Average Collection Period (Days) of XERO decreased to 63.36 days in 2015 from 74.85 days which means that debtors of XERO will pay or collection payment from debtors can be done in 2 months approximately which is good as company can receive its cash early now which can be used for paying operating and administrative expenses. Subscriptions are charged one month in arrear through direct debit but as XERO is scattered over the world, receiving payment collection in two months from oversees is a fair time. (XERO Annual Report, 2015) Fixed Asset Turnover has fallen from 1.47 in 2014 to 1.46 in 2015 which is very minimal; indeed, this can have impact on the operating performance of the company. The effect of this fall can be easily recovered as there was a great increase in the revenue. The fall shows that company is not effective in getting utilization from fixed assets. (XERO Annual Report, 2015) …show more content…
(XERO Annual Report, 2015) Such a fall may because of the losses incurred by XERO over the last two years which is why shareholders are not paid off dividends. This will lower the price of XERO shares in New Zealand. XERO’s share price fall suddenly after the losses got double in the current year. XERO started the current financial year with $269m worth of cash including $147m raised from its investors. XERO’s share price almost halved over the last year. (Radionz XERO Doubles Annual Loss, n.d.) There has been an increase in the weighted average number of ordinary shares on issue from 120,533,000 in 2014 to 127,323,000 in 2015. Whereas net tangible assets (cents) gone up from $2.12 in 2014 to $ 2.71 in 2015 because of overall increase in total net assets by 35.6%. (XERO Annual Report, 2015) Price earnings ratio of XERO increased from -135 in 2014 to -43.81 in 2015. A higher P/E ratio shows that there will more investors attracted for XERO. (nz.finance XERO Price History,
Instead of the above letter, assume that at Pablo’s retirement dinner, the chairman of the board of directors of Xerxes Corps., in his speech, said “In view of the fact that you have been faithful to Xerxes Corp. for 30 years and have resisted efforts of our competitors to hire you away from us, the corporation promises to pay you a pension of $100,000 a year for life.” Pablo stood up and said, “I accept your pension promise with gratitude.” Is Xerxes Corps.’s promise enforceable by Pablo and if not, what would be necessary to make it enforceable? Explain.
In order to determine the value of operations, and using proforma income statement and balance sheet statement, Cash flow statement was formulated for the next 5 years. The Account Receivables plus the Inventory minus the Account Payable was determined as Net Operating Working Assets. An organization cost of 0,000 was amortized over the 5-year period.
The 3 percent decline in sales causing a 21 percent decline in profits can be attributed to the identification of the accounting concept of operating leverage. Operating leverage is what business managers apply to boost small changes in revenue into sizable changes in profitability. Fixed cost is the force managers use to attain disproportionate changes between revenue and profitability. Therefore, when all costs are fixed every sales dollar contributes one dollar toward the potential profitability of a project. Once sales dollars cover fixed costs, each additional sales dollar represents pure profit. A small change in sales volume can significantly affect profitability (Edmonds, Tsay, & Olds, 2011). So, therefore, if sales volume increases,
Looking at the individual ratios seen in exhibit 1 and comparing it to the industry average shown in exhibit 2 gives a sense of where this company stands. Current ratio and quick ratio are really low and have been decreasing. For 1995, the current ratio is 1.15:1, which is less than the industry average of 1.60:1, however to give a better sense of where this stands in the industry, as seen in exhibit 3, it is actually less than the average of the bottom 25% of the industry. The quick ratio is 0.61 is less than the industry is 0.90. Both these ratios serve to point out the lack of cash in this company. The cash flow has been decreasing because, it takes longer to get the money from customers, but the company still needs to pay for its purchases. Also, the company couldn’t go over the $400,000 loan limit, so they were forced to stretch their cash.
The stock price is currently 103.31, down from a recent high of 121.50. The P/E ratio is declining at 28 and beta at .67, which is expected to grow closer to 1.0. A recent earnings surprise last December yielded a 15% difference from the lower expectations and the latest earnings reports late last month also surprised investors. Estimates for the 2000 fiscal year are being raised by a large majority of analyst who believe that earnings per share will increase and the stock price will reach close to 150.
