Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of violence on children through television
Violence on television and its effects on young children
Effects of violence in media on younger audiences
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
One TV Show that comes to mind is the Jerry Springer the first show aired in 1991 on NBC amongst others on regular TV it viewing times were at 11:00am and 1:00 pm Monday through Friday. The deviant behavior had associated to the degrading, violence and trash talking when on stage. To scorn themselves by immoral and unjust behavior in the public eyes was very degrading and beneath the television show standards Viewer and critics realizing the Jerry Springer show primary focus was to attract and target the attention of a lower diversified culture. Possibly exposing on “dirty Laundry” as a perspective or appeal. The influential group of guests that appeared on the Jerry Springer show, relative to the same common behaviors and relationships which …show more content…
may exist in today’s society. The shows intended for larger dynamic social groups of viewers which shared the same relationship experiences.
More than likely relate to a lower cultural deviant behavior who could comprehend to such behaviors. Diversified social groups reacted with receptive acceptance of the show identifying, relating or finding it to be entertaining. Meanwhile, Jeff Arrowood, head of programming for WCCB-TV, Charlotte, N.C. "felt the topic was a repeat and without the physical element it will impact the Jerry Springer talk show. However, realizing a bigger issue at …show more content…
stake. Feeling as though he was not receiving answers regarding the change. Mr. Arrowood possibly believed if the content change was significant, the show he purchased, could mean he would no longer be contractually bound to air it. He too believes the deviant behaviors attracted the viewer. When acquired Multimedia Entertainment's talk assets in December 1996, discussed cleaning up the show. They felt the need not to for their reasons being ``Jerry Springer'' is outrageous, over-the-top talk show that's best summed up in the tag line: ``It's a crazy world, have fun with it.'' Viewers enthusiastically agree, voting every day with their remote controls and VCRs. By continuously watching this talk only prolonged change. While middle to upper class social groups and critics chose to become non-.viewers. Understood the severity and influential impact and presented the Jerry Springer show reveled even for younger viewers. Although the show were not to be advocated for everyone.
The debate was not their intention to condoned children to watch and rate the program appropriately. Many others, including parents, identifying why they should not have to monitor their children's TV viewing. The social groups with no interest thought the show authentication and its appeal appeared staged. Being rejected when undermining the characters and the credibility of the guests and the host. Impacted Jerry Springer ranting’s which drop to an all-time low. According to Greg Springer, (1999) the reduction for the talk show ‘Jerry Springer,” in the first quarter 1999, was an effort to reduce the violence of the show. B making preparations of television broadcasters to change the program's schedule. Even though the Jerry Springer talk show aired on other channels they too experienced impacted from the display of violence, forcing a change to be more appropriate for daytime television. The one word answer appeared to be ratings. It looked upon the there's an old adage in this business, that when the ratings go high enough, sex and violence become romance and adventure. The all knew Jerry on the edge was where we want him to
be.
In an interview in 1974, Producer and show creator Norman Lear said of his television sitcom, All in the Family: “People laugh harder at the things they care the most about.” ("Day at Night: Norman Lear, renowned TV producer ("All in the Family")." ) If that is true then the viewers most certainly must have cared about the topics being addressed on the show because All in the Family topped the Neilsen ratings, ranking number-one, from 1971 to 1976. As with any successful producer, Lear’s and co-producer Bud Yorkin’s primary goal was to get ratings. The fact that All in The Family arguably became one of the most influential television sitcoms ever aired was just a bonus. The show became a soap box for its creators, producers and writers to broadcast their political views as well as provide them with a vehicle to combat what they saw as social injustice. By featuring relevant themes of social significance such as death, divorce, racism, rape, and homosexuality, each week, the program put the spot light on topics previously discussed in hushed tones behind closed doors. While high ratings may have been the first priority, the producers definitely had an additional agenda to try to bring about social change by stimulating dialog and debate within families, neighborhoods, local hangouts, anywhere Americans would congregate.
