Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast free trade and protection
Brief introduction of nafta
Brief introduction of nafta
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare and contrast free trade and protection
In this paper I will summarize the arguments for and against trade protection for United States industries. Among the measures that can be used to restrict foreign trade are tariffs and trade quotas. Industries can also get nontariff barriers, miscellaneous legislation which give domestic products an advantage. In general, experts agree that restricted foreign trade benefits workers and domestic businesses, while under free trade consumers have a greater quantity and quality of choices available to them. [1] I will also look at arguments for and against NAFTA, an important trade agreement between the countries of North America. Tariffs are perhaps the most common way to restrict, or at least slightly discourage, foreign imports. Tariffs are, quite simply, taxes on imported goods. The thought behind imposing tariffs upon these goods is that it will cost more for foreign producers to sell their goods in the United States. However, the tariff is often passed down to the consumer. Even if the buyer can afford the cheaper American substitute for the product, the consumer is still robbed of fair choices between substitutes which throws off the fundamental forces of the market. Thus goes the anti-tariff argument. [2] Tariff-based protectionism does have its benefits, though. Due to fluctuations in currency prices, it is sometimes possible for foreign exporters to charge unnaturally low prices for their products. This is called dumping and will greatly reduce the sales of the domestic competitor. A tariff can be added to artificially raise the price of the foreign product. While this comes at the expense of consumers who wish to buy the cheapest products, it benefits American businesses and thus can indirectly benefit cons... ... middle of paper ... ...edcontent.com/article/1362775/tariffs_import_quotas_and_exchange.html?cat=3. Accessed 03/02/10 [3] Mike Moffatt. About.com: Economics. "Tariffs - The Economic Effect of Tariffs" http://economics.about.com/cs/taxpolicy/a/tariffs.htm. Accessed 03/02/10 [4] Mike Moffatt. About.com: Economics. "Why Are Tariffs Preferable to Quotas?" http://economics.about.com/cs/taxpolicy/a/tariffs_quotas.htm. Accessed 03/02/10 [5] Import Quotas. "http://www.albany.edu/~aj4575/LectureNotes/Lecture21.pdf. Accessed 03/02/10 [6] Turley Mings and Matthew Marlin, [The Study of Economics: Principles, Concepts & Applications] (Dushkin McGraw-Hill, 2000) 413-414. [7] Walter R. Mears, "Clinton Broadens Argument for NAFTA". [McCook Daily Gazette] 27 Sept 1993. Google News Archive. http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=btogAAAAIBAJ&sjid=TWsFAAAAIBAJ&pg=1352%2C2596344. Accessed 03/03/10
In the acclaimed novel, The Choice: A Fable of Free Trade and Protectionism, author Russell Roberts, an economist and writer, tells a fictional story that enlightens readers to the wonders of the economic system. Russell provides an insightful, thought provoking story that illustrates protectionism and free trade, while making the concepts and arguments easy to comprehend.
In December of 1992, Presidents Salinas (Mexico), Bush (U.S.) and Prime Minister Brian Mulroney of Canada signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The Mexican legislature ratified NAFTA in 1993 and the treaty went into effect on January 1, 1994, creating the largest free-trade zone in the world.
Trading internationally, along with foreign trading policies has always been a controversial issue in America. Free trade is just as taboo if not more so. Today, the United States has made an attempt to maintain an open market of trading. Free trading greatly benefits a nation’s economy. The history of trade in The United States dates back over half a century ago. Through a substantial part of history, the United States had implemented rather extensive barriers and restrictions regarding importation, in order to better protect domestic suppliers from any serious foreign rivalry. Regardless, of Government restrictions and barriers set in place to avoid foreign competition it is healthy for our nation to have motivation and have the desire to
In 1994, the most controversial alliance between nations took its affect. NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) was the agreement to have free trade between Canada, United States and Mexico. According to the Institute for International Economics one million workers in 1995 would owe their jobs to U.S. exports to Mexico. Some 175,000 of those would be new jobs in higher paying sectors (Mohn 2007). Although it was suppose to drastically increase trade and create jobs, in many ways had the reverse affect. The environment took a backseat to the corporate greed. With the increase of trade, the pollution increased and the quality of goods decreased significantly. Our country lost more jobs than it gained. We have become increasingly dependent on other countries. The United States has sat by silently as the pollution from unregulated foreign low-wage manufacturing plants infiltrates our earth's rivers, air, and ground water. Our government has turned their heads on workers in other countries as well as our own, being exploited and forced to work in conditions not fit for and animal. NAFTA may have increased trade but at what cost? It looks like even the United States can be bought. The U. S. Government no longer controls our country, big business does.
In his article The Uncomfortable Truth About NAFTA: It’s Foreign Policy, Stupid published November 1993, Paul Krugman breaks down the North American Free Trade Agreement and arguments the opposition brings to the table. These arguments include NAFTA affecting the number of jobs in the United States, helping or hurting the environment, potential benefit, wage decrease for unskilled workers and foreign policy.
