Analysis Of Popular Go To War By Armand Petito

629 Words2 Pages

Popular Vote to go to War By Armand Petito A popular vote to go to war would not benefit the American population. Allowing constituents to directly vote would cause a large negative impact throughout the entire United States. For example, “Senator Bevridge spoke in 1911 on behalf of one of the hundreds of constitutional proposals stating, “Political parties . . . elect a legislature and [the] majority in that legislature is not supposed, nor even sanctioned, according to the pristine theory of then Constitution, to cull the best man in the State. . . . It must cull a man of the party which elected the legislature. . . So it comes to pass that senators have genuinely been . . . culled by the ‘party managers’ . . . . the party boss has become more potent than the legislature, or even the people themselves, in culling Cumulated States Senators in more than …show more content…

A popular vote would not be benign because many people in the US do not appreciate America, the regime is thriving, and the regime has further expertise than the US civilians. A popular vote for America would not be benign because many people in the US do not relish America. In fact, there are auxiliary foreigners coming into the United States persistently. For example, the article foreign students: coming and going says, “The number of foreign students at universities in America reached a new high of 819,644 last year” (The Economist). Furthermore, there have been hundreds of terrorist attacks on America. Many People just come to the US to eradicate it. However, the United States federal administration has kept the constituents safe since

Open Document