Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The atomic bomb and it's impact
Essays about the atomic bomb
Essays about the atomic bomb
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In a matter of minutes, more than 100 thousand lives were lost, and many families would be destroyed forever. Within the next few months no one knew almost 40,000 more lives would be lost from lasting effects on their bodies. The atomic bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, gave almost a clear ending to the war. This may seem like a brutal way to end the war, but by killing those people it saved lives on both the Japanese, and the American sides of the war. Paul Fussell gave us an insight into the war that not many Americans had heard before writing the essay Thank God for the Atom Bomb. All over America, we believed that the bomb was to hurt others and give us an advantage. Fussell helps Americans understand that the bombing was …show more content…
set in place to help people, rather than hurt them. Paul Fussell wasn’t just a reporter that went into the field and interviewed the soldiers, but instead he was one of the soldiers.
More importantly he was also an infantry lieutenant during World War 2. He details his experiences to other authors who have reported about the war, and explains the real truth behind the dropping of the atomic bomb. In his short essay, he is very blunt and straight to the point about everything; not holding anything back from the readers that will be seeing his essay. “Fussell went on to argue that those who did have firsthand experience of World War II combat were “not elaborately educated,” and thus were unlikely to articulate the benefits of dropping the bombs when critics, who had been nowhere near the war’s devastation, heaped scorn on the decision to use atomic bombs on Japan.” (Sternberg, Libby) People still to this day do not believe what United States did what was the right thing but they were only seeing what the media had published and the publicity headlines, not what was actually happening in the battlefield. The Government, carries out actions that the and citizens don’t fully understand the cause and effect system of these …show more content…
decisions. Both sides of this argument are valid. The Japanese were hurt from this because they lost the lives of their people. American’s also have another valid argument, why were we killing those innocent people’s lives, when we could have just continued fighting in the war? Fussell tries to make people understand, it was all for good intentions on both sides. Even though, lives were lost in Japan, if they were to have continued the war, more lives could have been at risk. Together living in this world, we need to stop living as in what might happen, based on we know this will happen and it will stop all of the violence from happening. As we have said many times before in our lives, history repeats itself if we do not learn from it.
We need to get educated, and that is the major reason Fussell wrote this essay, is to inform people and help them learn so that we don’t make the same mistake. Hopefully, in the future. The many places you would not expect to find a life changing phrase, caught Paul’s eye, “In life, experience is the great teacher. In Scotch, Teacher’s is the great experience.” We learn best when we make a mistake, not when doing something right. Sometimes a loss is something no one wants to encounter in their lifetime, but it will always happen, and that makes you a stronger and better person than you were before. For example children, if you tell them to not eat too much candy on Halloween night they will not listen but when they do it themselves and get very sick they will learn a lesson, and they will keep it in their past experiences within their
minds. Our world is consumed by racism, everyone has something to say about everyone; and not everything they say will be bad, also not everything they say will be good. But we let these hurtful words get to us and then it leads to anger in our lives and people act upon that anger rather than brushing it off or confronting the other person/people about it. If we could work our problems out with words or just forgetting the whole thing all together, this world be more of a better place, without violence and hate for our children to grow up in. Racism is very big in wars, and on the battlefield, just because we don’t like the color of their skin, or their beliefs in life, these things should not affect us or the way we are living our own lives. Sometimes war is necessary, but most of the time, it is not. War contributes progress to the world, both financially and politically. Medicine has rapidly increased, because more and more casualties happening in the battlefields. People today are too sensitive, and take everything that others say to heart, and they just need to learn to listen with one ear, and let it go out the other. War is for the serious matters in life, that should not be resolved by just ignoring someone. But we also need to take others opinions and beliefs into consideration, so we do not repeat the past. Sternberg, Libby. "Thank God for the Atom Bomb." Hot Air. N.p., 24 May 2004. Web. 4 Oct. 2015.