When asked "What is the trashiest show on television?" I wouldn't doubt that the majority of the population would agree that it was The Jerry Springer Show. The show deals with people and there issues in the way like many other self-help shows do, for example Oprah or Dr. Phil, but the issues that are dealt with are quite different. Although one may argue that the people on The Jerry Springer Show are simply freaks, a sociologist would say that the issues on the show are dysfunctions of society and this show is an outlet for them to show off their abnormality. We must first understand the life of Jerry Springer to analyze his role on the show. Without a doubt, the show affects the morals and norms of society along with our perception of class, gender, and sexuality. Another important aspect is the role of the audience on the show and how that effects the roles of the guests.
The shows portrays a melting pot of each character lives with money, sex, social media, and relationships unfiltered and toxic, yet irrelevant to the real –world. Another key point is the exploitation of the television world and the millions of viewers, that it’s okay sociably to exemplify deviant behaviors in real –life. Also, culturally and sociably, the reality show creates a bigger problem as the platform provided for the cast is characterized in a negative state. On the negative side, this creates the illusion to act in like manner, from the deviant behavior portrayed on
This essay will examine my thoughts and those of David Sterrit on the critically acclaimed television show The Honeymooners. First, I will talk about the Honeymooners and it’s setting in postwar America. Secondly, the social and cultural issues the series portrayed. Next, would be the psychological perspective and the aesthetics of the show. Finally, the essay would conclude with my thoughts on how the Honeymooners were impacted by these aspects, but also how the show managed to leave a legacy in television today.
The number of sexually abused children is five times what it was in 2012. Jerry Sandusky has contributed to this statistic. Jerry Sandusky was the head coach of the Pennsylvania State Football team (Penn. State). He has a wife and a few children, some adopted from his charity organization, the second mile, but this did not stop him from committing the crimes he did. Jerry Sandusky was convicted of raping ten innocent children, some of which he met through his charity. This earned him thirty-sixty years behind bars. There are issues from this case that are similar to some issues in the play, Twelve Angry Men. Ultimately, throughout both cases the jury was faced with difficult decisions. In both cases the verdict took a long time and a lot of thinking. But, in the end both came out with the right resolution. Sandusky’s reputation of being the guy everyone looked up to made the overall decision of the jury, in this case, inordinately difficult.
Another theme seen all over today is the fighting between two men or woman for the love of a woman or man. So many television episodes have been designated for this theme because of its popularity with the media. Jerry Springer is just one example. So many people enjoy this show because of the violence that is shown when two people are fighting, especially two girls for one man. I think it's rather stupid though because there are plenty other men or women in this world that one could desire.
Jerry Springer is one of the most popular daytime talk show hosts. Each day on the Jerry Springer show, guest talk about their problems in front of national television. Jerry Springer helps his guest work through their problems by adding in comments to fuel the argument. During the show, the audience is watching the problem’s unfold with a dramatic twist to the guest’s conflicting matters. A typical day on the Jerry Springer show is filled with cursing, shouting and fighting. The fighting adds to the affect of the problem and keeps the audience entertained. The problem with the Jerry Springer show comes when the youth of America watches the program after they get home from school which is around 3 or 4 o’clock in the afternoon. A show like this only promotes violence and even talks about sexual content. One example is why a woman cheated on her husband with his sister. That might sound odd or out of the ordinary, but it attracts peoples’ attention and even our children’s.
By 1958, no one was laughing anymore. Grabbing the attention of the public even more than the shows themselves were the scandals which emerged around them. The public's naive trust had evolved into suspicious cynicism because it had learned that many of the shows were rigged. As can be imagined, this caused great disgust among viewers. The supposed winners, for whom Americans had ro...
