More handpicked essays just for you.
Frederick douglass speech rethorical
Essay on frederick douglass life
Frederick Douglass influences in the 1800s
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Frederick Douglass’s speech, "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July," he sought not only to convince people of the wrongfulness of slavery, but also to make abolition more acceptable to Northern whites (Engell, n.d.). Although the first part of his speech gives recognition to the founding fathers and what they did for this country, it soon evolves into a condemnation of the attitude of American society toward slavery (Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, n.d.). Furthermore, he sought to change people’s minds about the abilities and intelligence of African Americans. He does this through an impressive display of liberal learning. Douglass’s speech consists of many different components, but what I found to be most interesting is …show more content…
his theme of American democracy and freedom. American ideology is inconsistent because while it professes freedom, it does not give all people that right; it advocates democracy in Europe and elsewhere, but it does not grant it to all of its own people. Douglass, being a former slave, takes on that personae throughout his speech.
He makes this known in the very beginning by stating, “The fact is, ladies and gentlemen, the distance between this platform and the slave plantation, from which I escaped, is considerable – and the difficulties to be overcome in getting from the latter to the former, are by no means slight.” This represents the pure astonishment he feels by even being present on that day. Taking on this personae he can better represent the African American slaves and the lack of freedom that they face because he had once faced it too. This projects a serious tone for the rest of the speech. Moreover, it sets a genuine tone because this is not only something he is advocating for, but it is something that he has also endured. Speaking to a predominately white audience, the subject of Douglass’s speech is American slavery. The discourse that arises from that is inconsistencies with American ideology. He sets up his argument for the freedom of slaves by touching on the history of the American Revolutionaries’ fight for freedom against their legal bondage under the British crown. He then goes on to tell the audience that he supports the actions of these revolutionaries, setting up the structure for his …show more content…
discourse. In my argument I stated that this American ideology is flawed because while it professes freedom, it does not give all people that right.
This discourse that is found throughout Douglass’s speech is represented in many different areas. He further justifies this discourse by introducing the American slave-trade, sustained by American politics and American religion. How men are examined like horses and the women rudely and brutally exposed to the shocking gaze of American slave-buyers. This illustrates the terrible reality that many African Americans face. Douglass engages the audience by then asking rhetorical questions. The fact that he is speaking the day after the Fourth of July, a day that American’s celebrate their independence, yet slaves are not independent nor free, is scorching irony. For these slaves, it does not represent independence, it represents the gross injustice and cruelty to which they are a constant victim to. For these slaves, this so called “freedom” that is a part of the American ideology is nothing but a mere
prison. In the next part of my argument I claim that the American ideology advocates democracy in Europe and elsewhere, but it does not grant it to all of its own people. This is demonstrated throughout Douglass’s speech. He makes the connection to other countries, how they no longer allow slavery because how can they advocate freedom of men when there is slavery. He addresses his audience by using “you,” giving them a sense that he is addressing them individually rather as a whole. In a democracy citizens have a voice, a vote in political decisions and who their leader is. However, this is not the case for African American slaves. He addresses this to his audience by stating, “Your President, your Secretary of State, your lords, nobles, and ecciesiastics, enforce, as a duty you owe to your free and glorious country, and to your God, that you do this accused thing.” This accused thing of hunting down and capturing men in chains, consigning them to slavery and excruciating torture. How then is democracy granted to these African American’s when they have no voice, when their own President advocates this hellish sport? By providing context behind his claims he is demonstrating to his white audience that they are the ones with a voice, they are the ones being called upon to do this accused thing. Ultimately, it is up to them in this democracy to change the future of this young nation. Furthermore, the many dimensions of Douglass’s speech, "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July," opens up the doors for many critical interpretations. To reiterate what I found to be most interesting is his theme of American democracy and freedom. My argument is that American ideology is inconsistent because while it professes freedom, it does not give all people that right; it advocates democracy in Europe and elsewhere, but it does not grant it to all of its own people. Throughout my descriptive analysis I sought to back up my claims by describing and analyzing certain aspects of the text.
Frederick Douglass’s speech was given to so many of his own people. The fact that Douglass speaks so harshly to them proves that he has passion for what he talks about through-out. “What to the slave is the Fourth of July”, compares and contrasts the different meanings the Fourth of July shared between Whites and African Americans. Douglass says “What, to the American slave, is your 4th of July? I answer: a day that reveals to him, more than all other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim”. Frederick Douglass was not striving for the attention, he just wanted to get across that the Fourth of July is not a day of celebration to African Americans and the respect he shared with them, having once being a slave himself.
