Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Guatemalan genocide essay 1000 words
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Guatemalan genocide essay 1000 words
One positive aspect of the book is how Sanford includes actual accounts of the massacre from the survivors, instead of briefly summarizing them herself. It would be quicker and easier for her to briefly point out what the testimonies said and what aspects they had in common. I thought reading the perspective of the massacre from different people like a widow, someone who was recruited to be a member of the Guatemalan army, someone who was forced to become a member of the army, etc. gave me a new perspective on the massacres. These testimonies and the pictures give the reader an emotional tie to the data that is being presented. I believe using the emotions of the reader helps them see her point that they Guatemalan army intended to harm their
Rauchway created more of a story with factual information making it more engaging to the reader. I felt the arguments that Rauchway provided were fairly accurate creating a balance of both sides of the story. With being engaged in the novel, it helped me understand a time in history that I never understood before. I was able to understand more of Roosevelt’s direction of his presidency as he helped America become hopeful of the future. After the assassination many citizens were devastated, but it came to their realization that it was a wakeup call for the political system. Rauchway makes it clear in the novel of how Roosevelt faced one of America’s toughest times, but through that time helped American grow stronger as a nation. What I like about Rauchway writings is that he organizes the storyline and it is detailed in every chapter explaining the smallest parts of the story. For example, he mentions the time of the hour, the emotions of the characters, Czolgosz life history, etc. He does not miss any facts, which is very helpful to know background information when just learning about a
I chose to read this book due to wanting to learn more information, and learn the hard facts and truth of this horrid massacre. I myself was in a similar situation, a school I had gone to had threats of being bombed and shot at, as well as students including myself being threatened to be harmed if they did specific actions or did nothing at all, and I was extremely adamant on learning more about what happened when things, such as the Columbine Highschool Massacre, do
After reading the story, I found I had mixed emotions about it. To explain, when we were getting into detail and finally finding out what really happened the day of June 28th, I found myself completely interested and glued to the book. I also enjoyed the way the incident was explained because I felt like I was there watching it all happen from the great detail. I enjoyed Phillips style of writing because through his writing, he really came off as an intelligent person who is very familiar with the legal system. The book is an easy read, and I liked the non-pretentious style of writing. I did not find myself struggling with reading the book at all, which made the overall experience that much more enjoyable.
And probably the most influential person in the book, E.D. Morel. Morel, an employee of a Belgian company that handled shipments to the Congo, noticed that the shipments coming to and from the Congo seemed really suspicious. He put two and two together and realized what was happening. Morel was essentially the spring board of as Hochschild describes "The first Human rights campaign of the 20th century." I believe Hochschild tries to show his readers a holocaust that was going on in the African interior, how it was virtually unnoticed by the rest of the world and how easy it was to cover up. Hochschild also does a good job of showing how history somehow conceals the fact that it was going on. The book has many strengths I really enjoyed how he didn't try to portray everyone in the book as perfect including the protagonist some were conceited selfish etc.
The killings made by the slaves are saddening, too. Mutilating the whites and leaving their bodies lying is inhumane. It is such a shocking story. This book was meant to teach the reader on the inhumanity of slavery. It also gives us the image of what happened during the past years when slavery was practised.
The ways in which the author could strengthen the book, in my opinion, is instead all the descriptive, to me meaningless points as how they were coloring themselves, the author should have put a little bit more facts in there to make it more documentary. Anyhow, overall the book has strength in letting the reader understand the history from both sides, whites and Indians. Many people have different views on the persecution of Native Americans, some think that it was all Indians’ fault and that they caused their own suffering, which I think is absolutely ridiculous, because they were not the ones who invaded. And Native Americans had every right to stand up for the land that was theirs.
