Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Narrative essays for college students
Narrative essays in school
Narrative essays for college students
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the story “Marriage” by Melanie Sumner we learn that the married couple goes to counseling over a disagreement due to a dirty milk glass. Every evening the man has a glass of milk, and instead of washing it or even rinsing it out, he puts it by the sink. The wife becomes outraged because she is sick and tired of cleaning out the “disgusting milk scum.” Rather than mediating the situation, the counselor blurts out, “‘He will never, never stop drinking that glass of milk before he goes to bed, and he will never rinse it out.’” Since the ending was left out, it is our job as a class to determine the correct ending out of six alternatives. I ordered this essay in which the endings seem least realistic, to most realistic. I chose the ending that …show more content…
seemed most plausible, to me, in which the husband argues his own point of view. Connecting back to the husband, in ending [F] the husband concludes, “‘It brings me so much pleasure to see you enraged by the dirty glass.’" Although this seems realistic, I don’t believe it is the correct ending.
My father leaves his dirty dishes by the sink, and although it doesn’t annoy my mother, he doesn’t do it to make her mad. Even if he did leave them there intentionally, my mother would never become enraged.
Similarly, in ending [E] the wife becomes so “furious” she yells, “'I want a divorce!’" This can’t be the true ending either, because if the husband knew the wife was this upset, and still had a “pleasant look” on his face, they wouldn’t be at marriage counseling. It even says in the story that he was, “…a balding, middle-aged man who sat with his hands in his lap, a pleasant expression on his face.”
Speaking of facial expressions, in ending [B] the woman “looked surprised.” After thinking about the divorce, she recognizes the counselor’s “wisdom.” I think this ending is not the correct one because the counselor did not share any wisdom. He simply stated, “'There is something you need to understand…’” and followed with how the husband will “never” ever clean out his dirty milk glasses. There is no guidance or insight in that
…show more content…
declaration. In ending [A] there is a little bit of insight.
The counselor proceeds to tell the wife, “‘For as long as he has been married, he has done this simple task every night and has been happy ever since. He doesn't know what will happen if he ever stops, and he doesn't want to take the chance.’” Although it sounds cliche, it doesn’t sound completely unrealistic. However, I don’t believe this is the right ending because there is no reaction from the wife who typically has something to say about everything. We established from the beginning that the wife was the dominant character so this ending doesn’t seem correct from her end.
Unlike ending [A], in ending [C] the wife accepts “defeat and disappointment.” The counselor explains that the husband will continue leaving the dirty milk glasses on the sink because he has “free will.” Having free will means that one has the discretion to do what one wants, which is exactly what the husband does. However, I don’t believe this is the right answer because if the husband knew that his wife was going crazy, he would stop annoying
her. Finally, in ending [D], the man still seems pleasant, “‘I do things for you that I don't want to do all of the time. If you truly loved me, this one simple habit would not be so irksome.’” I believe this is the correct answer because the husband has a valid point. In relationships people have their peeves however, if they truly love the other, they can get past it. The husband keeps quiet about what he doesn’t like about the wife, and he has a smile on his face. Maybe the wife should just accept his flaws and love him for the way he is- as he does for her.
Brockmeier’s short story represents a damaged marriage between a husband and a wife simply due to a different set of values and interests. Brockmeier reveals that there is a limit to love; husbands and wives will only go so far to continually show love for each other. Furthermore, he reveals that love can change as everything in this ever changing world does. More importantly, Brockmeier exposes the harshness and truth behind marriage and the detrimental effects on the people in the family that are involved. In the end, loving people forever seems too good to be true as affairs and divorces continually occur in the lives of numerous couples in society. However, Brockmeier encourages couples to face problems head on and to keep moving forward in a relationship. In the end, marriage is not a necessity needed to live life fully.
The meaning of life and the true meaning of happiness can be pin-pointed simply by: Grow up. Get married. Have children. These three ending sentences form the basis of the main argument in “About Love”, an excerpt from “What Our Mothers Didn’t Tell Us: Why Happiness Eludes the Modern Woman” by Danielle Crittenden. Crittenden does not limit the use of her emotional appeal to repeated use of terms like “love”, “friendship” and “independence”. One of the strongest qualities supporting the thesis of “About Love” is Crittenden’s ability to use both connotative and denotative language. Crittenden goes on to say “Too often, autonomy is merely the excuse of someone who is so fearful, so weak, that he or she can’t bear to take
what was right by trying to do his best and make up to his wife about
A History of Marriage by Stephanie Coontz speaks of the recent idealization of marriage based solely on love. Coontz doesn’t defame love, but touches on the many profound aspects that have created and bonded marriages through time. While love is still a large aspect Coontz wants us to see that a marriage needs more solid and less fickle aspects than just love.
