Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Bullet in the brain critical analysis
Bullet in the brain main points
Bullet in the brain critical analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Our days are filled with a constant stream of decisions. Most are mundane, but some are so important that they can haunt you for the rest of your life.” Travis Bradberry. It is interesting how little decisions people make everyday can change their life. Such is the case of Anders in “Bullet to the Brain” whose love of words and his hatred of the mundane cause him to make bad decisions. The combination of these two elements of his life contribute directly to his being shot. People need to read this story in their twenties, because in a person’s twenties they think that they have life figured out and that nothing can hurt them. This story shows that in reality how a person treats others and the words they chose to use can kill them, because life is not always mundane and predictable. Tobias Wolff in the short story “Bullet to the Brain” creates a character Anders that people can relate to because everyone knows someone like Anders. Anders feels superior to other people and feels as if people are boring and predictable. Anders uses his vast vocabulary to make others feel inferior. He uses exaggerations to make the lady in front of him feel like she is …show more content…
overreacting even though he agrees with her and is just as frustrated with the teller closing. “Anders had conceived his own towering hatred for the teller…” He uses his love of words to mask his hatred of the mundane. He compares the teller closing early to “...bombing an ancestral village.” This characterization makes a reader not really care what happens to him. However, Anders being shot in the head and the last thought he has makes you feel sorry for him in a way. Unfortunately, his behavior prior to his being shot proves to be his undoing. When the bank is robbed and Anders views the robbery as an ordinary event that is following a bad movie script he lets his mouth get the better of him. Anders makes fun of the robber’s lack of original dialog and draws attention to himself. He mistakenly thinks that them being uncreative is mundane and ridiculous so they would be less lethal. Anders felt superior to the robbers in that their words and actions were boring and predictable, so that led him to be cocky when talking to them. “When the robber with the pistol says “capiche’ he laughs at him which is the reason he is shot. Once the bullet enters his brain the reader is given incite into Anders mundane life. The author uses this in order to get the reader to feel some sort of sympathy for Anders. It is then that the reader can see why Anders felt his life was ordinary. None of the major events in his life were important enough to think of as he is dying. He does not think of his wife or his children as he is dying. His entire adult life has had nothing exciting happen in it. It is sad that he found everything in life so boring and predictable. That gives the reader incite into what type of person he is and why he is the way he is. There is a line about Anders intentionally “crashing his father’s car into a tree”. This tells the reader that Anders just wanted to feel something real. It is sad that in his whole life he did not have any exciting and joyful moments. The only time he felt true excitement and joy was when his cousin breaks from the mundane and uses incorrect grammar. This story is important for twenty-year old’s to read, because they think they got everything figured out and nothing can hurt them. A person’s twenties are a time of freedom and thinking they know more than any other adult. That viewpoint tends to make people feel like nothing can ever hurt them. Twenty somethings view life as a big game and do not consider consequences and today twenty somethings view life as a movie with no basis in reality. There are several examples of those behaviors in the story “Bullet in the Brain” Anders failed to realize the danger of the situation throughout the entire story. People in their twenties do not realize that life is not a game and that actions have consequences. This story is full of examples of what twenty somethings should learn from this story. When the robbers first enter and take hostages Anders immediately make fun of their predictable language, “Dead meat.” He is angered that they are using such predictable language. He refers to their language as “The stern, brass-knuckled poetry of the dangerous classes.” This is an example of how thinking you are invincible can cause you to act irrationally and cause you to make bad decisions. By opening his mouth and commenting on the vocabulary of the robbers Anders draws attention to himself. That is not something a normal person would want to do. The rest of the bystanders kept to themselves, but not Anders. He always seems to have the last word. When the robbers focus their attention on the teller that angered everyone in the beginning of the story and talk bad to her he calmly tells the lady in front of him “Justice is done.” He is not taking the robbery seriously. Anders appears to view this entire robbery as a game. He does not recognize the danger that they are all in. A rational man would have been afraid, but he feels that this is all just a big game and people do not normally die in a bank robbery. Once again this calls attention to himself. This time the gunman addresses him directly. He then uses his love of words to make fun of the gunman directly. This is how his love of words leads to his death, because it makes him a target. His hatred for the mundane plays a part in his death in that when looking at the ceiling he starts to notice everyday things in the painting that he never noticed before. He finds it funny how the artists gave the cow and the bull different features that made their intentions toward each other know. He sees this as predictable and funny so that causes him to laugh. This leads the robber to ask what he is laughing at. This altercation ends with him laughing at the use of the word capiche. Capiche is a word that Anders considered predictable in this situation so he cannot control his laughter. His laughing at the robber for his use of the word capiche is the direct cause of the robber shooting him. How a person treats others can have consequences in life.
