Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay french revolution history
Essay french revolution history
Essay french revolution history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay french revolution history
Which Truth is Right? Natalie Davis, a modern historian, studies French peasants during the sixteenth century such as Martin Guerre. After exposure to multiple sources and stories about Martin Guerre’s life, Davis yearned to portray his story more accurately. She then expertly crafted an array of sources together to create the story, but she was also forced to invent portions due to a lack of evidence. Eventually, she created the novel, The Return of Martin Guerre, which painted a new and deeply thorough perspective about Martin Guerre’s life. Another respected historian, Robert Finlay, authorized a rebuttal against the invented sections within the novel. He believed that Davis’ fabricated sections were historically inaccurate, claiming …show more content…
In Finlay’s rebuttal, “The Refashioning of Martin Guerre”, one element he challenged was Davis’ lack of historical sources; according to him, Davis uses her insight, not evidence to falsely infer that Bertrande …show more content…
Finlay strikes a claim that Davis’ statements about Bertrande’s recognition does not derive from “an interpretation based on sources” but from her “unsubstantiated insight.” (“The Refashioning of Martin Guerre”, p559). Finlay believes that Davis thinks there is “inevitable sexual recognition” because the touch of each man is different (“The Refashioning of Martin Guerre”, p559). Davis then counteracts this statement by showing us her source, Jean d’Arras, a fifteenth century author about marriage faithfulness through the protagonists Raimondin and Melusine. Jean d’Arras, describes the unique touch, trust, and look of two lovers when their marriage bed was blessed; for the ceremony, they were naked save their headdresses. With the use of this information, Davis applied Jean d’Arras’ words to Bertrande and Arnaud’s physical relationship, “she[Bertrande] was feeling a body unlike the one she had lain next to...clothed or unclothed.”(“On the Lame”, 578). Davis utilizes Jean d’Arras as a respectable source to prove that a woman would know the difference of touch between men despite being clothed or not. Davis did not outrightly call out Finlay, but she does provide evidence against his claim proving that she fabricated an accurate account with the use of Jean d’Arras’ source. Ultimately, Davis indirectly proves that Bertrande
Is it true Americans are rightfully notorious for creating inaccurate paradigms of what really happened in historical events Americans are tied to? Has America ever censored historical events in order to protect Americans innocent democratic reputation? After reading, “The Best War Ever” by Michael C.C Adams, I have found the answers to these questions to be yes. Some of the myths that Adams addresses in his book include: 1. America was innocent in world war two and was an ever acting protagonist in the war; 2. World war two or any war for that matter can be, or is a “good war” and bring prosperity to America; 3. War world two brought unity to Americans.
In this documentary report I shall look at the account of Urban II’s speech we are given by Fulcher of Chartres and assess it’s usefulness according to it’s likely reliability and it’s concurrence with the other accounts of Urban’s speech and the evidence we have from his letters. I shall first look at who Fulcher of Chartres was, as his role in society is important for understanding how he may have come to be aware of or present at the council of Clermont. A brief look at Fulcher will also provide an insight into what his opinions may have been and how this may colour his representation of the events. I shall also look at the message as we see it in Fulcher’s version of events and then at the overall view we are given from the evidence. I shall also look at the conclusions that ‘modern’ scholars have come to. Finally I shall look at the outcomes of this council and how much the outcomes reflect the aims we are told about in the accounts of the council of Clermont.
The Return of Martin Guerre, written by Natalie Zemon Davis, is the tale of a court case that takes place in sixteenth century France. Martin Guerre is a peasant who deserted his wife and family for many years. While Martin Guerre is gone, a man named Arnaud du Tilh arrives at Martin’s village and claims to be Martin Guerre. Bertrande, who is Guerre’s wife, Guerre’s sisters, and many of the villagers, accepts the imposter. After almost three years of being happily married, Bertrande takes the fraud to court under pressure of Pierre Guerre, her stepfather and Guerre’s brother. Arnaud du Tilh is almost declared innocent, but the real Martin Guerre appears in the courthouse. Throughout this tale, many factors of the peasant life are highlighted. The author gives a very effective and detailed insight to a peasant’s life during the time of Martin Guerre. Davis does a successful job of portraying the peasant lifestyle in sixteenth century France by accentuating the social, cultural, and judicial factors of everyday peasant life.