Over the past few decades, free trade has been seen by neo-liberalists as an excellent way to ensure economic growth and development. So for the past few years, the United States and 11 other nations have been negotiating the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), an economic trade agreement that would promote economic progress and cooperation. Supporters of this trade pact argue that the TPP would foster economic growth, assert American influence over Chinese influence, and help improve environmental and labor laws among participating countries. However, critics of this agreement content that this deal will lead to American job losses and trade deficits, pharmaceutical monopolies on drugs and drug prices, and the lack of protection against currency
In order for a country to run well, it is crucial to provide the goods and services that its citizens need and want. Some countries are able to produce many different goods efficiently while others struggle. This could be because economic resources vary by country, not all nations are experts in the same technologies, and some consumers prefer different quality in the goods that they purchase. For these reasons, it is beneficial for nations to trade. However, there are several protection measures that are necessary for nations to take while engaging in trade, including tariffs, import quotas, and other trade barriers.
What problem do trade agreements attempt to solve? An answer to this question is necessary to understand trade agreements. For years there was a consensus among economists that a trade agreement's fundamental role was to prevent the prisoner's dilemma that results from nations using trade policy to manipulate their terms of trade in their favor. But this consensus has been challenged by the possibility of other motives for trade protection that arise in the presence of imperfect competition. A government can also use trade policy to attract profits, employment, and firms within its borders. This variety of motives then raises the question of whether there exists a purpose for trade agreements distinct from that found in the perfectly competitive benchmark.
Sullivan, A., & Steven M., (2003). Economics: Principles in action. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey : Pearson Prentice Hal
“The tariff also helps protect jobs in the industry that has eliminated the foreign competition but a negative impact is felt because it causes the consumer to pay more for a product that is imported” (Hill, 2004). If a country it prone to levy tariffs on items that an organization may need, it would increase the risk of doing business while located in that company. By having a country manufacture or produce product that can be done for less elsewhere is not a wise utilization of resources and in turn harms global trade. Tariff is a tax applied to an import and is one of the oldest trade policies in effect. This tax is generally revenue for the host country’s government. There are two types of tariffs; specific tariff and ad valorem tariff (Hill, 2004). “A specific tariff applies a set tax to a certain import. If a specific tax of fifty cents were applied to wine then the government would gain 50 cents from every bottle coming into the United States without regard to the price of the wine. An ad valorem tax is applied at a fixed percentage of the value of
Free trade in today’s economy allows so much more than just jobs and goods at lower prices for Americans. Compared to the foreign competition, the free trade benefits outweigh any risks the foreign competition might impose on the US. As said by Denise Froning in her article, free trade benefits in four ways. “Free trade promotes innovation and competition, Free trade generates economic growth, Free trade disseminates democratic values, and Free trade fosters economic freedom.” Societies that enact free trade policies create their own economic enthusiasm, nurturing freedom, job opportunities, and success that benefit every citizen. Free trade is the only type of fair trade because it offers consumers the most choices and best standards to improving their type of living. Also by fostering opportunitie...
One of the most cited arguments for intervention is that of protecting jobs and industries from unfair foreign competition (Hill). While industries like aerospace are protected given their importance for national security, job protection appears as a result of unions and industries putting political pressure given the threat of more efficient foreign firms (Hill). Many countries achieve this by increasing the tariffs on imports of foreign products. What really happens when a certain industry is ...
First of all, one of the ways a government can help its nation is by imposing tariffs. The basic definition of a tariff is a tax, which is placed on an imported or exported product, by the government. The imported good can be charged per unit, for example two dollars per bag of rice, or by percentage, for instance 15 percent charge on the price of a tractor (Caballero). There are many ways these taxes can be helpful. Firstly, they can protect domestic producers from international competition. A government may use a protective tariff to artificially increase the price of an imported good. For example, if there’s a 50 percent tax on a machine which is imported and was originally sold for 100 dollars, it will now cost 150 dollars. Local companies can then sell the same machine for 149 dollars (Martin Frost). By raising the tariff on an imported good, it makes domestic goods seem more appealing to consumers because of their low prices, by creating a better national economy. Also, a revenue tariff can be imposed on a good which is not produced in the country. It is basically an amount created to make money for the government. For example, if a country does not produce any rice, it can place a revenue tariff on it and have a constant stream of earnings. There is also another type of tariff called ‘export tariff’. Though it isn’t used ...
Free trade is a form of economic policy which allows countries to import and export goods among each other with no government interference. In recent years there has been a general consensus in economist’s stance on free trade. They view free trade as an asset. Free trade allows for an abundance of goods with increased varieties and increased availability. The products become cheaper for consumers and no one company monopolizes an industry. The system of free trade has been highly controversial. While free trade benefits consumers it has the potential to hurt manufacturers and businesses thus creating a debate between supporters of free trade and those with antagonistic positions.
Protectionism is an economic policy that restricts free trade in order to protect domestic market from foreign competition in the way of different interventions by the government. Countries engage in protectionism in order to achieve political, social and economic goals, to benefit the domestic goods or interests. To create jobs by protecting industries from foreign competition and to change the competitive environment. Behind all of these arguments for protectionism the results from restrictions can lead to price inflation because supply is restricted and therefore domestic prices increase and the consumption level decreases because of