Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on the importance of leadership
Importance of leadership to an organization
Importance of leadership to an organization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on the importance of leadership
During the first and second week of class we learned Chapter 1 from our textbook “Management Fundamentals” by Robert Lussier. And during our fourth week of class we read from our second book that we have for the class which is “Simply Managing” by Henry Mintzberg. While reading both of these I have found things that were similar between the two and things that were also different. In this paper I am going to talk about the things that I have found. Mintzberg uses a variety of different ways to describe managing. He knows from his own experiences that managing anything can be somewhat of a crazy job and can also be quite overwhelming. Mintzberg gives his own life experiences in his book which makes it put things into perspective more for the reader so in my opinion it makes it better to learn from. In Lussier’s book he talks about management being a series of certain steps and how there is a way to be an effective manager. According to Lussier the four steps are planning, organizing, leading, and controlling (Lussier, 2017). I do agree with these steps but going off of real life situations can help people out more because they learn what things are right and wrong to do in some of the situation that he uses. Next, a similarity that I have found is that according to our text it talks about something that Mintzberg said that Lussier …show more content…
One difference that I saw is in the way that they describe managing. Mintzberg uses real life examples to explain certain things about managing. Lussier on the other hand describes managing as a series of steps. The similarities that I found between the two are that no job is more vital to us than that of a manager. And also, one in which is about distinguishing leaders from managers. So with all of this being said I am looking forward to learning more from both of these books throughout the
between the two authors, they share similarities towards the message they try to send out.
what they believe in. The similar that both of authors for the common themes is that they
When you look at the books closely together, you can see how alike they are. Both authors use many analogies to get their points across. For example, Eboo used the Martin Luther King Jr. and George Washington analogy. King knew Washington was a slaveholder, and a symbol of democracy, and it “Neither paralyzed him nor made him cynical.” Both the essays also use repetition with words and phrases such as, “What is the point?”
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2007). Management (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Murray and Dicroce (2003) suggest that management is a process that uses resources to achieve specific goals effectively; basic management functions including planning, organising, coordinating, directing and controlling. The term of manager can be appointed to the person to plan, organise, coordinate, supervise, negotiate, evaluate and use resources available in the best way possible to achieve the best service. Alternativ...
Robbins, S.P., & Coulter, M. (2009). Management (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter. M. (2014). Management (12th ed.). Retrieved from: Colorado Technical University eBook Collection database.
However, while the functions that Fayol regarded as the most important elements of managerial work are not what can be observed from managers’ day to day activities, Mintzberg made some problems in his method of study to find out the nature of management. Also, while Fayol failed to draw a picture of management work in reality, Mintzberg was unsuccessful in giving an idea about what managers should do to be successful and effective. To some extent, Fayol and Mintzberd did not develop competing theories but theories about different dimensions of managerial work. In terms of gaining effectiveness in management, Fayol was performed better by indicating what managers should do to rather than just responding to the pressure of their job as what Mintzberg described. Therefore, it can be concluded that Fayol’s work is superior to Mintzberg’s and the latter is of rather ineffective
Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (2011). Contemporary management. (7 ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
The basic ideas of the two novels are also similar. They have to do with rebellion against the so-called perfect new world and the sanctuary
Robbins, S., Decenzo, D., & Coulter, M. (2013). Fundamentals of management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Choosing a topic for this paper was very difficult. Many topics seemed very interesting, but after reviewing many topics the choice was clear. I also took into consideration the fact that we would be presenting these topics to the class. So, I choose the communication process. It is very important in management. Having been a manager for three years, I felt I would be able to explain this topic well to the class.
Robbins, S.P., DeCenzo, D.A., & Coulter, M. (2013). Fundamentals of management (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Although it maximized efficiency and productivity but its main limitation was ignoring human aspects of employment. This is manifested in the following:
Kinicki, A., & Williams, B. K. (2011). Management: A practical introduction (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.