Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does socio economic status impact on health
Effects of poverty on health
How your socio-economic status can affect your access to healthcare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How does socio economic status impact on health
Education and the Great Divide
Education has become such a common commodity in America that people have forgotten how important it truly is. Important to the point that it might be the difference between living a long and happy life, and living a terribly short one. The problem is that schooling isn’t as evenly spread-out as people would like to believe. There is a clear divide in the level of education that people receive between people of small rural towns and big urban cities. The divide doesn’t just end at schooling though, the level of schooling has a clear correlation with life expectancy; higher levels of education lead to longer lives lived. Education is what teaches people the health benefits from eating a salad instead of a juicy
…show more content…
Big Mac, shows how to budget to inch out every last dollar until the next paycheck, and screams at people the importance of washing their hands and getting regular check-ups. In the essay “What’s Killing Poor White Women” written by Monica Potts, she writes about the many dangers that poverty-stricken white women face.
The main purpose of the article is to show that the poor white women of rural towns deal with a multitude of difficulties which could lead to the steep decline if their life expectancy, and the majority of them stem from the lack of education the they receive. The primary support for her article comes from the personal account of Crystal Wilson and her family (a poorly educated family in rural Arkansas). Potts makes her statement clear with a concluding quote from the technology coordinator for the Cave City schools, Julie Johnson: “… I don’t know anything about anything, but that’s what kills them” (Potts …show more content…
609). The shortcomings in hours alive begins with nutrition. The impoverished are unable to get the education they need to even apply to the majority of jobs out there, so they have little to no income and mostly have to live off of government checks or food stamps. Having very little to spend generally means that they have to eat food that’s less than desirable when it comes to nutrition because it’s what they can afford. Looking at it from a commercial stand point, nutrition just costs more. To grow things fresh and without pesticides or anything takes more time which costs more labor. Whereas feeding a long row of cow’s cheap scraps, and freezing the burgers they later turn into is far cheaper, and can be done on a much larger scale. This leaves the poor to be forced to choose between whether they want to eat healthy foods and starve half of the time, or eat terrible foods and always have enough to eat. That is if they even know about the nutritional values of the foods they eat.
With an educational background of high school or less it is very likely to not know what “nutrition” even means. Not having an understanding of nutrition and how the things one eats matters leads to a variety of complications by itself. The most common disease it generally leads to is diabetes; the ever-growing plague of America. Diseases like this are even worse in the uneducated than in the average population because of the severe lack of understanding. The poor lack the understanding needed to communicate with their physicians about any problems, and fail to know the severity of their disease. Without knowing how severe their disease is they may choose to ignore it and hope it somehow goes away, or just choose not to go about fixing their lifestyle to survive it. For example, if someone suddenly found out that they had diabetes due to their lackluster diet; the educated and uneducated may behave drastically differently. The wealthy would have been educated about how severe diseases of this nature can be and how easily they can ultimately lead to death. With that knowledge, they would inevitably change their diet, and fight their way through it all until their body was in a better place and could slowly go back to normal. Those in poverty however, might assume that because they’re not in pain they are perfectly healthy. Diseases below the surface don’t work that way though, and the inflicted
would slowly eat their way to death with a smile on their face. Lifestyle diseases aren’t even the top of the list when it comes to sickness and the poverty sadly. At least those are generally slow; the real killers are viruses and germ-related sicknesses. A clear example of how prevalent and important teaching the importance of hygiene is a study done at Auburn University on Hand Hygiene. The study found that the average percent of people that wash their hands after the restroom is as low as 60% (Taylor et. al. 1). Furthermore, the study found that the people that choose not to wash their hands claim to be sick more often than those that do (1). A statistic so low for the average population has drastic consequences for those in poverty. Without the education to know that washing hands is necessary, it can be assumed that these people would have a far lesser statistic, but even if it was as high as 60% they would still be in trouble. The average population has the means to get help if they get the flu or any other viral disease, whereas the poor don’t have such luxuries. Many times, they have to simply “tough it out” and hope they get better. Basically, the less fortunate have less knowledge about diseases and how important hand washing, and hygiene in general is. That leaves them far more susceptible to disease, and vastly more likely to become ill, serious or otherwise. With a higher likelihood of sickness, they need medical attention more than most, but that only makes things worse. Chances are, a child in poverty grows up rarely getting any check-ups or doctor visits. They rarely get check-ups because that is just another cost that is difficult to pay for when money is always tight. Ignoring regular check-ups just by itself leaves them far greater chance to not catch any difficult diseases until it’s too late. It gets worse though, without regular check-ups they grow up with the idea that going to the doctor isn’t all that necessary, so they’re more likely to end up deciding to tough things out whenever they do end up getting sick, and again are more likely to wait until things are simply too late. Knowing what to do health-wise still wouldn’t save all in poverty though. A big part of becoming impoverished is an inability to manage money and make sure that it lasts. Being bad with money is a tumorous factor in families in that it snowballs from parent to child. If a person is unable to manage their money then he/she will end up taking away chances for their future children. One of these chances (of course) is education, and taking that away leaves them with a very shaky foundation in controlling inhibitions and working with numbers. Both of which are essential for working out a monthly budget. Without the know-how to budget money the cycle continues with future generations and just keeps repeating itself. A lot of this could be solved just by getting a job with a decent salary. In the current state of things that is nearly impossible without the proper education though. Almost every job now requires at least a high school degree, and a decent majority of those require a bachelor’s degree. Employers require more and more education as time goes on, so the destitute are having an increasingly hard time finding work. Without being able to find a job they are left with no opportunities to climb their way out. Rather they are forced to accept where they are and just deal with it until they meet their end. All of these problems can be solved with the addition of further education. When a person chooses to forgo the free high school education offered to them, they are indirectly saying that they want to die sooner because “school sucks.” If taken to a broader scope, adding in those without college level education, statistics seem to be more dire. There would be approximately “200,000 fewer premature deaths would occur in people aged 30 and above each year if everyone had the same death rate as those with [college level] degrees” (Steingrı´msdo´ttir et. al. 1). If the importance of a college level degree can be as high as 200,000 deaths then one can only imagine the pertinence of getting at least a high school degree. Education is the foundation to a vast array of articles of life, and is too essential to life expectancy to take any less than available.