Both Fernie and Blanche have a peculiar effect on men, somehow drawing them in without appearing to be interested in any romantic or sexual action whatsoever; this paradox entices many lovers who all feel a strange attachment to these women afterward. A parallel can be drawn to the creamy whiteness of Fernie’s mulatto complexion and Blanche’s name meaning ‘white’ in French: both women intrinsically posses the illusion of virginal virtue that overlaps their blatant sexuality. The unnamed visitor from the North in Crane described Fernie’s eyes as those that ‘desired nothing you could give her… [but] men saw her eyes and fooled themselves’ (Toomer 648), creating a mass following of men who after having affairs with her become ob...
Leonce Pontellier, the husband of Edna Pontellier in Kate Chopin's The Awakening, becomes very perturbed when his wife, in the period of a few months, suddenly drops all of her responsibilities. After she admits that she has "let things go," he angrily asks, "on account of what?" Edna is unable to provide a definite answer, and says, "Oh! I don't know. Let me along; you bother me" (108). The uncertainty she expresses springs out of the ambiguous nature of the transformation she has undergone. It is easy to read Edna's transformation in strictly negative terms‹as a move away from the repressive expectations of her husband and society‹or in strictly positive terms‹as a move toward the love and sensuality she finds at the summer beach resort of Grand Isle. While both of these moves exist in Edna's story, to focus on one aspect closes the reader off to the ambiguity that seems at the very center of Edna's awakening. Edna cannot define the nature of her awakening to her husband because it is not a single edged discovery; she comes to understand both what is not in her current situation and what is another situation. Furthermore, the sensuality that she has been awakened to is itself not merely the male or female sexuality she has been accustomed to before, but rather the sensuality that comes in the fusion of male and female. The most prominent symbol of the book‹the ocean that she finally gives herself up to‹embodies not one aspect of her awakening, but rather the multitude of contradictory meanings that she discovers. Only once the ambiguity of this central symbol is understood can we read the ending of the novel as a culmination and extension of the themes in the novel, and the novel regains a...
The Return of Martin Guerre written by Natalie Davis gives the audience a rare glimpse into the world of peasant life in sixteenth century France. It also allows a modern day audience a chance to examine and to compare their own identities and questions of self. What makes the story so interesting to modern day viewers and readers is how relevant the story and the people in it are to our own times. This story is about a history of everyday people rather than royalty and generals, history's usual subjects.
In 1998, Francine du Plessix Gray, prolific author of novels, biographies, sociological studies and frequent contributions to The New Yorker, published her most acclaimed work to date: At Home with the Marquis de Sade: A Life. A Pulizer Prize finalist that has already appeared in multiple English-language editions as well as translated ones, Du Plessix Gray’s biography has met with crowning achievement and recognition on all fronts. Accolades have accumulated from the most acclaimed of eighteenth-century luminaries, such as Robert Darnton, in a lengthy review in The New York Review of Books that compares her biography with Laurence Bongie’s Sade: A Biographical Essay, to the list of scholars whom she thanks in her acknowledgements for having read the manuscript: Lynn Hunt, Lucienne Frappier-Mazur, and Marie-Hélène Huët. Surely, any scholar can appreciate the vast amount of research that undergirds Du Plessix Gray’s narrative, and indeed, she takes great pains to meticulously inform the reader who might care to look at her sources and read her acknowledgements that she has done her homework and knows every inch of the scholarly terrain. Du PlessixGray wisely begins her acknowledgements with a debt of gratitude to Maurice Lever’s studies, which rest on years of archival research.
The “beautiful young woman” began to show her stubborn ways early. According to the reading, Bertrande was concerned more about putting aside her wifely duties than to ruin her reputation and independence (27-28). When Martin abandoned Bertrande, she was left without a defined position in the village social structure. Being the honest women that Coras said she was, Bertrande would not separate from Martin, and under Catholic law she could not remarry unless there was strong proof of death. The values that Bertrande grew up with showed that she never saw herself leaving village customs (32). Though the devastating experience of Martin leaving left her weak and yearning for a husband, she lived “virtuously and honorably” through her “stiff-necked sense of herself and her reputation” (34).