Although it was very graphic it explained the horrific mistreatment of the slaves that were packed in so tightly they couldn’t even move on their sides and describing it as a slaughterhouse. I found it interesting how in previous history textbooks I had read in high school the conditions of the transportation of slaves had not been explained in such a gruesome way. It was useful in trying to comprehend the unspeakable living conditions in which the slaves had to live
... book included the strikers’ raid on the replacement workers, for it illustrated the roles of the different groups involved, such as the police, the vigilantes, the strikers and the scabs. Another intense portion of the book was that of the strikers’ raid on the apple orchard in which they attacked their replacements, for it showed the type of brutality that the strikers could carry out to send their message. The scene where Mac tortures a young boy who was caught around Anderson’s barn when it was set on fire is also a very intense scene. The aspect of the book that I did not care for was that of their being no explanation of what happened after the strike was resolved. It would have been interesting to learn about the type of effect that the strike had on the people, as well as what type of change occurred among them. Because of the interesting perspectives that this book provides, I would recommend that others read it. I would especially recommend this book to those who do not fully understand the power of the group and how it can be manipulated by its leaders, because the book goes into great detail of how this is accomplished. I would give this book a four star rating ****.
The author presented the information in a very solid way and sectioned it out very well. I understood what he was trying to explain. It was somewhat a long book but very much full of knowledge and history that in spirit is still alive today. We may not have slavery like it was then, but we still deal with racism and prejudice daily.
The Boston Massacre was a fundamental event at the beginning of the American Revolution. The massacre became part of anti-British propaganda for Boston activists and fed American fears of the English military in both the North and South. The Boston Massacre was the first “battle” in the Revolutionary War. Although it wasn’t until five years after the Boston Massacre that the Revolutionary War officially began, the Boston Massacre was a forecast of the violent storm to come.
I believe that is book greatly agreed and supported the teachings of the text book. Going into greater detail and more specific instances it brought the examples into a greater perspective and context. The power of yellow journalism which we covered in class was extremely highlight in this reading. When the journalist blasted and fabricated these stories they reach far beyond just their immediate community and affected the minds of Americans all over the United States.
...e reader into the story. It is this detail, however, that made the story get off track during several scenes. In his story-writing Jones has a tendency to be talking about thing and then suddenly tangent off into another direction for a few pages. All of these different directions that the story is going can make it difficult to differentiate between past and present time as well as it may confuse the reader about which character is being described at a given time. The vocabulary of the novel was not difficult to comprehend and even jargon of the slaves, which can be difficult to translate, was easy to understand. Overall, as long as "The Known World" is read carefully enough and differentiation can be made between tales of the past and present, the novel successfully sheds light of aspects of pre-Civil War slavery that novels of the past have failed to do.
My response to chapters 1-3 This novel made me remember when came in to this country and how everything was at the begging in California. We didn't know anything about here everything was so different from Mexico but my family and I had dreams just like America and Candido. When Candido got run over by Delaney it king of made me upset, because it wasn't Candido's fault and the First thing that Delaney thought of was his car, insurance discount, and the last thing was the victim. Those king of thing are thing that us Mexican have to deal with for coming to a new country to have a better future. What made me more upset was when Delaney gave hime twenty dollars. Is it that how much a life of a person worth? What if thing would of happened the
I was appalled to read the beginning of the paper. The intense training and encouragement of fighting made me feel sick. They are just children. They were raised by the government and not their parents. The children lived in barracks with minimal learning abilities. That made me feel bad for the children. They were only allowed one garment which confused me on how that helped them. Also why they had such poor sleeping arrangements surprised me. The facts that fights were encouraged made me feel like they were barbaric. They did this so children were able to take punishment easier. That made me feel confused.
I thought that all of these events that were building during the course of the novel, with the poisonings and accelerating violence, would lead to the ending being more action packed. For example, I was expecting the ending to be a revolt or even just the start of a revolt, and the actual ending was much more intriguing because it was devoid of action but full of meaning. Having the novel end with Lissette pledging to keep her child and pledging for the child to grow up free was very impactful. It showed that while Lissette was not part of the revolution that she was a number of the growing population that provided that sentiment to fight captivity that eventually led to the revolution. Another interesting part was the juxtaposition between Lisette and her Aunt Briggette. Brigette chose to rebel against slavery by performing abortions for slaves and preventing children to be born into slavery, while Lisette pledged at the end to keep her child, but make sure it was born into freedom and not slavery, or she will not allow her to be born at all. Which to me seems more like Lisette will die for her freedom with the child as opposed to her getting an abortion. Overall, The Infamous Rosalie provided a unique view into Haitian slavery and was an excellent read that provided a very wide and complete view of the horrors and developments of slavery in the French colony, and provided the sentiment that were the seeds to the eventually successful revolution much later in