The video Prison Moms was eye opening to the plight of women while pregnant as members of a correctional institution. This documentary focused on Pennsylvania based programs at Riverside correctional facility. The 2009 sentencing project study found that one out of every forty-three kids has a parent in prison and that sixty-five thousand and six hundred mothers were incarcerated as of 2007. The program offers a full-time staff Monday through Friday that work specifically with pregnant inmates and mother within the prison population with children under the age of three. This staff also works with the mother and the caregiver of the child outside of the corrections facility to keep the family unit “together”. The video also stated that eighty
"Jerry Seinfeld." Newsmakers 1992. Issue Cumulation. Gale Research, 1992. Reproducedin Biography Resource Center, Farminton Hills, Mich.: The Gale Group.
However, the way the show is constructed forms our judgement on individual’s behavior and decisions, which formulae society’s view too acceptable bad behavior. This is called Primary deviance, because this is the way TV networks present the initial act of deviance to younger viewers. As various young viewers began to watch this show and believe that the shows way of life and behaviors are acceptable. Several viewers will begin to act on the bad behavior, and continue to veer away from acceptable behavior, making this secondary deviance. We then decide to label them to be socially acceptable, and decide whether or not we can approve their behavior. Once a person has been labeled by others through secondary deviance, it is common for that person to incorporate that label into his or her own concept. They then develop a stigma or a powerfully negative label that greatly changes a person’s self-concept and social identity. Usually someone who has been stigmatized usually has lower self-esteem and may find it easier to come to terms with the label than fight it. We see it today in younger adults, where they are known to be party-crazy, go out and get wasted drunk while others label them as a hot- mess, but are acceptable to their bad behavior due to the fact that many people watching this shows think its ok for people in their early twenties to act
Reality Television has changed television in a way that no one could have imagined. Being the one of the most talked about genre in history, it is seen by millions of viewers. It has more ratings than any other kind of show (Breyer 16). From its start, there have been many Reality Television shows. Shows like The Real World, Survivor, Big Brother, and Jersey Shore. All of these give off a negative portrayal of reality. While Americans watch these shows, it seems that the show is real life, but in reality, no pun intended, before the show is even filmed, it’s written, edited, and produced (Breyer 21). Writers humiliate and degrade people just for the plot of the show, making their private lives public (Breyer 16).
Survivor, one of the first successful reality shows, is a show that puts a selected group of people in a beautiful setting leaving them to fend for themselves within the two different teams. Every week the two teams compete for rewards and immunity before someone is voted off at the end of each episode. The shows main theme is how the different people interact with one another, and since the theme of the show is outwit, outplay, and outlast there is plenty of drama to go around on the show. After almost ten seasons the show can’t just rely on the same premise that the show has been using for the four years it has been on the air so the producers have to rely on something else, sex.
Profanity and violence are mostly what is involved in reality tv. One advantage of having regulations would be that it would limit violence that can be a bad influence on younger viewers. “After being read arguments on both sides of the issue nearly two-thirds of parents (63%) say they favor new regulations to limit the amount of sex and violence in TV shows during the early evening hours, when children are most likely to be watching (35% are opposed).” (Facts and TV Statistics 2). By watching this kind of program, it encourages people to do what they do because they think that since those people are getting attention by doing that, they will get it too. With that being said, Shannon Kelly writes, “Some worry that if young people look to reality stars as role models, they might imitate the violence committed by the stars.” (Reali...
A similar example today would be reality TV, in particular Keeping Up with the Kardashians, because even though the majority of the audience is aware that the show is over-dramatic and features people with a lack of real talent, the show is advertising makes the show seem more palatable, and viewers are more likely to tune in. Same thing with “freak shows”; the audience is acutely aware that the performers are being exploited for their defects or strange talents, yet the showman makes the show more palatable to a wide audience through advertisement. Second, the lack of other mediums of entertainment from 1840-1940 is another attributable reason for the popularity of “freak shows”. During the heyday of “freak shows”, home television, movie theatres, and home computers were either not invented yet or not yet mainstream. So, there was not much competition to “freak shows” and if people wanted to get out of the house to watch a performance, “freak shows” were a cheaper alternative to the theatre.