Analysis Of Shostakovich's Eleventh Symphony

1707 Words4 Pages

With the death of Stalin in 1953 artists of the Soviet Union found themselves with more political freedom, and they used this freedom to create art that expressed the inhumane actions that the regime continued to commit. During Stalin’s life Shostakovich constantly pushed the party beliefs, and after Stalin’s death Shostakovich began composing more of the music he deemed necessary. Twice in his life Shostakovich was denounced, and practically forced out his craft due to this formalist, anti-party music. Despite constantly being aware of the dangers, Shostakovich continued to write music that displeased the regime on a variety of political fronts. He could have easily left the country to write his masterpieces, but he loved his country too much, despite its political flaws, to be willing to run. Shostakovich’s Eleventh Symphony is a multi-narrative piece in that it retells the 1956 Budapest uprising, …show more content…

Shostakovich was neither obedient enough, nor stupid enough, to commit fully commit to either of the stories. “I was constantly under suspicion then, and critics counted what percentage of my symphonies were in a major key, and what percentage in a minor key” (Volkov, 135-136). As long as the regime deemed him important, Shostakovich knew that he could not get away with the smallest of anti-party acts; he was also aware of people being unable to understand his works as he intended them. Even his most popular wartime work, the seventh symphony was not understood by all listeners nearly twenty years after her wrote it (Volkov, 136). This describes the paradox of Shostakovich, he knew he could not write the music that he deemed necessary, but he also refused to write the music that others told him was necessary. Instead what he chooses to write about the tragedy he wants to, by hiding it alongside the tragedy he should

Open Document