Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The media effect of the watergate scandal
Explain the watergate scandal
Explain the watergate scandal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The media effect of the watergate scandal
In The Watergate Crisis, Michael A. Genovese analyzes the factors leading up to the Watergate crisis, what the whole scandal meant to Americans at this time, what the Watergate scandal has come to mean currently, and how it has molded American politics permanently. Genovese offers a detailed psychoanalysis of Richard Nixon, the 37th president of the United States, and the possible motivations behind his actions before, during, and after the Watergate crisis. Genovese provides a thorough and superb record of the events of Watergate in which he includes the ways many members of Nixon’s Administration got their hands dirty and their futile efforts at washing them clean.
The Watergate Crisis concludes that the profoundly memorable and intensely appalling atrocity, Watergate, “tested our system and ourselves.” Genovese does not merely tell of the events of Watergate, he goes on to dissect the effects of the incident. In the preface, the author tidily summarizes the influence of this crisis by stating that “time has not altered the sting of Watergate. It remains a profoundly sad and unnecessary scar on the political landscape.” This book delves into how presidential corruption is the worst possible offense because it results in the deep-seated distrust of the government.
Genovese does not utilize a chronological sequencing method to compose The Watergate Crisis; instead he combines a series of chapters, each of which are focused on crucial facets of the Watergate catastrophe. Genovese provides a chronology of the events that transpired in the form of a timeline, in addition to the list of the key players in the introduction to the book, the conclusion comprises an array of biographies about them as well. The appendices only add to ...
... middle of paper ...
...o immoral acts with ease. These immoral acts were accomplished by Nixon’s ability to “shed what seemed to be deeply felt and long-held beliefs when it suited his career. Though his chameleon-like quality aided his rise to power, it did not guide him in the uses of power.”
Genovese’s The Watergate Crisis is exceptionally well written and provides tremendous insight to readers, not only of the scandal itself but about the orchestrator of the orchestra known as Watergate. Being a book of history, which is often a difficult field to write in if one intends to both get the point across and keep the audience interested, Genovese does an impeccable job on both avenues. As only a part of a series it is hard to imagine what more there is to be explored after reading The Watergate Crisis seeing as the author makes a great use out of its each and every one of its 224 pages.
Rick Perlstein argues over whether "Nixonland", a country at war with itself, still resides in the heart of America. The book took a in depth look at Nixon’s political career from the beginning up to the outcome of the 1972 election, as well as how America’s political scene went from perceived consensus in the LBJ era to the bitterly divided right versus left, also known as the red state/blue state split. Perlstein’s argument is that we are still living in Nixonland. “Nixonland” is a study of the consensus, it isn’t just about Nixon, he isn’t the protagonist of Nixonland although it does include his rise and fall; instead, the protagonist of Nixonland is the American voter who found themselves voting Democrat in 1964 and then Republican in 1972 for the same reasons. This book covers the American political and cultural terrain from LBJ’s liberal landslide in 1964, through Nixon’s comeback in 1968, and land...
While he used these characteristics to persuade others to act illegal and conduct crimes, he still modeled the characteristics of an exemplar leader which include: modeling the way; inspiring a shared vision; challenging the process; enabling others to act; and encouraging the heart (Kouzes & Posner, 2006). He set the example of how he wanted his administration and those that worked directly with/under him to act. He employed and persuaded others to behave and act in a “by any means necessary” manner. This can be seen from the documentary which details and shows how those closest to him and the Plumbers acted and thought in a manner that was modeled by President Nixon. He further inspired a shared vision by uniting his followers to believe that they were working to keep confidential information safe, that other governmental agencies could not be trusted, and united his follower to believe in his purpose and vision for the country. According to Kouzes and Posner (2006), “leadership is the ability to move people, to change their minds and hearts and actions” (Kouzes & Posner, 2006, p. 67). This is evident within the documentary on which some of those involved in these covert affairs were described as Christian men with good values and hearts, whom never participated in the women, alcohol and corruption that surrounds
unearthed one of the biggest political scandals of the 20th century. Bernstein and Woodward were not aware of how well they worked together. "They had never worked on a s...
Richard Nixon was in one of the most controversial issues that the United States has ever seen. The Watergate Scandal is now well known throughout history today. This issue led to Nixon resigning only 2 years in his 2nd term. Did President Nixon make the right decisions? Can anyone really trust the government after a situation like this? Some Historians believe that this changed the course of history, and that we can never truly trust the government again. While others believe that Nixon didn’t make the right decisions; however, this should not change the way the people look at our government. The government and the people need to keep a strong trust.
