Analysis Of George Handerly's Essay 'Necessary Stupidity'

715 Words2 Pages

In George Handerly’s essay Necessary Stupidity?, he posits that there are no necessary evils, and that all evils, such as greed, war, lying, social inequality, or ineffective government, can be abandoned as the human race gains wisdom and education. I conjecture that George Handerly was wrong --I conjecture that these constructs are necessary, evil or not. Greed, by definition, is “intense and selfish desire for something”, and many would agree that it is the driving force behind every man made event in history. Adolf Hitler, for example, had excessive greed for power and for purity, while your average elementary school teacher is greedy for knowledge, and, most likely, the love of their students. (They are certainly not in it for the money.) In Greed is Good, the money-grabbing experiment showed the way humans adapt to their situation, using their greed-- when they learned they’d make more cash by leaving some money in the bowl, the subjects left money in the bowl. Likewise, in Mrs. Warrens Profession, every character is motivated to some extent by greed: Mrs. Warren, a greed for money and power over her daughter; George Crofts, a greed for a wife; Praed, a greed for beauty; Frank, a greed for love; Vivie, a …show more content…

For the matter of ineffective government, I would posit that there really is no such thing as a government that does its job well. If ineffective is defined as “not strong”, or “having no effect”, we must observe that the ineffective government of America under the Articles of Confederation and the effective government under modern day Russia both have the same issues in the form of angry citizens, protests, and killings. Since government is necessary to rein in chaos (though not to a complete degree, since we have angry citizens, protests, and killings, still), ineffective government is thus

Open Document