Student: ZHANG Yuqi (Better) Course: SACE EAL STAGE 1
Responding to Texts Task b
Essay analysis, Written (600 words) “A Hanging” By George Orwell
Nobody could look down others life; we must against the capital punishment which was anti-man and formal human nature. This is what the author wants to convey us thought this easy ‘a hanging’. From 1922 to 1927, the journalist and novelist George Orwell served in Burma as a member of Indian imperial police. Under that situation he wrote this essay. Britain administered Burma as an Indian province until 1937. Some local people and the invaders combine together to oppression the weak people. The author used three main viewpoints to express his
…show more content…
The prisoner in the essay was puny, wisp with vague liquid eyes. From this we could see that the prisoner’s life in the cell was pretty hard. A person who has such puny appearance was the invaders like to oppression. Such a weak man had held by six tall Indian warders, and their hands are all on him carefully. In contrast the prisoner showed us with easy feeling. Death in his mind was not a big deal. There had a turning point ----the puddle. When the prisoner met the puddle he avoids it like a normal person this is the human nature. Before this the author thought the prisoner was numb. However at this time he observed that this is a real man. He has his mind and behavior. He has no different with others, so we have no reason to treat him like this. This situation not only made us ponders but also shows us the author’s purpose. When the hangman climbed down and stood ready he repeat the ram over and over again with calm and rhythm .the author compare his voice as the church bell. This contrast the invaders
In George Orwell’s essay, “A Hanging,” and Michael Lake’s article, “Michael Lake Describes What The Executioner Actually Faces,” a hardened truth about capital punishment is exposed through influence drawn from both authors’ firsthand encounters with government- supported execution. After witnessing the execution of Walter James Bolton, Lake describes leaving with a lingering, “sense of loss and corruption that [he has] never quite shed” (Lake. Paragraph 16). Lake’s use of this line as a conclusion to his article solidifies the article’s tone regarding the mental turmoil that capital execution can have on those involved. Likewise, Orwell describes a disturbed state of mind present even in the moments leading up to the execution, where the thought, “oh, kill him quickly, get it over, stop that abominable noise!” crossed his mind (Orwell.
Through his poem, Ogden recites the tale of a Hangman who emotionlessly slaughtered an entire town. At first, they watched on “[out] of respect for his Hangman’s cloak”. Soon, as he took the life of another to “test the rope when the rope is new”, the village learned to part way “[out] of the fear of his Hangman’s cloak”. The opportunity presented itself time and time again, but only one person spoke against the murderer and was executed for doing so. The rest gave
Torture brings about fear and anticipation. The narrator in this story was constantly reminded of death. He was not tormented by people or the judges that sentenced him, rather he was tormented in his own mind ad thoughts. He knew, before he received his sentence, that death awaited him. He did not stand still, and he knew he could not save himself from death or escape it. The narrator did not save himself, someone else did.
For many readers, the ending of George Orwell’s 1984 is a kick to the gut. Throughout the novel George Orwell teases the audience with the idea that there was going to be some sort of happy ending, and that Winston as an individual could live his life without control of the Party. In the end, he becomes brainwashed just like every other member of society. However, as readers we should have been able to pick up that the real end came in the beginning. When Winston began writing in that journal it was the beginning of the end for him and although he claims he won the victory over himself, the only real victor, in reality, is the Party. Orwell uses the book, and specifically the last chapter, to give a warning of what it would be like to live in a totalitarian society under complete control of the government.
People in United states tend to ignore the complex problems the country is facing but focuses on the dominance of the country. People only looks at the surface of the United States and neglects problem about poverty. The bigger cities, like Los Angeles and New York, are mostly impacted by the poverty. It is important to recognize the impact of the poverty in order to understand the complex problem of the United States. In George Orwell’s “Down and Out in Paris and London”, the author provides a vivid image of the poverty and the impact on the people’s daily lives. In 1933 London and Paris, the condition of the poverty was much critical due to lack of support from the government. When we compare the 21st century poverty
George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984 follows the psychological journey of main character Winston. Winston lives in a utopian society called Oceania. There, the citizens are constantly monitored by their government coined “Big Brother” or “The Party”. In Oceania, there is no form of individuality or privacy. Citizens are also coerced to believe everything and anything the government tells them, even if it contradicts reality and memory. The goal of Big Brother is to destroy individual loyalties and make its citizenry only loyal to the government. In Orwell's novel 1984, he uses Winston's psychological journey to stress the dangers of individuality in a totalitarian regime because it can result in death. Winston’s overwhelming desire to rebel
Since rhetoric was established, arguments have been the basis of both communication and literature over the course of history. As one of the oldest and widely-used devices in rhetoric, writers –over the centuries –have used arguments to present issues to their readers in a context that uses carefully-chosen, well-composed arguments, while, at the same time, supports their cases with sound and logical reasoning in order to convince their readers that their claims are good or true. Many people, especially during the late eighteenth century and from then on, have composed arguments that were powerful enough to begin a war. Other works of rhetoric have empowered discriminated groups to band together and revolt against their oppressors in order
I strongly agree with Fromm’s viewpoints and interpretations of Orwell’s 1984 text. He warns that the future federal powers will dehumanize society and leave everyone alienated. Thus, I agree with Fromm to the extent that he acknowledges the fact that humanity can indeed cease to exist as a result of our own self-destruction as well as the effect of our actions. Many of his opinions and warnings expressed by Orwell to an extent appear in contemporary society.