The war was coming to a victorious conclusion for the Allies. Germany had fallen, and it was only a matter of time until Japan would fall as well. Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson was at the forefront of the American war effort, and saw atomic weaponry as a way out of the most monumental war ever. As discussed in Cabell Phillips’ book, The Truman Presidency: The History of a Triumphant Succession, Stimson was once quoted as saying that the atomic bomb has “more effect on human affairs than the theory of Copernicus and the Law of Gravity” (55). Stimson, a defendant of dropping the bomb on Japan, felt that the world would never be the same. If the world would change after using atomic weapons, could it possibly have changed for the better? One would think not. However, that person might be weary of the biased opinion of White House personnel. He or she should care more for the in depth analytical studies done by experts who know best as to why America should or should not have dropped the atomic bomb. As more and more evidence has been presented to researchers, expert opinion on whether or not the United States should have dropped the two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki has also changed. More and more researchers seem to feel that the atomic bomb should never have been used (Alperovitz 16). Despite several officials’ claims to enormous death estimations, an invasion of Japan would have cost fewer total lives. In addition, post atomic bomb repercussions that occurred, such as the Arms Race, were far too great a price to pay for the two atomic drops. However, possibly the most compelling argument is that Japan would have surrendered with or without the United States using the atomic bomb. In defiance of top...
Fussell pointed out in his essay that those that opposed the dropping of the Atom Bomb were not of those men going into war and actually fighting. Those people often came from money or some high educational background. They often support the idea that the war was going to end anyway so the dropping of the bomb was extremely unnecessary and killed innocent people. However, as it was stated in the essay that the weeks leading up to the bombing as many as seven thousand soldiers were getting killed or injured every week..
Upon reading “Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs Against Japan” by J. Samuel Walker, a reader will have a clear understanding of both sides of the controversy surrounding Truman’s decision to drop atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. The controversy remains of whether or not atomic bombs should have been used during the war. After studying this text, it is clear that the first atomic bomb, which was dropped on the city of Hiroshima, was a necessary military tactic on ending the war. The second bomb, which was dropped on Nagasaki, however, was an unnecessary measure in ensuring a surrender from the Japanese, and was only used to seek revenge.
Although WW II ended over 50 years ago there is still much discussion as to the events which ended the War in the Pacific. The primary event which historians attribute to this end are the use of atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Although the bombing of these cities did force the Japanese to surrender, many people today ask “Was the use of the atomic bomb necessary to end the war?” and more importantly “Why was the decision to use the bomb made?” Ronald Takaki examines these questions in his book Hiroshima.
We agree that, whatever be one’s judgment of the war in principle, the surprise bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are morally indefensible. The “8 Primary Pros and Cons of Dropping the Atomic Bomb” People also say how Japan was already defeated, concluding why the bombs were unnecessary. Although, many others say that the dropping of the atomic bombs saved their lives, but the debate over the decision to drop the atomic bomb will never be resolved. The war against Japan bestowed the Allies with entirely new problems as they encountered an enemy with utterly unfamiliar tactics.
The United States of America’s use of the atomic bomb on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has spurred much debate concerning the necessity, effectiveness, and morality of the decision since August 1945. After assessing a range of arguments about the importance of the atomic bomb in the termination of the Second World War, it can be concluded that the use of the atomic bomb served as the predominant factor in the end of the Second World War, as its use lowered the morale, industrial resources, and military strength of Japan. The Allied decision to use the atomic bomb not only caused irreparable physical damage on two major Japanese cities, but its use also minimized the Japanese will to continue fighting. These two factors along
The bombings of 1945 by the United States of America on Japan were very controversial events. Many historians believe these acts were aggressive and unnecessary. In addition, analysts argue that the U.S. should have used alternative methods instead of the bomb, but most do not realize the repercussions of these different tactics. On the contrary, the bomb was needed to ease tension quickly and effectively. Ultimately, the bomb proved more effective than any other method, and also proved to be a technique that is sufficient for America’s needs. The effort made by the U.S. to bomb Japan after their disapproval of the Potsdam Declaration was needed to end conflicts in the Pacific because of Japanese resistance, to save American lives, and to portray the U.S. as a nation of power and dominance.
