconceived notions that constrain several groups of people from establishing themselves and achieving success in their lifetimes. “Reading to Write,” on the other hand, offers a valuable advice to aspiring writers. The author suggests that one has to read, read, and read before he or she can become a writer. Moreover, he holds an interesting opinion concerning mediocre writing. He says, “Every book you pick has its own lesson or lessons, and quite often the bad books have more to teach than the good ones” (p.221). Although these two essays differ in their contents and messages, the authors use the same rhetorical mode to write their essays. Both are process analyses, meaning that they develop their main argument and provide justification for it step by step. By employing this technique, the two authors create essays that are thoughtful, well supported, and easy to understand. In addition, Alexie and King both add a little personal touch to their writings as they include personal anecdotes. This has the effect of providing support for their arguments. Although the two essays have fairly different messages, the authors make use of anecdotes and structure their writing in a somewhat similar
N.T Wright (2008) stated that “When we read the scriptures as Christians, we read it precisely as people of the new covenant and of the new creation” (p.281). In this statement, the author reveals a paradigm of scriptural interpretation that exists for him as a Christian, theologian, and profession and Bishop. When one surveys the entirety of modern Christendom, one finds a variety of methods and perspectives on biblical interpretation, and indeed on the how one defines the meaning in the parables of Jesus. Capon (2002) and Snodgrass (2008) offer differing perspectives on how one should approach the scriptures and how the true sense of meaning should be extracted. This paper will serve as a brief examination of the methodologies presented by these two authors. Let us begin, with an
Another great part of this book is how much Platt uses the Bible. This is more than an idea that Platt has developed and more than a bunch of cool stories. In this book David Platt lets the word of God speak through his writing. Scripture is a sword that can be used in many different ways such as preaching, but in this book David uses it through writing. If the reader has a problem with what Platt is saying then they have a problem with what the word of God
Interpreting scripture is necessary to Christian life, whether a Christian is seeking leadership in ministry or simply trying to gain understanding of scripture. Whatever end of the spectrum one falls on it is essential to interpret scripture correctly. There is a certain method to interpreting that will lead the interpreter towards success, this is the hermeneutical method. This method looks at the text of study then moves to the chapter it is in, then the book, testament, other testament, and finally the entire message of the Bible. When looking at these different sections, it is essential to research the historical and literary components of the passage. Below is an example of the hermeneutical process being put into practice on a passage from the book of Zephaniah. This student has spent time looking into the context and background of the passage and has come to an individual interpretation of Zephaniah 1:14-18.
Harris, Stephen. Understanding The Bible. 6 ed. New York City: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages, 2002. Print.
Yes, the book was well-written and easy to read. Jeff Corwin uses good quality English to convey his ideas and thoughts. More specifically, Corwin displays a masterful command of the English language by using easy-to-understand syntax, proper grammar, and simple sentence structure to allow his readers to easily understand his content. Additionally, the book is well-organized into three parts that are further organized into chapters, allowing it to be an easier read. The book also includes a glossy, bibliography, and resources to further help the reader understand the content and gather more information if they desire to do so, making it even more
This was not as easy a read for me. I suppose I am a victim of my generational upbringing, in that, I feel the need to be informed in an entertaining manner. This book has good information, but I had to continually check my focus. Those times when I was truly drawn in were the times when the writer was relating back to a story from his life or others and how it worked in to the particular habit he was teaching at that time. That being said, the following areas are where I believe I can use to make myself and my team better.
Hermeneutics is the study of these questions and whether we can bridge the gap between these different contexts? The significance of each context is crucial for readers to have balanced perspective and balanced reading of historical texts. And context is important in hermeneutics because while the Bible was written ‘for us’ it wasn’t written ‘to us’ .