Analysis Of Globalization: Two Visions Of The Future Of Humanity

Globalization Globalization is an interesting issue that concerns researchers and scientists around the world. Although there are obvious differences in cultures, religious believes and traits, people share technology and they travel to different places all the time. Today, the world is more globalized than before, but the question is it going to become more and more globalized? By using social media and by transportation, a person happens to be more acquainted of other people’s cultures and believes. Being acknowledged and interacting with other people and having the access to see global issues, make most of people add to their cultures some characteristics from different cultures, causing a little bit of a change in their principles, that

There are two visions in Gleiser’s essay, and he illustrates them using the rhetorical strategy division and classification. His point here is not to compare and contrast between the visions, but he sets them there in order to show his argument. Gleiser basically divides the two visions by starting the essay with saying “On the one hand, the shrinking of our planet due to increased speeds of travel, trade and Internet exchange all contribute to create a true global village. On the other, due to deeply ingrained human traits, cultural differences and distrust for those outside our "tribe" remain entrenched”. Those visions are the finest world, which is utopian, and the worse world, which is dystopian. I do not believe that differences in culture and believes would make the world dystopian, the world could live peacefully despite the

Which obviously leads us to his argument about the future of globalization. Then he makes a statement saying, “Globalization, understood as representing the vanishing of cultural and value barriers, is unattainable due to our evolved tribal natures” he is signifying that we are changing in our cultures and believes, but we are creating more characters that separate us from others’ cultures. At the same time we share some concerns like controlling disease and war that might lead the world to be united more and more. Like what Gleiser thinks, it is hard to for most people to lose the basics or the stronger believes in their cultures, when he implies “One of the most obvious and terrifying responses to tendencies of cultural merging is the upsurge of fundamentalism”. However, he does not state the fact that people are becoming more understanding of other peoples’ faiths. Gleiser illustrates more of his argument, that cultures’ characteristics are more leading to a dystopian world, by saying that, “Humans have evolved in tribes and are still tribal” He thinks that the world to go under some sort unification in order to be globalized, by saying “The challenge is to reinvent our tribal make-up” The essence of Gleiser‘s argument, as he finalizes his work