Analysis: The Texas Court Structure

311 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: The texas court system quizlet

The Texas Court Structure is a very complex concept. It consists of many appeals, and different types of courts. Although the structure is designed to keep things running smoothly, the system comes across as more rough than smooth. In the Texas court structure there are four levels of court that make the structure whole. The first is trial courts of limited jurisdiction, second is trial courts of general jurisdiction, third is appellate courts, and last but not least the state high court of last resort (Neubauer, 2015 pg.121). All these courts have different responsibilities that help make up what the Texas court structure is. To begin, Trial courts of limited jurisdiction also known as “inferior courts” are courts that make up “85% of

Show More
Related

  • Essay On Texas Constitution Of 1876

    589 Words  | 2 Pages

    The principles, which define the work of juridical branch, are relevant nowadays, as they have proved their effectiveness and managed to gain confidence of population. Texas juridical branch is complex and confusing. According to the principles of the Texas Constitution, six types of courts are established, some of which have simultaneous or overlapping jurisdictions. In accordance with the Texas Constitution of 1876, two high courts were established. In addition, in the traditions of Jacksonian Democracy, all the judges in Texas courts should be ready to compete with electoral politics and take their positions according to the results of partisan elections. This democratic principle of fair elections and respect to the votes of citizens is still applied in the juridical branch of Texas

    Read More

  • Similarities Between The Constitution And Texas Constitution

    651 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...iminal code, and the Court of Criminal Appeals, both are equal in prominence and decision-making capability. M most positions in the US Government outside of the President and Congress are appointed by the President, confirmed by the Senate. In Texas, only the Governor's and Lt. Governor's aides and some cabinet positions are appointed, all other positions are elected, including that of the State Attorney General, Comptroller of Public Accounts (basically, the State Accountant and Tax Assessor), and Railroad Commissioner (who controls and regulates the state's land and mineral resources).

    Read More

  • Dual Court System Q&A

    1218 Words  | 3 Pages

    pleas may be choose for the punishment likely to be associated with them rather than for their accuracy in describing the criminal offense in which the defendant was involved. For instance, a charge of indecent liberties, for example, in which the defendant is accused of sexual

    Read More

  • Texas v. Johnson Argumentative

    691 Words  | 2 Pages

    To this day, Americans have many rights and privileges. Rights stated in the United States constitution may be simple and to the point, but the rights Americans have may cause debate to whether or not something that happens in society, is completely reasonable. The Texas v. Johnson case created much debate due to a burning of the American Flag. One may say the burning of the flag was tolerable because of the rights citizens of the United States have, another may say it was not acceptable due to what the American flag symbolizes for America. (Brennan and Stevens 1). Johnson was outside of his First Amendment rights, and the burning of the American flag was unjust due to what the flag means to America.

    Read More

  • Lawrence V. Texas

    1308 Words  | 3 Pages

    Lawrence v. Texas In the case Lawrence v. Texas (539 U.S. 558, 2003) which was the United States Supreme Court case the criminal prohibition of the homosexual pederasty was invalidated in Texas. The same issue has been already addressed in 1989 in the case Bowers v. Hardwick, however, the constitutional protection of sexual privacy was not found at that time. Lawrence overruled Bowers and held that sexual conduct was the right protected by the due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. The effects of the ruling were quite widespread and led to invalidation of the similar laws throughout the United States that tried to criminalize the homosexual activity of adults who were acting in privacy.

    Read More

  • What Are The Benefits And Disadvantages Of The Texas Court System

    885 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Texas court system, judges are elected instead of appointed like in the federal government. In the federal government, the president appoints members to the Supreme Court. This appointment then heads to Senate where the members of Senate will take a vote

    Read More

  • The Texas Government: The Branches Of The Texas Government

    1072 Words  | 3 Pages

    The judicial branch in Texas works the same as that of the federal judicial branch and its role is to interpret the laws. The Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is the chief legal and law enforcement officer of the State of Texas. The judicial branch oversees enforcement and making of laws to ensure that they are operating within the framework of the original charters of governmental power. The judicial branch checks the power of both legislative and executive branches by declaring if laws and acts passed are unconstitutional. The Texas judicial branch settles disputes and determines if someone is guilty or innocent when charged with violating the law. It also settles the estates of the deceased. It runs jails and prisons, monitors parolees, and in extreme cases, carries out the death penalty on people convicted of a capital felony. The Texas judiciary department includes five levels of courts. The lower levels are the trial courts, similar to the federal system. Appellate courts hear the appeals of both civil and criminal cases from the lower courts. Unlike the federal system, the top of the Texas judicial hierarchy is divided into two supreme courts, the court of criminal appeals and the Texas Supreme Court for civil

