Analysis Of Nature Vs. Nurture

Physical features are the traits that you can see at first glance. They are your eyes, nose, ears, mouth and more. These body parts are influenced and molded by generations of DNA that has passed down from one individual to another. Therefore, resemblances with your parents are noticeable. Consequently a person’s humor, dreams, and interests are different story. These things are the bases on what make each and every one of us unique. In the studies of psychology, people debate whether these traits are influences by your DNA or that it is absorbed by your experiences throughout life (Sincero). Psychologists call this the Nature vs Nurture (Sincero). Each Argument has made valid and accurate points that make it difficult to decide (Sincero).

However, most researchers agree that personality and talents may have come not from your father or mother. Furthermore, the environment in which a person grows up may have a more lasting effect or influence on the way they talk, behave, and respond to the things around them.
Nature
Nature, the more scientific theory of the two, is the belief that inborn traits found in our genetic factor make us who we are (Nature vs. Nurture). This is credible but not conclusive when we study the theory of nurture (Nature vs. Nurture). Human beings learn new things
Uy 2
every day. As soon as we come in to the world, our learning process begins (Nature vs. Nurture Essay). As a baby, we gradually absorb and adjust in order to survive in a new atmosphere (Nature vs. Nurture). The household setting, parents and siblings, play a significant part in determining personality (Nature vs. Nurture). Influences from outside the family are also very important to the development of one’s personality. But everything starts at home (Nature vs. Nurture).
However, scientists have argued that there are genes in our DNA that morally influence our traits.

An example of this trait is called the Gay gene (Sincero). This discovery solidifies the argument of the Nature Theory. It states that this gene is imbedded in the genetic code of homosexuals and that explains that gays are actually born that way. Consequently, this fact isn’t truly valid. According to Michael Bailey, a psychologist at Northwestern University in Illinois, 33 out of 40 gay participants only carry this gene (Bindel). This just shows that genetic traits of social behavior cannot account to all human

qualities.
Another study that backs up the genetic transferal of behavior traits is the experiment of the twins. Nick Collins, a Science Correspondent of telegraph.co.uk, states that this experiment determines nature not nurture is in control for creating our personality (Collins). Scholars from Edinburgh University experimented with more than 800 sets of identical and non-identical twins to study whether genetics or background has a greater effect on how successful individuals are in life (Collins). Applicants were questioned a series of inquiries about how

Uy 3
they see themselves and others, such as "are you influenced by people with strong opinions (Collins)?" The academics found that identical twins were more likely compare to non-identical twins to share the same behavior traits, suggesting that their genes was contributing a greatest impact on them (Collins). However this experiment proves to be unacceptable because of it was conducted on the identical and non-identical twins who live together under the same roof (Collins). This cannot disprove the argument of the Nurture theory because of the lack of different environments (Collins). One twin can just be influenced by another’s ideology because they were raised in the same environment.

Nurture
While Nature theories believe that trait’s influence is imbedded in our body, Nurture theories believe that our environment just enhances those DNA, which in turn create our unique personalities (Sincero). The nurture theory holds that genetic influence over abstract traits may exist; however, the environmental factors are the real origins of our behavior (Sincero). This includes the use of conditioning in order to induce a new behavior to a child, or alter an unlikely behavior being shown by the child (Sincero).
Uy 4
John Watson, well-respected psychologists states that even though the scientists make a good point about genes that physical aspects come through genetics, but that personality development is shaped based solely on how a person has been nurtured through their lives (Sincero).

His example is “All children are bad at one time in their lives; consider this; a 4 year old girl throws a book at her brother, and is punished by being put in the corner” (Sincero). “She doesn't like being made to stay in the corner, but she should be able to put two and two together and learn that throwing books is wrong” (Sincero). Conditions like so represent to us how easily children learn and are influenced by other people (Sincero). This displays the development in which humans absorb the influences that’s surrounds them. Which conveying us to the Theory of Nurture, learning things is what makes people who they are.

In the novel, Not My Fathers Son by Alan Cumming, the brothers were raise by a strict and abusive father. In Alan’s memoirs, his father would discipline him and made him work harder than he should; however, this action contributed to his character of being a person who works hard and puts his efforts towards his passion (Alan 50). Furthermore, he was robbed of his childhood which made his adult life trying to regain what he had lost (Alan 78). This made Alan develop more of a child life personality. This just shows that a person’s environment can greatly influences his or her

characteristics.

The importance of Nurture Theory shows more of an impact towards our understanding of our behavior. Without the influence of the environment our culture, personality, and ideology would not make us unique. Therefore, a person’s character isn’t defined by his / her DNA but the actions and influences that surround them.