Current Ratio – For the last three years was growing from 3.56 in 2001 to 3.81 in 2002 to 4.22 in 2003. The reason of grow is increased in Assets. Even though Liability was growing, Asset grow was more significant.
In Microsoft’s 2004 fiscal year, a 33% increase in net income resulted in a 1% increase in stock price. In the 2005 fiscal year, a 2% gain in net income resulted in a 4% decrease in stock price (Microsoft Inc 2006). As seen, an increase in net income does not automatically lead to an increase in stock price. For growth companies such as Microsoft, stock price is primarily driven by the growth of earnings (25 April 2007).
At the end of the useful life of fixed assets the businesses will dispose, and any amount received from disposal will represent its residual value. This may be difficult to estimate in practice. How ever, an estimate has to be made. If it is unlikely to be significant amount, a residual value of zero will be assumed. The cost of fixed assets less its estimated residual value represents the total amount to be depreciated over its estimated useful life.
The main contributing factor to the decline in the return on stockholders’ equity (25.37% to 8.73%) was the decline in the profit margin (11.79% vs. 5.08%). The decrease in asset turnover (1.11 to 1.00) made a small contribution to the decline, as did the decline in the debt ratio (48.4% to 41.8%).
Kodak’s debt ratio has been improving since 2012 when it was considerably above 1. Their 2014 debt ratio is 0.89, which is very close to Hewlett-Packard and Sony. The debt-to-equity ratio of Kodak is the first signal within the ratios that the company is not performing well. Generally, this ratio should be below 1 and for Kodak in 2014 it was 8.83. Their equity is almost non-existent and this is signaling very weak balance sheet strength. Compared to Kodak, Hewlett-Packard and Sony are doing okay, but their ratios are both well above 1. In terms of ability to pay interest, Kodak’s only strong year was 2013. Their ratio has dipped in 2014, showing that they aren’t able to pay their interest or are struggling to pay it. Hewlett-Packard had no interest expense in their latest fiscal year and Sony’s ratio is very strong. In 2012, Kodak’s free cash flow was in the negatives (-$1,176,000). Surprisingly, it reached over two million in 2013, but then dropped to only $33,000 in 2014. Without sufficient cash flow, Kodak is going to have a difficult time increasing their shareholder value. Hewlett-Packard has free cash flow over five million dollars which is huge compared to Kodak. Kodak does not seem to have sufficient cash to handle their business obligations. The cash flow adequacy ratio should be above 1, but Kodak’s are negative. The competitors are around 0.5 for their cash flow adequacy ratio, which
The receivables turnover is based on the assumption that all sales are credit sales. The values of receivables turnover for 2004 and 2005 are 10.21 times and 8.83 times, respectively. This means that IQ’s efficiency is considerably declining in terms of cash collection. The decrease in receivables turnover is explained by the higher increase in average net receivables (71%) than the increase in net credit sales (25%).
Xerox's "Book In Time" is a revolutionary product, presenting some new opportunities for the company. It is simply a matter of costs. The Book-in-Time equipment allows for a publishing company to produce a 300-page book for $6.90, something which could have been previously reached only for lots larger than 1,000 copies. A significant decrease in publishing costs, given the fact that these cover up to 20 % (including the paper and binding the book), would create the possibility of an increased profit margin.
As a multinational, Xerox specializes in technology and services and operates under two different market environments, the macro and microenvironment. In the microenvironment, the company has influence while in the macro-environment the company cannot make market changes.
The basic earnings per ordinary share in 2016 is RM19.14 and RM14.30 in 2015. This shows that the ordinary share had been increased RM4.84 compare to 2016 based on 2015. In the other hand, this company had declared a first interim single-tier dividend of 10 sen per ordinary share amounting to RM22.88 million in respect of the financial year ended 31 December 2016. They sold their ordinary shares of RM400,000,000 units of RM0.50 per each in 2016 and RM200,000,000 units of RM0.50 per each in 2015 to their shareholders. It is increased from 2015 to 2016 with 200,000,000 units. The other investments that available for sale is RM1000 same as in 2015 and 2016.
“For example, if the organisation decide to expand, fixed costs will definitely increase. Sometimes, organisations decide to reduce certain fixed costs to improve their cash flow, by moving to a less expensive workplace or reducing the number of employees”.