Anders thought that he could say or do whatever he chose without anything happening to him. Just because people have a love for language and chose to expand their vocabulary they should not use it to belittle others and they need to realise that life is not always mundane and predictable. People who are missing things in life can focus on things that they can master such as language. By mastering that it makes a person feel superior to others with a lower vocabulary, but that does not feel the hole of what is missing in their life. The old saying that “words can never hurt you” did not take into account that the things you do and say to other people can cause them to hurt you. That is a lesson that every person needs to learn not just young
people.
High School as teenagers as the century was about to turn, they could have easily morphed into Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris, taking innocent lives in a society that breeds contempt – if looking for it.
In “The Brain on trial”, David Eagleman (2011) recounts the horrifying events which occurred on August 1, 1966. Charles Whitman entered the University of Texas with a rifle and secured himself in the bell tower. He then proceeded to shoot and kill 13 people and injure 32 more. Whitman was also shot and killed; however, during his autopsy it was discovered that a tumor was pressing against his amygdala. According to Eagleman, “The amygdala is involved in emotional regulation, especially of fear and aggression” (2011). Therefore, Whitman was possibly experiencing a fundamental change in his emotions and personality due to the tumor. Though Whitman did not survive, his case still poses questions as to whether or not he should be held accountable for his actions; moreover, should Whitman have received the maximum punishment for the murder he committed? Charles Whitman may not have had control over the feelings of “rage and irrational thoughts” (2011) he was experiencing; however, the precision of the attack indicates he was well aware of the actions he was committing.
Everything is criticized at every level in this story, the people by the main character, the main character by the author and even the story by the author as well. The cruel egoistic personality of Anders is definitely identifiable through these different levels of criticism. I will prove that the inner motivation of this behaviour derives from Anders' egoistic personality which sometimes makes him cruel against others, sometimes against himself. Furthermore, I will prove that whenever Anders criticizes somebody or something he actually tries to punish because of the imperfectness of the object. In order to make the referring to the different part of the story easier I divide it into three parts. The first part ends when the robbers appear at the door of the bank, the second ends when one of the robbers shoots at Anders and the left is the third part.
I also hope to look at it in a nature vs. nurture aspect. In the end I hope to come away more enlightened and educated on the topic of psychosis and violence as seen through the literary analysis of “In Cold Blood”, by Truman Capote.
“The shots were coming fast. I was afraid. I forgot the password. Then one of Toto’s bullets hit me on my leg and I remembered. I yelled out the password and he stopped shooting.” (Pg. 90 The Missing Piece). The guards are so young and so afraid that they begin shooting before they know if the person is an enemy or a friend. The gradual lack of shock they show at seeing death and murder clearly shows their loss of innocence . “The one who shot at him. He was tall and skinny and looked barely sixteen” (Pg. 100 The Missing Piece) The youth in these guards who are supposed to be trained killers expresses the horrible things that are happening and how the experiences they are facing are teaching them that war is natural. However, even with all the corruption they are being exposed to, some can still enjoy the little things life offers. “Thats Raymond, Who loves leaves shaped like butterflies.” ( Pg. 104 The Missing Piece). Raymond who has seen the awful and horrific sights of the aftereffects of war still enjoys life’s gifts like the leaves, which not only shows his youth, but how even after he has experienced a loss of innocence that he can still appreciate other things in his
Liam O’Flaherty’s realistic fiction story, “The Sniper,” takes place in Dublin, Ireland, where there is a civil war waging between Republicans and Free Staters. The Republican sniper, who is the main character in the story, is fighting in the civil war for the Republican organization. There are numerous amounts of people who are attempting to assassinate the sniper because of his organization, and his enemies are located all around him waiting patiently until they gain their chance. The Republican sniper, however, leaps before he looks most times, thus leading to severe consequences throughout the story. By using description and suspense, O’Flaherty creates the lesson that actions, without thought, will lead to consequences.