Most writers take sides, either for or against the atom bomb. Instead of taking sides, he challenges his readers to make their own opinions based on their personal meditations. One of the key questions we must ask ourselves is “Are actions intended to benefit the large majority, justified if it negatively impacts a minority?” The greatest atrocity our society could make is to make a mistake and not learn from it. It is important, as we progress as a society, to learn from our mistakes or suffer to watch as history repeats itself.
One of the most argued topics today, the end of World War II and the dropping of the atomic bombs still rings in the American ear. Recent studies by historians have argued that point that the United States really did not make the right choice when they chose to drop the atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Also with the release of once classified documents, we can see that the United States ...
The Atomic Age represents the most epic era and composed of diverse controversial issues in the human history. In the late 1945, President Harry Truman informed to drop two atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These two bombs quickly yielded the surrender of Japan and the end the World War 2. However, the impact of it led us to debate whether this decision was actually right or so. First off, it would be hard to imagine how Japan would have been surrendered without the atomic bomb. Therefore to save many American lives, President Truman believed that it was his duty to end the war as soon as possible. But the bombs took away innocent lives and killed civilians indiscriminately. “Atomic Age America” written by Martin
As World War 2, came to a close, The United States unleashed a secret atomic weapon upon the enemy nation of Japan that was quickly recognized as the most powerful wartime weapon in human history. They completely destroyed the entire Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and essentially vaporized countless innocent Japanese lives. Some historians believe that it was a foolish, brutal decision to use the atomic bomb on a weakened Japan, and that the civilians of the country did not deserve that kind of mass-annihilation. On the opposite side, other historians assert that dropping the bomb saved countless American and Japanese lives by ending the war faster than a regular invasion would have. What is undisputed is that this sad event dramatically changed the course of human history.
“The atomic bomb certainly is the most powerful of all weapons, but it is conclusively powerful and effective only in the hands of the nation which controls the sky” (Johnson 1). Throughout World War II, the war was in pieces. The Germans were almost at world domination along with their allies, the Italians and Japanese. The Japanese and United states had remained at combat with each other since the bombarding of the Pearl Harbor ("U.S. Drops Atomic Bomb on Japan "1). There was abundant controversy as to whether the United States should have used the atomic bombs or not. There were many factors as to the argument relating to the atomic bombs leading to the United States final decision. Many people had arguments for the bombing and others had arguments against the bombings but it is still not determined if the United States made the right decision.
...ings by saying that it saved millions of Americans, but I came to find out that, that wasn’t so true. While looking through many articles, books, and databases, I realized that before getting this assignment I only knew the things that were shared with me about this subject. I knew what everyone wanted me to know and I never questioned it. I believed that if our country were to bomb someone, they’d have justifiable reasons as to why they did it. This event taught me that just because there are a few myths as to why something happened, you don’t have to agree with them. America is my home, but never will I ever agree that the dropping of Little Boy and Fat Man on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary. They could have been avoided and lives could have
When looking at the aftermath of the atomic bomb in both Nagasaki and Hiroshima the devastation it caused is evident. The majority of the population in Japan could have never imagined such a catastrophic event. On August 6, 1945 and August 9, 1945 massive amounts of lives were changed forever when an atomic bomb fell from the sky and created an explosion as bright as the sun. These two bombs were the first and only accounts of nuclear warfare. (“Atomic Bomb is…”) The impact that the two bombs left on the cities of Japan was tremendous. The bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima devastated the country through structural damage, long term medical effects, expenses, and the massive loss of life.
The devastation brought about by the atomic bomb has caused fear among all the people that have realized the potential destructive power of its invention. The atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and 9, 1945 completely obliterated both cities (Lanouette 30). “Little Boy,” the bomb dropped on Hiroshima killed 70,000 people with an additional 66,000 injured (30-39). “Fat Man,” the bomb dropped on Nagasaki also carried its “share of America’s duty” by killing 40,000 people and injuring another 25,000 (30-39). The bombs also killed an estimated 230,000 more people from the after effects of the two explosions (30). The two bombings had opened the world’s eyes to the destructive power that could be unleashed by man.