Analysis Of The Man I Killed 'By Tim O' Brien

494 Words1 Page

The man I Killed
What is peace and how can we achieve it? Since our existence on earth, we humans have used lies, manipulation, corruption, and war to achieve short lasting peace. We have fought and killed, sinned and committed unforgivable crimes, that we can’t repent. But we still use these as “solution tools” to create peace, that only one party can experience while the other party experiences sorrow and pain. But on the other side of the coin, the one side who achieved peace will experience a tremendous loss, many soldiers will be dead, some will regret their actions, and some of them will develop PTSD or Shell shock. This is exactly what the story “The Man I Killed” by Tom O’Brien is about. Where the main character O’ Brien kills a young boy and begins to feel remorse.
The story is told through a first-person narrator. From the protagonist O’Brien’s point of view instead of the narrator himself. Where we get access to the protagonist’s thoughts and emotions, based on dialog, actions and thought. The first-person narrator is personal because of the frequent use of “I, the narrator only chooses what to show or tell the reader. This story doesn’t contain narrative comments. …show more content…

His age is unknown, but we can presume that he is about 20 years-old and from The United States. He Is a flat character because he doesn’t change throughout the story. His appearance isn’t described either. Throughout the story, he makes up and shapes the dead Vietnamese soldier’s life and the condition of the corpse. “He had been born, maybe, in 1946 in the village of My Khe near the central coastline of Quang Ngai Province…” page (1. Ll. 21-23), “ His jaw was in his throat, his upper lip and teeth were gone…” page (1. Ll. 1). When Tim met the Vietnamese Solider, on the battlefield, they both knew that only one could survive. As Tim talks about his life we get the feeling that their lives are the

Open Document