The husband was also selfish in his actions. With good intentions, the wife had planned a surprise for him, but he was not pleased. “Instead, he was hotly embarrassed, and indignant at his wife for embarrassing him” (13). When the narrator describes the husband at the beginning, he has a “self-satisfied face” (3). Embarrassment is a result of feeling self-conscious. Because of his self-conscious nature, he assesses first how the few people in the restaurant will view him because of his wife’s actions. He does not prioritize appreciation for his wife’s effort and care, but rather sees the worst in her misguided actions. The husband’s selfishness causes him to be prideful, which in turn causes him to destroy his relationship with his wife through his actions.
Margaret Atwood’s “Happy Endings” is an Author’s telling of societal beliefs that encompass the stereotypical gender roles and the pursuit of love in the middle class with dreams of romance and marriage. Atwood writes about the predictable ways in which many life stories are concluded for the middle class; talking about the typical everyday existence of the average, ordinary person and how they live their lives. Atwood provides the framework for several possibilities regarding her characters’ lives and how each character eventually completes their life with their respective “happy ending”.
In the article, “The Radical Idea of Marrying for Love” author Stephanie Coontz argues that love is not a good enough reason to get married. People shouldn’t marry just because they love one another, Coontz suggests that perhaps marriage should be based on how well a couple gets along and whether or not if the significant other is accepted by the family. One will notice in the article that Coontz makes it very clear that she is against marrying because of love. In the article is a bit of a history lesson of marriage and love within different cultures from all over the world. Coontz then states her thesis in the very end of the article which is that the European and American ways of marriage is the
...o start a new life. The freedom that she desired has been achieved and there is hope for a happier marriage after all.
realises, it is to late and he feels he has to marry her. She turns
In Margaret Atwood’s short story, “Happy Endings,” the central theme of fiction provides several different kinds of marriages and relationships that ultimately result in the same ending. The “Happy Endings” shows that it’s difficult to have complete control over day-to-day events. No matter how hard society tries to achieve the perfect life, it does not always go as planned. It doesn’t matter if the characters are bored and depressed, confused and guilty, or virtuous and lucky; the gradual path of version A is not always in reach.
From the beginning of the story, the narrator does not appear to be happy with the situation that his wife has put him in. The narrator states in the first paragraph, “I wasn’t enthusiastic about his visit. He was no one I
2. In the story, this men’s wife was very quiet, she always showed respect to the husband. Every time she wanted something or try something new he did not like, he would try to change her mind right away. “But he would always softened his no’s with a remark like What for, I’m here to
This is further proved by the way she portrays how husbands act towards their wives, including how they want someone who will not “bother” them with “rambling complaints about a wife’s duties” or “demand sexual attention” when they are not in the mood (Brady 252-253). Most content in the text, including these quotes, emphasize a very harsh and sarcastic tone, characterizing some of this essay under the pathos strategy. This harsh tone is very effective and can sway the reader’s emotions in favor of the author’s stance. Later the author mocks husbands’ decisions to divorce or “replace” their wives with new ones by stating, “If by any chance, I find another person more suitable as a wife than the wife I already have, I want the liberty to replace my current wife with another one” (Brady 203). Brady writes this to illustrate and criticize the unjust truths as to why men might divorce their
Most women in Mrs Mallard’s situation were expected to be upset at the news of her husbands death, and they would worry more about her heart trouble, since the news could worsen her condition. However, her reaction is very different. At first she gets emotional and cries in front of her sister and her husbands friend, Richard. A little after, Mrs. Mallard finally sees an opportunity of freedom from her husbands death. She is crying in her bedroom, but then she starts to think of the freedom that she now has in her hands. “When she abandoned herse...
One reason Mrs. X is not thought to be the stronger is that she goes back to her husband after she concludes that an affair had existed ironically thinking that the affair will not disable her marriage. The play implies that Mrs. X believes that the affair has and will somehow continue to make her marriage stronger. She says, "that only gave me a stronger hold on my husband," but actually her knowledge of the affair will eventually weaken the relationship. Knowing that her trust has been abused will normally cause her to question her husband's devotion: Were there other affairs? Is he cheating now? If so, is she someone I know? If not, will he cheat again? These are possible questions that will remain unanswered because Mrs. X has no intention of confronting her husband. This is a fact because in the last line of the play Mrs. X says, "Now I am going home - to love him." This quote also makes it seem like she is going home to live her normal life as if the affair never occurred, but making herself believe that it has disappeared will not solve anything. She believes th...