Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Fathers character essay
Fathers character essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Fathers character essay
Innocent until proven guilty is a daily motto in our governing societies that can either deliver freedom or harsh punishment. While reading and watching doubt it seemed as though the thought of innocence never crossed sister A’s mind. The evidence that has been presented to sister A includes, meetings with Father Flynn, alcohol on his breath and many others. However in my opinion I see Father Flynn as righteous and just man and that is what I’m going to argue in this paper.
Early on in the book John Patrick Shanley provides us a hint at Father Flynn’s innocence with his peculiar nails. While teaching the boys how to play basketball in the rectory he stops after noticing some of the boys with dirty nails. Thus he begins to share the state
…show more content…
The scenes about the toy, the camping trip and the undershirt cause much confusion; causing the audience to go back and forth in their minds and doubt Father Flynn. One of the most likely reasons for these scenes is that Father Flynn feels for Donald because he is less fortunate than others. Consequently resulting in spending time with Donald and having chats with Donald. Father Flynn declares that “ I’m going to have to remove him from the alter boys now which is precisely what I was trying to avoid." ( Shanley 34). To me this represents the good nature of Father Flynn’s personality. He is simply looking out for Donald Muller and his future. Further on in the story Flynn tells Sister James “ There is no substance to any of this. The most innocent actions can seem guilty to a poisoned mind”( Shanley 40). I consider this quote to be another hint showing Father Flynn’s innocent evidence. Sister A is portrayed as a ruthless woman who runs the school with an iron fist. Compared to Father Flynn she is not well liked and considered mean. One could argue that jealousy led to the claim that tarnished Father Flynn’s name and reputation. What would be a better way to get rid of someone then create a sense of danger that surrounds
...idence in the conviction of Melanie McGuire. According to Champod (2004), Beth Dunton may have skipped important steps necessary to collecting fingerprints from the trash bags. If fingerprints had been collected from the trash bags, this could have cleared Melanie or added to the mountain of evidence against her. According to Rossmo (2009), all of the circumstantial evidence gathered by investigators could have been declared coincidental. There was no “smoking gun” to convict Melanie. Despite possible errors, the investigative team was successful in remaining free of bias being that the evidence collected by two different investigative teams led to Melanie McGuire as the suspect and ultimately to her conviction. Human error is inevitable while conducting investigation, but ultimately a jury of peers found Melanie McGuire guilty of the alleged crimes (Glatt, 2008).
The play is pretty clear that Father Flynn is innocent. Father Brendan Flynn is a very conservative priest, who wants to help the students. He also tried to make changes such that student would use ball pen and sing frosty the snowman. In the other hand, Sister Aloysius is a progressive nun, who does not like the school to change. Father Flynn caught Donald drinking wine, and to save the boy from getting discharged as an altar boy, he made a promise to Donald to not to tell anyone. Sister Aloysius drove Father Flynn to the point that he had to tell the truth about Donald drinking the altar wine. The church will now have to discharge Donald as an altar boy, which Father Flynn had been trying to avoid this entire time. Before leaving Sister Aloysius’s office, Father Flynn tells her that, “He is displeased with her handling of the situation.”(Shanley 35)
The clip ‘Trouble with Evan’ narrates the struggle of a boy named Evan that puts his stepdad Mike and his mother Karen through stress because of his ill manners. Despite him being at a tender age of 11 years and in 6th grade, his mannerism is worrying because he is already engaging in morally unacceptable activities such as shoplifting, smoking, and gross disobedience, bullying other children and even stealing from his parents. Therefore, this puts his parents under severe psychological stress as they try to figure where their parenting is going wrong in a bid together to make him grow morally upright (Henning, 2016). Evan’s behavior was also straining his relationship with his parents and this stressed the parents as they tried to figure out different ways in which they could once again improve their relationship with their son. In addition, the clip revolves around trying to uncover the mystery as to what could be causing Evan’s unacceptable behavior.
Another scene I believe is important that is missing from the play is the scene where sister James sees Father Flynn putting the white t-shirt back in the locker which is pivotal to the whole premise of the story, without Sister James seeing that she would have never brought it up to Sister Alyosius and we would been left to question Sister Alysosius’s accusations even more.
A reputation can be so well established that if one person in power does a wrongdoing people will not believe it. For example when Mrs. Muller says, “Let me ask you something. You honestly think that priest gave Donald that wine to drink?” (47). Donald’s mother is questioning sister Aloysius because she does not believe Father Flynn would do something like that. He has a reputation of being a great priest and his reputation is better than Sister Aloysius’. Mrs. Muller states, “You’re not going against no man in a robe and win, Sister. He’s got the position.” (47). Just by Father Flynn being a male he has a higher reputation than a nun, which he knows and can accumulate for his actions. In the hierarchy of the Church, the head male priest is the most dominant. Therefore, nobody questions what he is doing; he has a reputation of being this influential priest who gives great sermons. He knows that he has the power to do what he wants and has his fellow Monsignor and other men in the ...
... Nonetheless, the signs also point to Father Flynn hurting him, because he was violating him. People’s assumptions are based upon personal experience and gut feeling, also on their upbringing; nature and nurture. Shanley uses inference in this play to create doubt in the audience’s minds'. The verdict is never in, on Flynn; guilty or not guilty. Shanley’s audience is left to be the jury.
