Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Women: Marked or Unmarked? Deborah Tannen’s essay, “There Is No Unmarked Woman”, explores the idea of “marked” and “unmarked” words, styles, titles, and how females have no ability to choose an unmarked position in life. She posits that “The unmarked forms of most English words also convey ‘male’” (88). Tannen is incorrect in her premises because females are able to choose unmarked hair and clothing styles, men are marked just as often as women, and many unmarked forms of words no longer convey “male.”
In her essay, Tannen analyzes how the actions that women make will mark them in some way. Her point is that everything a woman does is somehow sending a message. Tannen notes that, “The unmarked tense of verbs in English is the present” and
…show more content…
She also says that “[men have] the option of being unmarked” by simply choosing to wear the expected clothing and displaying the standard hair style (88). Tannen is incorrect in this statement because women have the option of being unmarked as well. For example, by simply following standard business attire for women (typically suit/blazer, skirt/pants), they can choose to be unmarked. As for hairstyle, having a long (around shoulder length) hair length is the unmarked case for women, but this would be marked as different if a man had such a hairstyle. For example, there were two young men in my Boy Scout troop who let their hair grow out past their shoulders. If they were girls, this difference would have been overlooked, but since they were men, this sent a message, and most of the other youth marked them as unusual. A woman with long hair is seen as the standard, unmarked case, a man with long hair is not. Just as Tannen says that “Men can choose styles that are marked, but they don’t have to” women also can choose to be unmarked …show more content…
As much as Tannen says that “[the men] had the option of being unmarked”, she neglects the fact that other factors like race, speech, and how someone carries themselves can all affect how they are marked by their peers (88). For example, in Junot Diaz’s “How to date a brown girl”, his character is instantly marked by his date when she says, “I like Spanish guys” (103). Even though he is not from Spain, he will always be marked in this way when he is around racially different groups. This can apply to any race, and it is impossible for someone to choose to not send that message. Another area where people can be marked is speech. When a person is from a particular region of the U.S., they will have a noticeable accent that connects them to the stereotypes of that region. Just like Tannen asserts that women have no style that is unmarked, so there is no style of speech that is unmarked (89). One other area Tannen did not discuss is how someone carries themselves, what kind of body language they unconsciously use. Unintentional body language like leaning in, head tilting, and upward gazing can be marked in the same way that Tannen suggests that women’s clothing can be, an “unintended [message] of availability” (89). Furthermore, when a man works in a predominately female profession, he cannot escape being marked. For example, when most people think of a nurse, they assume that they
...e obvious skin colors and tones, and inflections that occur in speech. Other than those two, females should only wear one set of earrings that are tastefully accepted by the status quo, and males should only be allowed to wear khaki’s that are snuggly supported by a belt.
In Deborah Tannen’s “Marked Woman, Unmarked Men” she illustrates how she believes the way women carry themselves are more looked upon then the way a man does. When it comes to women they had to take what they look like into consideration and each decision that the woman has made, carried a meaning. Men have to make decisions as well, however their decisions are not as notable as woman. I support Tannen’s argument about women being marked. Woman are marked by what they wear to who they marry. Nonetheless, I do believe both genders are marked in some kind of way. Men are marked, just not to the extent as woman are. And when they are marked it is not as open and discussed. When Tannen did include men into her argument she made her observation
During the Victorian Era, society had idealized expectations that all members of their culture were supposedly striving to accomplish. These conditions were partially a result of the development of middle class practices during the “industrial revolution… [which moved] men outside the home… [into] the harsh business and industrial world, [while] women were left in the relatively unvarying and sheltered environments of their homes” (Brannon 161). This division of genders created the ‘Doctrine of Two Spheres’ where men were active in the public Sphere of Influence, and women were limited to the domestic private Sphere of Influence. Both genders endured considerable pressure to conform to the idealized status of becoming either a masculine ‘English Gentleman’ or a feminine ‘True Woman’. The characteristics required women to be “passive, dependent, pure, refined, and delicate; [while] men were active, independent, coarse …strong [and intelligent]” (Brannon 162). Many children's novels utilized these gendere...