    Read More

  • Texas Attorney General Case

    1039 Words  | 3 Pages

    In simple terms, a state attorney general is essentially the state’s lawyer, but he/she has many more responsibilities than that. It should come as no surprise that a state as large as Texas requires a lot of its government officials. A person in this position is the chief legal officer and is charged with protecting the interests of the state. This is typically done through giving legal advice or court proceedings. As the state’s lawyer, they can advise other Texas government agencies on how to make sure they are operating legally. More commonly, lawyers usually operate in court, and the attorney general is no different. If the state of Texas is ever directly involved in a case, the attorney general represents their state in both local and federal courtrooms such as taxes owed to the state or against those that violate any environmental-protection laws ("Attorney General," 2010). Being in the executive branch, the Texas attorney general reports to the governor: “The attorney general shall report to the governor on the first Monday of December of each even-numbered year. The report must include the following information for the preceding two years: (1) a summary of the cases in which the state was a party that was acted on by the supreme court and court of criminal appeals; and (2) a summary of civil cases in which the state was a party that were prosecuted or defended by the attorney general

    Read More

  • Texas Government

    1011 Words  | 3 Pages

    Our government here in Texas has three major parts that play a significant part in our decision making process. These levels have been deigned to decentralize power and make it more affective for the public's needs. The primary level is the Texas legislature. It is almost a given to say that everyone has at least heard of the legislature. Some variables that the legislature contains are the Lt. Governor, the Speaker of the house of Representatives and Committee Chairs. The Speaker acts as the presiding officer over the house and has two levels of power. These two levels are institutional powers which allow the officer to preside over the Legislative Audit Committee and Sunset Advisory Committee.

    Read More

  • Structure of the Federal Court System

    1304 Words  | 3 Pages

    Before the adoption of the United States Constitution, the U.S. was governed by the Articles of Confederation. These articles stated that almost every function of the government was chartered by the legislature known as Congress. There was no distinction between legislative or executive powers. This was a major shortcoming in how the United States was governed as many leaders became dissatisfied with how the government was structured by the Articles of Confederation. They felt that the government was too weak to effectively deal with the upcoming challenges. In 1787, an agreement was made by delegates at the Constitutional Convention that a national judiciary needed to be established. This agreement became known as The Constitution of the United States, which explicitly granted certain powers to each of the three branches of the federal government, while reserving other powers exclusively to the states or to the people as individuals. It is, in its own words, “the supreme Law of the Land” (Shmoop Editorial Team).

    Read More

  • Essay On The Court System

    1988 Words  | 4 Pages

    First, according to justice.gov, “The federal court system has three main levels: district courts, circuit courts, and the Supreme Court of the United States.” The courts all have a different role to play in the judicial system. Court systems exist to provide justice for all. Now, the district court system is the beginning of the judicial system. A good amount of the cases handled by the district court system are either criminal or civil trial cases.

    Read More

  • Legal Research, Writing, And Analysis

    1457 Words  | 3 Pages

    The US court system consists of a trial court, an appellate court, and a supreme or high court. The trial court is the first to hear the facts of a case and has original jurisdiction. The appellate court hears cases whose resolution is disputed by the losing party in the trial court. The supreme or high court hears cases whose outcome is disputed by the losing party in the appellate court. The supreme or high court chooses which cases warrant a hearing. The federal and the state court system have the same basic structure. Each consists of a trial court, an appellate court, and a supreme or high court. The Federal Court of Appeals has thirteen (13) circuits which cover most states except the District of Columbia. The federal system also has specialty courts such as the Court of Federal Claims and the United States Tax Court.

    Read More

  • Texas Executive Branch

    1039 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Texas Constitution delegates authority to three departments; Legislative, Executive, and Judicial. The Legislative Department

    Read More

  • Court Structures: The Florida Court System

    655 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Florida court system is composed of four different court structures. First, there is the Supreme Court, which is the highest court system in Florida and according to Florida Courts website, “Decisions stemming from Florida’s highest court have helped shape, certainly, the state itself, but the nation as a whole.” (FL Courts, n.d.) The Supreme Court is comprised of seven Justices and at least five of those Justices must contribute in every case and four must agree so a resolution can be reached. Secondly, there is the District Courts of Appeal which provides the chance for a thoughtful review of decisions of lower hearings by a multi-judge panel. “District Courts of Appeal correct harmful errors and ensure that decisions are consistent with

    Read More

  • Judicial System In South Korea

    1119 Words  | 3 Pages

    This part of the tier is called the appellate level. There are five high courts located in South Korea. They are all located in the major cities, such as Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Gwangju, and Daejon. High courts are not the only appellate courts in the Korean system. High courts hear appeals from judgements, rulings or orders rendered either by a panel of three judges of district courts or the family courts, or by the Administrative Court ("Supreme Court of Korea," 2012). They hear appeals from cases when the amount in dispute go over fifty million Korean won. Appellate jurisdiction in civil cases is divided among high courts and district courts. High court judges are appointed by legal profession who apply for the position with a large amount of legal experience, and the appointee would not be moved to district courts unless there are special

    Read More

More about Analysis: The Texas Court Structure

Open Document