Analysis Of W. D. Ross Ideas Of How We Should Act

1178 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ethical theories quizlet

W.D. Ross’ Ideas of How We Should Act
Part I
William David Ross was a Scottish philosopher, born in the late 1800s. He studied at the University of Edinburgh, and then at Balliol College in Oxford, England. Ross held some different views from other philosophers in that he was a moral realist. He thought that there were moral truths in the world, just as black and white as mathematics. He differed from the consequentialist’s thinking that - you do what brings the most good; by saying that choosing your actions to produce the most good was only one of several prima facie duties. (a) Prima facie duties were obligations which he outlined which should determine a person’s actions in most situations.
(b) Prima facie means, “at first sight” in Latin, and W.D. Ross came up with duties that were binding if all other things were equal. The prima facie duties that Ross presented were:
1. Fidelity – he believed that one should keep their promises and contracts, and should not deceive others. This would include lies and deceit.
2. Reparation – this duty would have to do with making up for injuries done to others. This means that if you have wronged someone else, you have the duty to repair the wrong.
3. Gratitude – you need to be grateful for good deeds done to you, and if possible pass those good deeds on to others.
4. Non-injury – this requires a person to avoid injury of another person physically or psychologically. This includes not harming their happiness, security, or health, and even includes their character (in such cases today we say that libel can be a crime, because it hurts someone’s character). Along with avoiding intentionally harming others, this also includes injury resulting in negligence or ignorance. In ignorance,...

... middle of paper ...

...her or more damaging weapons, thus in an odd way fulfilling the beneficence prima facie duty by not hurting more people. He would also be improving himself, by working in a field that could help him find a better job, and he would be helping his family by providing financial support for his wife and children. Hopefully the research he did would never be used, and so he would not be violating his duty to not harm others.
Ross’ prima facie duties are a good guideline, but not all moral decisions are as clear as an obligatory rule. In life we are faced with many decisions that have a positive and negative, and we must be able to make judgments that we can truly say that we did the right thing. Sometimes we do not know all of the ramifications of our actions, but hopefully we act in a way that we are truly able to be at peace and know that we did the right thing.

Show More
Related

  • Returning The Gift By Kimmerer Summary

    662 Words  | 2 Pages

    Gratitude is a gift that the earth urgently needs. Consistent gratitude is a form of recognition of the gift and the giver. Daily gratitude can help eliminate the need for more and practicing more of only what we need. Gratitude leads to a society of contentment rather than one that's always in need of more. We human individuals have conventions for appreciation; we apply them formally to each other. We say thank you. “We understand that receiving a gift

    Read More

  • Herb Nabigon's The Hollow Tree

    597 Words  | 2 Pages

    life, and acting upon his responsibilities in order to follow with his heart, instead of with

    Read More

  • Objections to Rossian Pluralism Make It a More Valuable Moral Theory

    1131 Words  | 3 Pages

    The prima facie duties that William David Ross has listed include duties of fidelity, reparation, gratitude, justice, beneficence, self-improvement, and non-maleficence. Duties of fidelity and reparation rest on previous acts that one has performed, and acting on these duties are acts such as promise-keeping (duties of fidelity) and making amends for previous wrongful acts (duties of reparation), while duties of gratitude rest on previous acts that others have performed. There is a duty associated with the distribution of pleasure or good regardless of its recipient, and this is termed as duties of justice. An additional duty rests on the mere fact that there are other beings in this world to whom we can be of assistance to: duties of beneficence. Duties of self-improvement claim that there are intrinsic moral reasons for one to improve oneself and finally, duties of non-maleficence states that there are intrinsic moral reasons to not harm others. Duties are placed on the list only when they have been judged to be basic moral reaso...

    Read More

  • Peter Singer's Essay 'Affluence, And Morality'

    1343 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the paper “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”  Peter Singer defends the idea that is our moral duty to help others in need. Since there are other people in the world that are suffering and we our in a position to give, we are obligated to help create change in the world . In this paper I will explain Peter Singer’s view about how it is our moral duty to help those who are suffering in the world. Then I will present an implication of Peter Singer claim that implies how we are obligated to give upon to others that are suffering. I will then explain an argurment to provide a reason of why someone should support Peter Singer principle. Carried to a logical conclusion, Peter Singer aruement that his principle is clearly obligatory than superagory. I will consider the two actions that Peter Singer gives to distinguish duty versues chariy and argue that his principle should e consider a superagoty action. Since his

    Read More

  • Sally's Prescriptive Moral Theory

    1421 Words  | 3 Pages

    Sally’s prescriptive moral theory combines two separate and unrelated principles to create an all-encompassing moral theory that can be followed by moral agents at all times. The first is rooted in consequentialism and is as follows: 1. Moral agents should cause moral pain or suffering only when the pain or suffering is justified by a moral consideration that is more important than the pain or suffering caused. The second is an autonomous theory, where other’s autonomy must be respected, it is 2. Moral agents should respect the autonomy of moral agents.