In “Marked Woman, Unmarked Men”, Deborah Tannen argues many points about how women are targeted based on their style choices, such as makeup, clothing and hair, as well as their last names, and titles they choose to take on. Tannen argues her stance when she says, “Each of the women at the conference had to make decisions about hair, clothing, makeup and accessories…. Men can choose styles that are marked, but they don 't have to… . Unlike the women, they had the option of being unmarked.” here you can clearly see that Tannen is illustrating her point by showing the difference in how men are looked at compared to women. She clearly believes that men don’t have to take their style, and lack of makeup, into consideration. In other words, this is a perfect representation of her argument in “Marked Women, Unmarked Men”
Each gender has its little tells and associations, the movie Victor Victoria depicts gender cues very accurately and well. Victor Victoria is a movie about a woman, who wants to have a successful singing career, but in order to do so she must pretend to be a man pretending to be a woman. This movie takes place in the 1930’s in Paris, France during the winter time. One gender cue I noticed was how women and men wore their coats differently. Men tended to wear their coats over their shoulders without putting their arms in the sleeves and women, wore their coats a help their coats together with their hand placed close to their chest, indicating they feel cold. Another gender cues I noticed was when Carole "Toddy" Todd, played by Robert Preston,
Judith Butler’s concept of gender being performative focuses on how it creates a sequence of effect or impression. Human have a consistent way of talking about their gender as if it were something that is simply a fact. People go about their lives following patterns that are interconnected with their male or female appearance. They get very settled in the expected behaviors and common attributes of male or female, without recognizing that gender is a social construction. It is difficult to wrap your head around the idea that gender is always changing and being reproduced because it is conversation that often goes unnoticed. Butler realizes that it will be a struggle to get people to grasp the idea that nobody actually is their gender and that
Have you ever judge a book by the cover or made a bad first impression without getting to know the person first? Human beings need to come to the realization that everyone come from different walks of paths. We need to stop labeling people as "the other." No-Name Woman, Kingston 's aunt experienced Edward Said 's concept through the people in her village by them looking at her situation through a one-sided lens. The village that Kington 's family lived in had a preconceive notion on what the people should behave like and adultery was like a sin and a crime no matter of the circumstances.
There is no doubt that the literary written by men and women is different. One source of difference is the sex. A woman is born a woman in the same sense as a man is born a man. Certainly one source of difference is biological, by virtue of which we are male and female. “A woman´s writing is always femenine” says Virginia Woolf
There is no such thing as an unmarked person. Tannen thinks that there are no unmarked women, but that there can be unmarked men; however, I do not think that is true. I think that unmarked people do not exist. They are figment s of peoples' imagination, like Santa Claus or the tooth fairy. By saying that there are unmarked men, she is saying that there is just one generic type of guy and most guys can fit that stereotype. How can there be one type of person that would fit every single male on this planet? There are so many different people in
Nilsen began this study of the dictionary not with the intention of prescribing language change but simply to see what the language would reveal about sexism to her. Sexism is not something that existing independently in American English or in the particular dictionary that she happened to read. Rather it exists in people's minds.
Early Modern English." Feminist Studies 19.2 (1993): 377+. JSTOR. Feminist Studies Inc.,. Web. 11 Dec. 2013.
In the text "The Sexing of the body" Sterling argues that scientist should not only worry about the physical feature to determine someone's sexuality but also on the characteristics. Sterling writes," But behaviors are generally social activities, expressed in interaction with distinctly separate beings. Thus, as we move from genitalia on the outside to the invisible psyche..."(Sterling, 29). When a scientist steps out of that box of determining gender based on the physical feature it can change the perspective of how gender is viewed in society. In the same way, The Text "Baboons with Briefcases vs Langurs with Lipstick" by Susan Sperling shows how scientist should overlook physical features and DNA to determining what is gender. Sperling writes, "Other things shape behavior besides genes and Shape it in important ways for the organisms in question..."(Sperling, 250). Our behavior can say a lot about the gender we are but Sperling demonstrates that even the behavior aspect of determining gender should be furthered studied. Both of these Authors show how scientist try to construct and validify the our sexuality is already with us and it not constructed by society. When viewing how scientist makes their studies there is some type of biased and gender stereotypes connected to these
The prejudice the women tolerate is evidenced by their tendency to dress in men’s clothing in order to be heard or considered (Olson). As women, their voices are inhibited or disregarded; they are overshadowed and overlooked by society. Portia, for example, has little choice but to consent to being the prize in her “loving” late father’s lottery. All decisions are made in regard to her future and life is influenced by men. The fact that the father is deceased does not diminish his power. In fact, his status a...
According her first test about four women and eight men, it is undeniable that the women's style make everyone note them, unlike men. "I asked myself what style we women could have adopted that would have been unmarked, like the men's. The answer was none. There is no unmarked woman." Similarly, in the language, the distinguishing between men and women is obvious. So once again, the woman born has a special charm even if she does not try to make up. It is also a completely different, it is not confused between the colorful field. Women are an increasing part, "because thier gender pick up extra meaning that reflex common association with female". They keep their attention to themselves, and more attractive to men, especially when they notice
The article “What it Means to be Gendered Me” by Betsy Lucal examines how gender is structured and socialized in the US. It also examines the social construction of gender and the implications of gender. Gender is pervasive in our society with people constantly attributing gender to other people because it is what we are socialized to do. Betsy Lucal provided an analysis of her experiences as a woman whose appearances often leads to gender misattribution due to the fact that there are “two and only two” genders (Lucal, 301). These socialized gender types make it hard for people who don’...