It’s considered a rarity now days to walk down a major city street and not come across a single person who is fighting to survive poverty. The constant question is why don’t they go get help, or what did they do to become like this? The question that should be asked is how will America fix this? Over the past year, Americans who completed high school earned fifteen point five percent more per hour than that of dropouts (Bernstein, Is Education the Cure to Poverty). According to Jared Bernstein, in his article “Is Education the Cure to Poverty”, he argues that not only do the poor need to receive a higher education, but to also maximize their skill levels to fill in where work is needed (Is Education the Cure to Poverty). Counter to Bernstein’s argument Robert Reich expresses that instead of attempting to achieve a higher education, high school seniors need to find another way into the American middle class. Reich goes on to say “the emerging economy will need platoons of technicians able to install, service, and repair all the high-tech machinery filling up hospitals, offices, and factories” (Reich, Why College Isn’t (and Shouldn’t Have to be) for Everyone). Danielle Paquette, though, offers an alternative view on higher education. Paquette gives view that it doesn’t matter on the person, rather it’s the type of school and amount of time in school that will determine a person’s
people agree with the state that Liz borrows from Thomas Jefferson, "Everybody should have an education proportional to their life,"(Addison 256). Unfortunately, the average income between rich and poor in America is not accurate, everyone supposed to become somebody in life; college gives opportunity to everyone who wants to do so, to become whatever they want, and at any age with a low cost. as much as the income level between rich and poor in America stays unbalanced; college will always be there to gives opportunity to people who want to learn, but cannot afford to attend university. Liz Addison points out an example in the article.
Patricia Hyjer Dyk talks about poverty and how it complicates the family life. On the other hand, Stephanie Coontz focuses on how families have changed from the 20th century to the 21st century; focusing on the negative and positive aspects of both. Dyke doesn’t talk much about how the family system and the earning system has changed, while Coontz focuses on that; however, in both the authors’ articles, women and their role in the society are significantly covered.
Former senior associate editor of The Atlantic, Matthew O’Brien, in his article, Poverty is Literally Making People Sick Because They Can’t Afford Food, claims that people of low income are more likely to become hospitalized for hypoglycemia at the end of the month. O’Brien’s purpose is to convey the idea that people of the lower class are struggling to pay for their own food at the end of the month and that could lead to severe health issues. He employs techniques within his article such as having a stern tone, using passionate word choice, and a concrete research study in order to evoke emotions of sorrow from his general audience especially those in the upper and middle class.
Although the two authors do not refer to each other directly in their works, both their perspectives share a common ground that no enough income make people eating less healthy. Pinsker argues that the actual barrier that stops people from eating healthy is the lack of income (129-130). He uses studies to show that poor families choose processed food because children like those tasty processed food (Pinsker 129-134). Whereas poor families cannot afford the waste if children refused to eat healthier but less tasty food parents provided (Pinsker 129-134). Cortright also suggests that income matters the most to why people do not eat healthy. He even further discusses income as the most influential limiting factor by addressing that other factors such as physical proximity to local food sources do not cause people to eat less healthy (Cortright 135-138). The two authors, in general, reach a consensus and mutually prove that income plays as the biggest limiting factor for people to have healthy
As much as adolescents complain about education, we would be crippled without it. The immense freedom we have in America to learn whatever we want is something we should not take for granted. People in other countries fight to learn and to educate themselves as best as they can. People in America just 50 years ago had to fight to learn. Could you imagine living in a world where you couldn’t learn? People all over the world fight for that, because it’s scary to live in a world where you can’t do the simple task of reading or writing. What if you couldn’t read the label on a bottle of bleach? Could you imagine the damage that could cause you, simply because you couldn’t read? We have so much knowledge at our fingertips; museums, libraries, public
A high school education is no longer sufficient to succeed in America’s increasingly complex economy. However, because of the high price point of a college education, far too many Americans are unable to afford education beyond high school. As shown in the graph below, the higher level of education received greatly increases the chances for employment and also dramatically increases the average salary potential of an individual.