It is clear that while political scandal, primarily the 1974 Watergate scandal, played a large role in the rapidly declining confidence in government between 1968 and 1980, it is not the sole or even the dominant factor. The Watergate scandal only impacted on the Nixon era, and subsequently lead to measures that should have prevented further distrust in the government. Instead, the role played by the four presidents who held office in those years was the main reason behind the decline in confidence. The role of the presidents and their White House administrations encompassed political scandals, and also clearly influenced other factors such as the role
Super, John C., ed. “Nixon’s Resignation and Pardon.” Salem Press. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Feb. 2014. .
President Richard M. Nixon and his involvement in the Watergate scandal were broadcast nightly on the 6 o’clock news in the early 1970’s. Americans were engrossed with the scandal and each person held his or her own view of situation. Each broadcast or newspaper article created a mistrust of political and governmental leaders. In response to this mistrust, the Freedom to Information Act was strengthened by the United States Congress in 1973 (Chamberlain). Although this act was first placed into law in the late 1960’s, the Watergate scandal provided the incentive make this law stronger.
Though it has been nearly forty years since this scandal occurred, evidence of Nixon’s role in the Watergate scandal does not exist. To this day, no one knows if he was the one who ordered the break-in to occur at the Watergate Hotel in the first place. However, his role after the break-in initially occurred is now a well-known part of history. On June 23, 1971, Nixon and his White House Chief of Staff, H.R. “Bob” Haldeman recorded a conversation they had pertaining to how they would use the CIA to obstruct an investigation conducted by the FBI on the Watergate break-ins. During the recording, Nixon also mentioned that he asked the CIA to slow the FBI’s investigation down, claiming that an investigation done now would serve as a national security risk. When...
[1] Watching Oliver Stone’s Nixon (1995) and the director’s earlier film JFK (1991), it is difficult to have kind thoughts about Richard Nixon. Stone’s investment in the figure of the president manifests itself in two ways: first, in the director’s fixation on Nixon as a symbol of the corrupt political landscape after President John Kennedy’s assassination, and, second, his fixation on Nixon as a symbol of a failed patriarch or an ineffective father figure who led the country into further turmoil. Stone has argued that he hoped to elicit sympathy for Nixon, but I will show that the director’s emphasis on Nixon as an epic tragedy, especially in conjunction with the Beast thesis, does not allow for sympathy or understanding of the man or his politics.
There are controversial moments occurring in the world every day, as seen across news stations and internet pages everywhere. The U.S has been home to a plethora of controversial moments such as the Coalgate, Chinagate, Deflategate, and Monicagate scandals. These scandals share the common suffix “gate” from the original “Watergate” Scandal, which is considered to be one of the largest political scandals in American history. This scandal is possibly one of the most significant series of events to occur in the entire world to this day for several reasons. Primarily, this scandal filled every American citizen that followed it with doubt, fear, and complete mistrust for the government system due to the casual attempt to abuse a position of power multiple times from then President Richard Nixon. What exactly went down during this long-winded
The years leading up to the 1972 election were filled with new political tactics. Going into the election year, President Nixon seemed like he could never lose the second term election after successfully negotiating with Vietnam, Beijing, and Russia to improve international relations (Emery 4). Raising international toughness made Nixon seem like the most worthy person to stay president. Fred Emery analyses in his novel Watergate: The Corruption of American Politics and the Fall of Richard Nixon, the president was also setting up the first summit meeting in history with Soviet Union Presidents (3). There seemed to be nothing capable of holding the seemingly responsible man back. However, this assurance came with massive consequences. The absolute certainty that Nixon would be reelected fueled the lies and abuse of power by the Nixon government (Emery 195). As the outlook of landslide winnings took over the White House, the moral reasoning, “the end justifies the means” became more prevalent. Nixon was obsessed with winning and being successful. Under his command his staff did whatever possible to ...
Super, John C., ed. “Nixon’s Resignation and Pardon.” Salem Press. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Feb. 2014. .
experienced, worse than that of Ulysses Grant, worse than even than of the president that was forced to resign, Richard Nixon "(Murray, 389)!
After successfully ending American fighting in Vietnam and improving international relations with the U.S.S.R. and China, Richard Nixon became the only President to ever resign the office, as a result of the Watergate scandal. Hubris has come to refer to recklessness and overconfidence among those who wield power in financial or political fields- particularly when it leads to disastrous errors of judgement. The word Watergate has entered the political dictionary as a term synonymous with corruption and scandal as a result of the overwhelming pride, or hubris, of President Richard Nixon, who engulfed himself in his own omnipotence.
Thesis: Governor Willie Starkie surrounded himself with people that were crooked, just like President Richard Nixon. The people who were in charge of getting Nixon elected did what was necessary to get Nixon elected.