1.) Fredrick Douglass’s purpose in this speech was to explain the wrongfulness of slavery in America. Fredrick Douglass states in his speech “Are the great principles of natural justice, embodied in that Declaration of Independence, extended to us?” and “The rich inheritance of justice, liberty, prosperity, and independence, bequeathed by your fathers is shared by you, not by me.” These prove that the freedom and independence Americans have aren’t shared with the Africans when it should be that Africans have those rights as well. Frederick Douglass then talked about how badly whites treat blacks and how wrong it is. “There are 72 crimes in Virginia which, if committed by a black man, subject him to a punishment of death, while
In sum, all of these key arguments exist in “The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass” because of the institution of slavery and its resulting lack of freedom that was used to defend it. This text’s arguments could all be gathered together under the common element of inequality and how it affected the practical, social, and even spiritual lives of the slaves.
The “Fourth of July Oration” and the gathering that Douglass was attending was constructed to serve an early ceremony for Independence Day. He begins his speech with the subject of America’s independence. Specifics of the nation such as the memories of the Revolution, the model of freedom for all individuals, and religious support were spoken about. Frederick shares his experiences as a child. He believed that the American slave-trade was a horrific event that became real for a majority of individuals. When young, Douglass witnessed the disgust that all slaves had to experience, “my soul was often pierced…” (p. 267) He would watch the slave ships being anchored, ones that held innocent individuals. It was difficult and absolutely absurd for anybody to watch such torture take place and not be able to do a single thing ...
In, “The Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass”, readers get a first person perspective on slavery in the South before the Civil War. The author, Frederick Douglass, taught himself how to read and write, and was able to share his story to show the evils of slavery, not only in regard to the slaves, but with regard to masters, as well. Throughout Douglass’ autobiography, he shares his disgust with how slavery would corrupt people and change their whole entire persona. He uses ethos, logos, and pathos to help establish his credibility, and enlighten his readers about what changes needed to be made.
His main argument in the speech is that it 's unjust and hypocritical for a country to celebrate its freedom while it still has slaves. Now that in itself is a morally viable argument, and it has never been more relevant than today in our racially hate fueled world where every situation is turned into a hate crime. However, back in those days majority of slaves were sold into slavery by their own people. Most slaves were sold by rival tribes as prisoners of war, or trouble makers of the tribe, thus giving us the “bottom of the barrel” of the groups. Another counter to Douglass was that even though slaves were people, they were still considered property. A hard working farmer could have used his last penny in order to purchase that slave because he was unable to tend his farm and provide for his family. One common misconception was that all slaves were beaten and treated lower than swine, while to the contrary some were treated well being given a bed and meals every day in exchange for their hard work. While Douglass may have had a bad time under the ownership of Auld, most northern states did not treat their slaves in this manner. This is one of the main reasons Douglass learned how to read, yet no credit is given to his former owner. Most slaves developed a relationship with their owners, in which their owners taught them useful skills such as reading, writing, simple math and farming skills. Another argument brought into Douglass’ speech was that most churches were segregated, and in turn perpetuated the racism that helped keep slavery alive in well. He proposed that a God that wouldn’t allow such evil and disservice in this world would contradict everything the bible proposes and teaches. He praises the writers of the constitution, considering them his equal and thanking the signers of the Declaration of Independence, calling
In his speech he tries to make white people consider the behavior of black people. Specially their feelings towards a national occasion such as Independence Day. At the time of Douglass’s speech America were actually two different nations, white and black. Two separated nations one had great benefits
In the passage of the Narrative of Fredrick Douglass, the author masterfully conveys two complimentary tones of liberation and fear. The tones transition by the use of diction and detail. The passage is written entirely in first person, since we are witnessing the struggles of Fredrick Douglass through his eyes. Through his diction, we are able to feel the triumph that comes with freedom along with the hardships. Similarly, detail brings a picturesque view of his adversities. Since the point of view is first person, the reader is able to be a part of the Douglass’ struggles with his new freedom. With diction, detail, and point of view, the reader is able to get a rare glimpse into the past of Fredrick Douglass.Fredrick Douglass’ diction is powerful as he describes his life as a slave and with his new freedom. Fredrick Douglass calls being enslaved an act of “wretchedness,” yet he was able to remain “firm” and eventually left the “chains” of slavery. Fredrick Douglass expresses that being enslaved is a wretched act and that no man should ever deserve such treatment. Despite being a slave, he kept strong and eventually broke the chain of society. However, Fredrick Douglass experienced great “insecurity” and “loneliness” with his new freedom, and was upon a new “hunting-ground.” His new freedom brought other devastating factors, being a new state without any friends, which caused his loneliness. In this new state, he grew insecure for he was in a new danger zone where at any time his freedom could be rejected. With new freedom come new obstacles, which are described in the diction of Fredrick Douglass.