In the essay “The Penalty of Death,” by H.L. Mencken, he shares with us why he disagrees with the two most commonly heard arguments of capital punishment, Mencken also shares his views on the inhuman treatment of making prisoners wait for death. Though there are those with strong opposition to capital punishment, Mencken indicates it is a universally natural human impulse that give us katharsis. Menken argues that more inhumane than the capital punishment itself is the American way of putting it off so long. It is common today to dismiss the humane treatment of those who are facing capital punishment. The three most effective rhetorical strategies Mencken uses in “The Penalty of Death” are tone, description, and examples and illustrations.
War Is Peace. Freedom Is Slavery. Ignorance Is Strength. The party slogan of Ingsoc illustrates the sense of contradiction which characterizes the novel 1984. That the book was taken by many as a condemnation of socialism would have troubled Orwell greatly, had he lived to see the aftermath of his work. 1984 was a warning against totalitarianism and state sponsored brutality driven by excess technology. Socialist idealism in 1984 had turned to a total loss of individual freedom in exchange for false security and obedience to a totalitarian government, a dysutopia. 1984 was more than a simple warning to the socialists of Orwell's time. There are many complex philosophical issues buried deep within Orwell's satire and fiction. It was an essay on personal freedom, identity, language and thought, technology, religion, and the social class system. 1984 is more than a work of fiction. It is a prediction and a warning, clothed in the guise of science fiction, not so much about what could happen as it is about the implications of what has already happened. Rather than simply discoursing his views on the social and political issues of his day, Orwell chose to narrate them into a work of fiction which is timeless in interpretation. This is the reason that 1984 remains a relevant work of social and philosophical commentary more than fifty years after its completion.
Option 4: Both King and Rawls touch on the nature of just and unjust law, while King goes a step further and argues about responding to unjust law. Write an essay about how individuals do or do not respond to unjust law.
“I had never realised what it means to destroy a healthy, conscious man.” After reading and understanding George Orwell’s feelings through his experiences in his essay “A Hanging.” We come to realize that George Orwell, a visitor from the European establishment, gets the opportunity to participate in the execution of a Hindu man. The author is degraded by what he has witnessed and experienced, and decides to share his feelings with the rest of the establishment through his writings.
Dehumanized Coping George Orwell’s essay, A Hanging, describes how he sees capital punishment inhumane to all parties. The essay is structured like a story to convey its point clearly in a way a regular essay cannot. The story follows the narrator as he finally sees a prisoner that he describes as inhumane to be someone that still has a will to live. In the story, the prisoners are often dehumanized by how they are treated while they wait for their hang. The beginning of the story starts with the narrator describing what the prisoner cells looked like with it in poor condition: We were waiting outside the condemned cells, a row of sheds fronted with double bars, like small animal cages.
The state of power established through the imperialistic backdrop show that Orwell should have control over the Burmese. Orwell is a British colonial officer in Burma, which is under the control of the British, and because of this he should have authority and control over the Burmans. The presence of the empire is established when Orwell explains that, “with one part of my mind I thought of the British Raj as an unbreakable tyranny...upon the will of the prostrate people; with another part I thought that the greatest joy in the world would be to drive a bayonet into a Buddhist priest’s gut.” (144) This ideal imperialistic circumstance, where ...
Every writer has that one special quirk that keeps readers coming back for more. Whether it is the humor or the characters, most authors carry their quirks from story to story. In “Shooting an Elephant,” George Orwell describes his experience of shooting an elephant. In “A Hanging,” he describes the emotions that run through him as he watches the hanging of a prisoner. Both essays have similar key ideas that identify Orwell as a writer. The results of pride and power contribute to the themes that connect his essays and identify Orwell as a descriptive writer.