Education has always been in existence in one form or another. As each child is born into this world regardless of who or where they are born, life lessons immediately begin. He/she will learn to crawl, walk, and talk by the example and encouragement of others. Although these lessons are basic in the beginning they evolve as the child grows. However, the core learning method of a child does not change. Learning from others, they will watch, listen, and then act for themselves. Thomas Jefferson believed that an education would lead men and women to the ability to be self-governed and become positive contributors to society (Mondale & Patton, 2001). Today, we can see how true this is by the examples of others. Those that are given the opportunity for education are more likely to find jobs and develop skills that not only improve a community, but influence the economic growth of their nation (Ravitch, Cortese, West, Carmichael, Andere, & Munson, 2009, p. 13). On the other hand, if an education is not provided to individuals, they can become a hindrance to that nation’s growth.
Throughout the years, America has always debated whether education is needed- if it helps people succeed or not. The argument in the past was always over high school education, which is now mandatory. That decision has helped the US rise economically and industrially. Today, the US is in the middle of the same debate- this time, over college. Some, like David Leonhardt, a columnist for the business section of The New York Times, think a college education creates success in any job. Others, such as Christopher Beha, an author and assistant editor of Harper’s Magazine, believe that some college “education” (like that of for-profit schools) is a waste of time, and can even be harmful to students. Each stance on this argument has truth to it, and there is no simple answer to this rising issue in an ever changing nation full of unique people. Any final decision would affect the United States in all factions- especially economically and socially. However, despite the many arguments against college, there is overwhelming proof that college is good for all students, academically or not.
How to get a better life in the future? Literally to get a better life one has to get through education. This process takes about sixteen years to complete, but when someone joins this process they have to follow the U.S. education system. Education in the United States has been following one idea that comes from a foreign region “The Prussians”. It has been evolving over the years and it has remained adjoining new ideas. Some of these new ideas involve many circumstances which have changed the concept of education. In “Entitlement Education” Daniel Bruno suggests that education has been overall cheating students, and that it is competitive to graduate and to get a job; also, in “What is Education?,” Petra Pepellashi states that education would have been better with Thomas Jefferson’s model of critical thinking rather than the Prussian model way of respecting authority. Above all, education remains competitive, and it continues cheating students because of the usage of the Prussian model rather than Thomas Jefferson’s vision.
has become the norm for them because of their living conditions. They may not be able to afford medical care, and it is possible that they are not well educated, so they do not understand the severity of leaving a medical condition untreated. For these reason they may never seek medical attention. In contrast, someone who is of a higher class will be better educated on what to do when they feel ill. They will most likely seek medical help right away, because to them illness is not the norm. They can also afford private medical care if needs be.
The greatest woman I’ve ever known always told me that education was important…and she was right. I came from a small town in the suburbs of St. Louis, Missouri prior to becoming a teenager. At the time, education was abundant in St. Ann, where I lived. I attended a decent elementary school and made good grades, despite mathematics not being my cup of tea. I have
Those who are at the bottom 20 percent don’t have access to things like health care and proper education. Health care is a major issue in most cities in America. While watching the movie “Poor America” there was a scene when the people making the movie decided to film outside a center where doctors and dentists would be performing free services. The line was extremely long and people would be camped outside just so they could see a doctor. Many people who were there had serious injuries and sicknesses and hadn’t seen a doctor or a dentist in a very long time. One gentleman in particular was so sick that the doctors strongly suggested he go to the emergency room, that his sickens could be fatal. However at the end the gentlemen refused to go to the emergency because the medical bill would be extremely
Not everyone is born into a life of the rich and glamorous. Those who are fortunate enough know that they are very lucky to be in their position. Others however are totally in different situations. They need to fend for themselves and having meal is something which comes only once a day. Malnutrition is the obvious result of not consuming the right amount of food. This therefore will lead to outbreaks of diseases but in poverty stricken countries there are no hospitals to cure this. Lacking infrastructure means lacking educational rights. People who are living in poverty can not afford to send their children to school so this will mean an unclear future for their children. Furthermore, living in crowded areas, this has a tendency to increase the chances of disease as people are drinking from unsafe sources of water. People around the world are not aware of how immense this issue is and sometimes hesitant to believe the scale that it has risen to. Without understanding for people living disadvantage from the rest then there is no cure for the problem.
Although education can be expensive, an affordable education makes better citizens. In fact, most people believe that going to college improves the chance of finding a great job, but the effect on society is often not considered. Seeking a higher education, often seems too expensive and the paperwork too complex, therefore many people do not consider attending. In the article “Here’s your Crisis: Student Loan Debt Isn’t a Myth”, Chris Lewis and Layla Zaidane commented “it 's an affordability crisis”(). As our nation ages, education must become more affordable for all because with educated citizens our country becomes financially sound, our citizens become more knowledgeable and their communication skills are better developed.