In the short story “No One Is a Mystery” by Elizabeth Tallent the reader is introduced to a nameless female character. Throughout the story there are various descriptions that has great subtext to the relationship between the narrator and her lover Jack. One of the best descriptions in the short story is when the narrator is staring at Jack’s boot. The description Tallent uses makes the reader use one of their five senses, she makes the reader focus on the sense of touch. Tallent writes of boot’s frayed thread and scuffed toes. Another good description of the sense was muddy manure. The last part of the description is when the narrator gives a telling detail about the relationship between the two. She mentions that Jack has been wearing the
For example, he treats some women with little respect. The novel states, “ And [Robert] related the story of Alcee Arobin and the consul’s wife; and another about the tenor of the French Opera, who received letters which should never have been written…” (20). This shows that Alcee has been with multiple women, and he has, from what can be inferred, written bad letters to them. He seems to have casted these women aside now and moved on showing little respect for them which was not what a man should have. Moreover, he moves in on married women. The novel states, “When he leaned forward and kissed [Edna], she clasped his head, holding his lips to hers” (84). Although Edna returned the kiss, it still does not excuse the fact that Alcee initiated the kiss on a known married women. Men during the time did not try to take what other men already had as the reader is shown when Robert says goodbye to Edna for the reason of her marriage to Leonce. Additionally, Alcee does what he wants to women. The novel states, “‘ I am, after I have said good night[,]’ [said Alcee.] ‘Good night,’ [Edna] murmured. He did not answer, except to continue to caress her. He did not say good night until she had become supple to his gentle, seductive entreaties” (94). Edna tries to tell Alcee to leave, although not in a very commanding way, but he refuses until he gets what he wants from her. Men at the time had more respect from
Irigaray, Luce. “That Sex Which is Not One.” The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends. Ed. David H. Richter. Boston: Bedford Books, 1998. 1467-1471.
“The Wife of Bath’s Tale” is written in an entertaining and adventurous spirit, but serves a higher purpose by illustrating the century’s view of courtly love. Hundreds, if not thousands, of other pieces of literature written in the same century prevail to commemorate the coupling of breathtaking princesses with lionhearted knights after going through unimaginable adventures, but only a slight few examine the viability of such courtly love and the related dilemmas that always succeed. “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” shows that women desire most their husband’s love, Overall, “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” shows that the meaning of true love does not stay consistent, whether between singular or separate communities and remains timeless as the depictions of love from this 14th century tale still hold true today.
It seems that in ordinary life, we are most likely to distinguish between a man and a woman by clothing. This is more difficult to do in the present day, in which women have adapted much traditionally male clothing for their own use, but in the time periods in which Orlando is set it was still the case that men and women wore distinct clothing. If we consider our everyday experience, it becomes clear that this is the means we use, at least from a distance. Other cues such as hairstyle, quality of voice, and so on enter the equation later, but clothing comes first. A man with long hair is eccentric at worst; a man wearing a dress runs the risk of being beaten to a pulp for this transgression. People wishing to undergo a sex-change operation must undergo a period of living as the opposite gender before going through with surgery - the first and most important thing invariably done here is to purchase a new wardrobe.
As previously mentioned the anatomy had a great deal to do with how sensibility was addressed. In the comprehension of the cult of sensibility, an awareness of the effects of the nerves in one’s body is imperative. As such, sexual organs had a strong impact on the sensible individual’s thought process. Inasmuch as most novels from the period do not delve into the particulars of the impact of one’s private parts, the charged interactions between characters drew from their particular
The adjective “nameless” used to describe homoerotic love was never fully articulated until the Oscar Wilde trial. England in the year1895 (Kennedy 5), like Germany, punished sodomy with strict jail time. As in Germany, where it seemed no bourgeois male member of society was safe from speculation of his sexual orientation, famed author, Oscar Wilde was not immune to speculation in England. During his sodomy trial, Wilde, when questioned about the content of a ‘questionable’ poem by Lord Alfred Douglas (Two Loves), Oscar replied with his findings as: “the Love that dare not speak its name” (5). Scholars speculate that this is in fact where John Henry MacKay acquired “nameless”, in order to describe (or not describe) his attracti...