    Read More

  • Gratitude And Gratitude

    1756 Words  | 4 Pages

    Its practice has been seen to be efficacious in healing and improving the quality of life of many people. Whether in terms of enhancing mental health or preventing illness, gratitude is one of life’s vitalizing ingredients. Clinical trials indicate that the practice of gratitude can have dramatic and lasting positive effects on a person’s life. It can lower blood pressure, improve immune function, promote happiness and well being, and spur acts of helpfulness, generosity and cooperation (Emmons & Stern, 2013). Emmons and Stern (2013) from their experiments, assert that gratitude has one of the strongest links to mental health and life satisfaction in any personality trait, more so than even optimism hope or compassion. They maintain that people who experience gratitude can cope more effectively with everyday stress, show increased resilience in the face of trauma-induced stress, recover more quickly from illness, and enjoy more robust physical health.

    Read More

  • The True American Hero

    1333 Words  | 3 Pages

    He could not understand why a man should be dishonest, for to him honesty always seemed the best policy. His modesty taught him self-control, and his sense of duty was exceeded only by his duty towards his country. Self-control leads to self-respect, to dignity without arrogance, to pride without vulgarity, to ambition without selfishness, and Grant possessed all these many virtues to the highest degree.

    Read More

  • Bioethics

    1241 Words  | 3 Pages

    To not cause harm to someone can take on many different meanings. It can constitute physical harm or mental harm. Physical harm would obviously mean that whoever is treating the patient to not cause actual physical harm for no reason. Mentally might mean not telling the patient the truth about their illness. Some believe that a little white lie is ok if it is not pertinent information to their medical c...

    Read More

  • Metaphysics of Morals

    1153 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... value through discussing duty in light of a priori and experience. In conclusion, he suggests that because actions depend on specific circumstances, a priori beliefs cannot be extracted from experience. People’s experiences and actions are based on circumstantial motivations; thus they can’t conform to categorical imperatives either because categorical imperatives are principles that are intrinsically good and must be obeyed despite the circumstance or situation. Kant concludes that rational beings are ends in themselves and that principle is a universal law, which comes from reason and not experience.

    Read More

  • Virtue Ethics: Case Study: Virtue Ethics

    1366 Words  | 3 Pages

    The first prima facie duty is fidelity, and one of the subsets it lists is one should not lie in any aspect of their lives. This binding duty is something that Randall should consider when deciding if he should say anything. The ethical obligations that Randall has to the buyers of said car, his team and company are all different. His ethical obligation to himself is to live a truthful life which can lead to a good character. Furthermore, the ethical obligation Randall has to the consumers is also do not lie. Ross considers it a duty of fidelity to not lie and lying to unsuspecting individuals could result in them trusting you and possibly buying the product (Bivins, 26). One of the ethical obligations toward the stakeholders based on Ross’s prima facie duties is the duty of justice. Ross states that if someone receives a gift that brings him or her happiness, it is up to them to provide or prevent the distribution, regardless of their position or power (Bivins, 26). This is applicable to Randall, as he has an ethical obligation to speak up or ignore his gut feeling. Randall accepted the position, which means he has an ethical obligation to his company unless he quits. The ethical obligation of the automobile company would be a duty of beneficence. The duty of beneficence is applicable to the company because they are introducing a new car

    Read More

  • Philosophy: Ethics and Morality

    2484 Words  | 5 Pages

    To act morally means one must think and act in such a way that always considers, supports, and attempts to improve general welfare; furthermore, such thoughts and actions must occur because of moral intentions, not just because one has to. Also, pre-defined rules exist for the common good and these rules help with moral judgment. Such rules would include “no killing”, “no stealing”, and “no lying”. These don’t exist to provide an advantage or cause disadvantage—they exist simply for the good of every individual. To have morality means one must always adhere to these rules no matter the consequences, who is affected, or how it happens, because they only ensure the most good for everyone. However, one’s own standards for morality must also remain considerate of that of others’.

    Read More

  • Prima Facie Duty

    1045 Words  | 3 Pages

    The concepts that reflect in John decision making are the difference between prima facie duty vs actual duty, reciprocity, beneficence, hypothetical imperative,teleological ethics, hierarchy of value,and nonmaleficence. The meaning of Prima facie duty is the duty at first glance or on the surface. The meaning of actual duty is the duty that comes after further thinking or reflecting. John prima facie duty is seen when he said “At first I thought that if I was that desperate, I would want someone to help me out so I had the responsibility to do the same.” So his first glance at the situation was to

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant: Categorical Imperative And Ethical Deliberation

    694 Words  | 2 Pages

    Moral duty and moral law can be expressed as categorical imperative. We must look at categorical imperatives in order to determine what we ought to do regardless of what we want to happen. It concerns not the matter of the action, or its intended result, but its form and the principle that results. What is essentially good consists in the mental disposition of consequences that result without it being interfered. Kant’s great moral principle, categorical imperative, has to be a priori.

    Read More

  • The Objectivity and Rationality of Morality

    1134 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... yield. As such Kant may be justified to an extent in saying that most

    Read More

  • Developing a Life Pattern of Happiness

    698 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...s thank you to others makes them incredibly happy. We also must express gratitude for ordinary things such as a beautiful blue sky during the daytime or sparkling stars at night. Get in the habit of finding at least 10 things to be grateful for each day to increase your happiness level.

    Read More

More about Analysis Of W. D. Ross Ideas Of How We Should Act

Open Document