Phil did not grow up with his father, his father out of nowhere just abandoned him. Where Phil never did hear about him ever again. In his book, The Brief and Frightening Reign of Phil, George Saunders maintains that “Then he remembered the dark days after his father left, when suddenly there was more room to get the refrigerator open but no reason to open it, since there was never anything inside. Why had Dad left? Phil knew very well why”( Saunders 105). Saunders’s point is that Phil’s dad had left him and he never saw him after the day he had left but Phil did know the reason why he had decided to leave him. In this case, phil knew exactly for why his father left him. Another reason for why Phil does not like the Inner Hornerites is because he blames them for why his dad left him because the Inner Hornerites Humiliating his dad. Whereas, in a real life situation kids are getting abandoned by their parents, leaving them with nothing but for them to take care of themselves. Three children in the city of Englewood in Chicago were left alone by their parents. In David Cera’s view “The officers were doing a wellness check last month in the Englewood neighborhood when they found the three children -- ages 1, 2 and 7 -- now known as the ‘Englewood angels.’ The girls had been left alone in an abandoned house” (N.p).
There are many ways to decide what makes a man guilty. In an ethical sense, there is more to guilt than just committing the crime. In Charles Brockden Browns’ Wieland, the reader is presented with a moral dilemma: is Theodore Wieland guilty of murdering his wife and children, even though he claims that the command came from God, or is Carwin guilty because of his history of using persuasive voices, even though his role in the Wieland family’s murder is questionable? To answer these questions, one must consider what determines guilt, such as responsibility, motives, consequences, and the act itself. No matter which view is taken on what determines a man’s guilt, it can be concluded that Wieland bears the fault in the murder of Catharine Wieland and her children.
evidence and the right of a condemned man to ask for testing.("A.B. Butler").He was exonerated by
Heather McHugh was born in San Diego, California on August 20, 1948. McHugh was raised in Gloucester Point, Virginia, by her two Canadian parents, Eileen Francesca and John Laurence, a marine biologist, he worked on the York River directing the laboratory. Heather McHugh had an early teaching on the emphasis on grammar at a young age by nuns at parochial school. At the age of five, Heather was writing poetry and at age twelve was an excellent eavesdropper. Heather McHugh attended Yorktown High School in Virginia before moving on to Harvard at the age of 17, where she attended a seminar with Robert Lowell and had her first poem published in The New Yorker. In 1970, after receiving her Bachelor's Degree from Harvard, Heather McHugh moved onto
Jimmy, later in the novel “Snowman,” lives perhaps the most detailed, and intensive childhood of the three characters. It is his childhood that also foreshadows the most within his adult life. Jimmy grew up an only child to his parents, whose relationship was bearable at most. Jimmy’s relationship with his parents was one of skepticism and disappointment, and only occasionally would he long for their presence. His father, a genographer at OrganInc, the corporation that owned the compound on which they lived, was absent in his affection towards Jimmy throughout the entirety of their relationship, leaving a negative mark on Jimmy himself. The father figure image, which Jimmy’s father attempted so desperately to embody, was transparent to Jimmy and led him to increase the distance between himself and his father. Jimmy’s mother, originally a biochemist at OrganInc alongside Jimmy’s father, possessed mood swings and nearly constant pessimism towards the rest of her family thus creating a large distance between
In Louis H. Sullivan’s article, “Thought,” he claims that our thoughts aren’t our own, but that they’re thoughts that other people have had. Sullivan’s article hits many points such as how the mind thinks, the written or spoken language, forms of communication etc. From discussing if we think in images or with words. He believes that people only need words as a spoken language but there are other ways to express yourself as well. He uses the example of music, painting and sculpture that are other ways of expressing yourself also by gestures or facial expression. How can our thoughts belong to someone else? Sometimes we do think alike with other people but our mind developed it on its own. Throughout his writing he claims that the things we
...der further than what we have in front of us. We want to impose our opinion on everything. We want to relate to it in a way that can only be done through out imagination. So, due to this, when we are not given the flexibility, then the context no longer becomes entertaining. The viewers do not want to be told how to think. Given these points, if they are influenced to believe that Sister Aloysius is a cruel individual like the movie portrays, then at the end of the movie and book when Sister Aloysius says, “ I have doubts! I have such doubts!” they will take that as a confession from her, and be further lead to believe that the accusations against Father Flynn are false. I think John Patrick Shanley chooses specific diction to create a conflict that has no precise resolution,he wanted the reader get lost in story and enter into their own story manifested within.
In the play “Doubt, a Parable” John Patrick Shanley does a remarkable job constructing a play that leaves his audience with doubt throughout the play from when the beginning till the end. The relationship between Father Flynn and Sister Aloysius is a back and forth conflict between certainty and doubt.
One reason Father Flynn is innocent is because he is a kindhearted man. First, he is not guilty of an improper relationship with Donald Muller because priests are supposed to care for others. If somebody is in need of advice, people should trust the priest and be able to go to him for words of wisdom. However, Sister Aloysius questions the extent of the priests kindness and follows strict church