Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Chesterfield's Letters to His Son
Chesterfield's Letters to His Son
Lord chesterfield letter to son analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Chesterfield's Letters to His Son
In this letter, written by Lord Chesterfield to his traveling son, Lord Chesterfield shows his son the values he holds and the expectations he has for him. Lord Chesterfield clearly shows he values working hard, being superior to others, and doing what is right and noble. He informs his son these values are what are expected of him and anything less would be considered shameful. Lord Chesterfield organizes his letter by beginning with words that portray him as a friend and as show him to be comprehensive. He even relates his own youth with that of his son to show understanding. He later transforms his tone to be more assertive and describes to his son his expectations and the consequences of failure. In the beginning of his letter Lord Chesterfield …show more content…
This transition, or shift, can be found in the line, “I do not, therefore, so much as hint to you, how absolutely dependent you are upon me.” This line precisely, while indicating the shift in tone from understanding to assertive, shows that Lord Chesterfield means to tell his son that his advice should be taken as expectations rather than suggestions. The first expectation Chesterfield mentions is that he is “convince that you will act right, upon more noble and generous principles”. Consequently, from asserting this first Lord Chesterfield is attempting to show that he expects his son to be noble above all. This also highlights how important nobility is to Lord Chesterfield. Lastly another consequence from Chesterfield making it a point to tell his son that he expects him to act right upon noble principles is that he leaves room to later describe these noble principles. Next Lord Chesterfield brings to light another expectation he has for his son. He says that there can be no greater pleasure than “to be universally allowed to excel those of one’s own age and manner of life”. By exemplifying that this is something he has come to expect from his son Chesterfield is showing that being superior to his peers is valuable to him. Even Lord Chesterfield’s tone seems to suggest hierarchy and the importance of where your place is in that hierarchy. He has, after the shift in tone, developed a tone that makes him seem higher and superior to his son. Another benefit of Lord Chesterfield adopting this new tone is the ability it has in making consequences seem more severe. Chesterfield takes full advantage of this and expresses to his son that, because of the tools
Falstaff’s speech is highly typical of the tavern world’s way of thinking: straightforward, sometimes humorous, spoken in prose, and only the values of the tavern world taken into consideration, with no regard for such insubstantial, un-physical concepts as honour. In this way, and speaking directly to the audience, Falstaff effectively expresses his unashamed resolution not to submit to moral order.
Meant to be full of worship and goodness, the Church is represented as an emotionless and fearful institution. By doing this, King overall shames the clergymen for their lack of action which adds tension towards what is being addressing in the letter. The juxtaposition is used to induce guilt support towards King’s credibility as a leader in nonviolent direct action.
Showing that, not everything that is legal is fair and just, and that people have a responsibility to go against these unjust laws.... ... middle of paper ... ... He uses this letter in order to persuade the clergymen to understand his reasons for all the above.
In the first section of the letter, Crevecoeur mainly appeals to pathos and logos. By appealing to pathos, Crevecoeur evokes emotion, specifically evoking a sense of pride. He also appeals to logos in order to show his reasoning and thoughts about why America is a better place to live than England. In the middle of the section, Crevecoeur says, “Can a wretch who wanders about, who works and starves, whose life is a continual scene of sore affliction or pinching penury; can that man call England or any other kingdom his country?”.
The tone of the letter changed as you got more in-depth. Beginning the letter, King was respectful to the clergymen because he acknowledged that he did not usually answer to criticism, but since they were good men, he would
Oliver Cromwell was an English peasant who became one of the most influential, effective and controversial leaders ever to rule England. A great military leader, he ultimately overthrew the King and, for the first time, changed his country from a monarchy to a Republic. Despite the fact that he was a strong leader, Cromwell’s goal and achievement of eliminating the monarchy did not last long after his death. Oliver Cromwell was and remains a controversial figure in history, reviled by many and revered by many others.
He sought, in Hamlet’s telling words to his palace players, “to hold the mirror up to nature,” and to report what he saw in that mirror – even his own veiled image – without distortion. “Life is made up,”, Hawthorne said, “of marble and mud.” In the pages of his finest works, both marble and mud are held in a just, unique, and artistic balance(95).
The last two centuries have been full of drastic changes in the human condition. Today, we tend to overlook just how drastic those changes were. Britain during the late 18th Century provides an excellent example because both the Industrial Revolution and the French Revolution were chipping away at the established social order. In Britain, the aristocracy had ruled in relative stability since the medieval period. There were power struggles but the ideology of privilege remained untouchable. British society considered privilege a reward for refinement and expected a gentleman to distinguish himself by following a specific code of conduct. However, his duty and honor depended on more than a code; he also had to feel sympathy for the weaker sex and the lower classes and know when to act accordingly. This sensibility made him “gentle” and a just participant in the governing process. In the 1790’s and 1800’s these gentlemanly ideals were eroding. Yet, while the British did not guillotine their nobles like the French did, many still said that rapid change could unravel the delicate balance of society perpetuated by a refined nobility. The rise of merchants and industrialists into the ranks of the upper class graphically illustrated a shift toward individual success and the selfish ideology of capitalism. Gentlemen through birth and education were losing ground to these nouveaux-rich and consequently the ruling class disconnected further from their communities.
Chesterfield, Lord. Lord Chesterfield's Letters (Oxford World's Classics). Oxford: Oxford University Press, USA, 2008. Print.
The reading of the letter creates comedy the requests are outrageous. Malvolio is told to wear yellow cross-gartered stockings "to be opposite with kinsman, surly with servants" and to constantly smile. The thought of this is hilarious considering that Malvolio is a strict puritan and is very malice towards others.
England has given him birth, her "flowers", "ways to roam", "air", "rivers" and "suns" and made him like every other English person: special, privileged and worthy. In the line "In that rich earth, a richer dust concealed," his is the "richer dust", made by England. Here his physical being created and nurtured by England is gratefully returned to her. His appreciation and gratitude to England ring sincerity as reflected by h... ... middle of paper ... ...
Oliver Cromwell was a well known military dictator. He helped the Parliamentarians win the First Civil War and was named Lord Protector. He died in 1658 but many people still remember him as one of the best leaders in history although others believe he was a harsh tyrant and always wanted too much power for himself. Throughout the years, numerous historians have changed their views on whether he was a good leader or not. This work will look at three interpretations from different people on who Cromwell was and what he was like and compare them.
In spite of the weaknesses, Ivanhoe and King Richard demonstrate true chivalric characteristics. They exemplify integrity, loyalty to the king, a love for adventure and bravery. Through this book, the reader learns the meaning of moral guidelines due to the examples set by King Richard and Ivanhoe. These examples challenge us to search for our own moral guidelines. Without these, we have nothing to strive for.
In conclusion, Charles Dickens, a social critic of humble origins himself, has conveyed his conception of a true gentleman, which is such a good conception that it is commonly used in our society today. He shows that you can only be a true gentleman at heart and if you are not it will be revealed. Matthew Pocket’s metaphor that ‘No varnish can hide the grain of the wood; and that the more varnish you put on, the more the grain will express itself’ very successfully delivers and summarises Dickens’ message, that no matter how much you try to, your true identity will always be revealed. It also effectively reinforces Dickens’ treatment of the Victorian preconception of a gentleman as misconstrued and mistakenly engrossed with social status, wealth, birth, and apparel.
The Speaker in ‘My Last Duchess’ is conversing with the servant of a count whose daughter he is proposing to marry. He treats t...