On July 5th of 1852, the Ladies Antislavery Society of Rochester requested that emancipated slave, Fredrick Douglass, speak for their celebration of the United States’ national independence. Douglass accepted this request and presented a powerful speech that explained and argued his true beliefs and feelings concerning this event. He considered their decision to request him as a speaker on that day to be a mockery of his past and of the ongoing status of blacks as slaves in America at the time. Nevertheless, Douglass skillfully constructed his speech utilizing various methods that forced his audience to take him seriously and think twice about the issue of slavery in America. His passion about the subject, his ability to captivate his audience, and his persuasive skills combine to form a clearly effective speech that continues to be studied to this day. Douglass warmed up his audience by commending the moral and patriotic excellence of their forefathers. He then delivered the argument of his speech which cleverly criticized the hypocrisy of the institution of slavery and those who tolerated or supported it. Yet, to conclude his speech, Douglass asserts that there is still hope for the young nation so as not to leave the audience completely discouraged. The way in which Douglass constructed and delivered this speech had a lasting impact and left his audience with an effectively argued point to consider.
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave, brings to light many of the social injustices that colored men, women, and children all were forced to endure throughout the nineteenth century under Southern slavery laws. Douglass's life-story is presented in a way that creates a compelling argument against the justification of slavery. His argument is reinforced though a variety of anecdotes, many of which detailed strikingly bloody, horrific scenes and inhumane cruelty on the part of the slaveholders. Yet, while Douglas’s narrative describes in vivid detail his experiences of life as a slave, what Douglass intends for his readers to grasp after reading his narrative is something much more profound. Aside from all the physical burdens of slavery that he faced on a daily basis, it was the psychological effects that caused him the greatest amount of detriment during his twenty-year enslavement. In the same regard, Douglass is able to profess that it was not only the slaves who incurred the damaging effects of slavery, but also the slaveholders. Slavery, in essence, is a destructive force that collectively corrupts the minds of slaveholders and weakens slaves’ intellects.
The reader is first introduced to the idea of Douglass’s formation of identity outside the constraints of slavery before he or she even begins reading the narrative. By viewing the title page and reading the words “The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave, written by himself” the reader sees the advancement Douglass made from a dependent slave to an independent author (Stone 134). As a slave, he was forbidden a voice with which he might speak out against slavery. Furthermore, the traditional roles of slavery would have had him uneducated—unable to read and incapable of writing. However, by examining the full meaning of the title page, the reader is introduced to Douglass’s refusal to adhere to the slave role of uneducated and voiceless. Thus, even before reading the work, the reader knows that Douglass will show “how a slave was made a man” through “speaking out—the symbolic act of self-definition” (Stone 135).
Douglass spoke in support that if African American’s join to defeat the confederacy, they would be treated equal and slavery would be no more. Fredrick Douglass knew Aristotle’s Rhetoric well and, specifically, deliberative rhetoric which he applied (the three rhetorical appeals—ethos, pathos and logos) in not only writing about his own Life (The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave) but his speech as well. He employs these rhetorical devices in his 1863 speech, “Men of Color, To Arms.” The goal of deliberative writing is to persuade your audience of the truth you say and more importantly, of the benefit of your truth. Douglass empowers the people in his speech by directly noting that the advancement of racial equality will only benefit from us going to war. The use of Rhetoric was very beneficial to Douglass speech. Frederick Douglass employed them this way in “Men of Color, To Arms.” First, the use of pathos. Douglass shows the success that can come out of this and he reads to the states that he is succeeded. This gives the audience motivation to overcome the power that others had on them. The emotional aspects of the speech concurred with a ton of
In the speech, “what to the slave is the Fourth of July?” which Fredrick Douglass gave he emphasized how the fourth of July is not a celebration to the slaves but an insult and ridicule. Douglass uses logos and pathos to make the audience understand his point of view and how this so called “independence day’’ is for whites only because the black people in America are still slaves , which in turn means they can’t celebrate this day. Using these rhetoric’s he conveys his point on how this day is adds insult to injury.
As both the narrator and author of “Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass: An American Slave, Written by Himself” Frederick Douglass writes about his transition from a slave to a well educated and empowered colored young man. As a skilled and spirited man, he served as both an orator and writer for the abolitionist movement, which was a movement to the abolishment of slavery. At the time of his narrative’s publication, Douglass’s sole goal of his writings was to essentially prove to those in disbelief that an articulate and intelligent man, such as himself, could have,in fact, been enslaved at one point in time. While, Douglass’ narrative was and arguably still is very influential, there are some controversial aspects of of this piece, of which Deborah McDowell mentions in her criticism.
Throughout the entirety of the book, Douglass presents himself as a neutral figure who can see both the negative and positive side of any issue, even slavery. He presents a rational account of why slavery exists and does so without attempting to discuss the morality of the topic at hand. Despite spending a lot of time discussing the cruel masters and supervisors he encountered in life , his anger is not towards those who support slavery, but the institution of slavery as a whole.“Nature has done almost nothing to prepare me...