Analysis Of Octavia Butler's Postmodern Slave Narrative '

1272 Words3 Pages

In his 2004 article “Inverting History in Octavia Butler’s Postmodern Slave Narrative”, Marc Steinberg addresses the concept of cyclical history. Steinberg does this by discussing the different ways “Kindred” suggests that the past and present are interchangeable, and how the past continues to live into the future. He also shows how author Octavia Butler deals with, and critiques the idea that psychological and historical oppression can be overcome. I will be responding to the ideas presented in this article, as well as raising a few points of my own.

Steinberg pays close attention to the notions of time and timelines in his analysis of Butler’s 1979 work. He states that Butler uses a “non-western conceptualization of history” (467), meaning …show more content…

This is shown very clearly when Dana witnesses the children playing a slave auction game and exclaims “It’s nineteen seventy-six cushioning eighteen nineteen for me. But now and then, like with the kid’s game, I can’t maintain the distance” (Butler, 101). This is also shown when Kevin returns to the present after spending five years alone in the antebellum south, and finds he cannot readjust. However, the biggest indicator of a corrupted timeline is the way Butler relates all the white male characters back to each other: Kevin, Rufus, and Tom Weylin have the same accent, the same look in their eyes, the same privileges. Dana connects her husband to her oppressors, perhaps too strongly for her own good. This forces her to realize that, despite being a loving husband, by virtue of his whiteness, Kevin will always be part of the oppressive …show more content…

I would argue that this claim could be expanded to include historical and psychological oppression of any kind, and would still be supported by Butler’s argument that no oppression can truly be overcome. Primarily, Dana deals with being forcibly pulled back in time, which leads to psychological distress and fear that is will happen again. She struggles with the fact that she cannot control this aspect of her life. Then, when it happens again, she is forced into slavery, which, in addition to being another form of lost control, makes her question her sense of self. Additionally, the reader can draw parallels between Dana’s feelings of objectification in 1976, where she is treated as an anomaly for being in an interracial marriage, and in 1819, where as a female slave she is literally treated like an object, worth no more to the overseer than a workhorse. Dana brings this psychological baggage back with her every time she returns to the relative present, as well as physical damage: whip scars, a beaten and bloody face, and slit wrists, coming to a head after her final return, where she loses her entire forearm. This loss of a limb symbolizes Dana’s inability to escape the horrors of her past, as she has a constant reminder of what she and her ancestors went through to get to where she is

Open Document