A required reading list should consist of books that present readers with new insights and knowledge while encouraging them to analyze the context of the book and identify major themes. Truman Capote 's In Cold Blood should be kept on high school required reading lists because it appropriately covers each of these criteria. The non-fiction novel introduces readers to a world of criminal psychology, raising questions about the cause and manner of American crime. Additionally, the book 's author is steeped in controversy regarding his faithfulness to the truth, providing an excellent opportunity for high school readers to research and discuss the role biases play in the writing of a novel. Meeting the final criterion, In Cold Blood contains Two that stand out as major themes are the loss of innocence and mental illness.
After hearing a brief description of the story you might think that there aren’t many good things about they story. However, this is false, there are many good things in this book that makes it a good read. First being that it is a very intriguing book. This is good for teenage readers because often times they don’t willingly want to read, and this story will force the teenage or any reader to continue the book and continue reading the series. Secondly, this is a “good” book because it has a good balance of violence. This is a good thing because it provides readers with an exciting read. We hear and even see violence in our everyday life and I believe that it is something teenagers should be exposed to. This book gives children an insig...
Not all humans experience these life altering events in the same way. A combination of psychiatric and psychologic theories can be applied to the life of David Berkowitz form his violent experiences as a young adult to his neglect from mother figure throughout childhood. It can be said that a combination of these factors experienced throughout his life, led the Son of Sam killer to lash out his frustration on innocent victims in order to receive relief from a buildup of years of aggressive violent thoughts and
As typical human beings we all want to know why someone could randomly take the lives of several innocent people all at one time. It is frightening and scientists figure if they can figure out why, then it can be prevented in the future. The documentary, Mind of a Rampage Killer, tries to solve the mystery and really dive deep into the minds of people who could potentially create such a horrifying situation. Through the use of ethos, logos, and pathos, this documentary concludes that every killer had something in common; they all struggled with mental disorders, depression, or outbursts of violence, all stemming from early childhood or an internal battle throughout growing up, some could have even just been born with a violent rage.
Protected by a cocoon of naiveté, Holden Caulfield, the principal character in the novel, The Catcher in the Rye, therapeutically relates his lonely 24 hour stay in downtown New York city, experiencing the "phony" adult world while dealing with the death of his innocent younger brother. Through this well-developed teenage character, JD Salinger, uses simple language and dialogue to outline many of the complex underlying problems haunting adolescents. With a unique beginning and ending, and an original look at our new society, The Catcher in the Rye is understood and appreciated on multiple levels of comprehension. The book provides new insights and a fresh view of the world in which adolescents live.
When it comes to death, everyone has a different perspective about it. One might think death is just a beginning, a key to open the door to the afterlife. A release, a way out to a different world. Others might think that death is simply a lesson of life. It teaches one not to waste his or her time but live to enjoy it, while it still last. Live and do whatever one desire before time runs out. Surely, death has many different purposes and meanings. In the short story “Bullet in the Brain” by Tobias Wolff. He uses death as a flashback and a final thought to show the reader the character’s life in the story. In the “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” by Ambrose Bierce, he uses death to teach the reader that one should stand up and protect the
Many people believe Tobias Wolff is considered much of a critic mainly because his childhood was affected by his parent’s separation. Little by little, he started to become like a critic until he went to the army. Furthermore, when he came back he became more pessimistic than critical some might say. His short stories are acknowledged by many readers because of the true meaning of aspirations some people could think they can make out of it. Some say Wolff created a new thinking perspective by creating the short story “Bullet in the Brain”. The reason readers say that is because the story ends up being more profound that they would have thought when they read it from the beginning. It all starts off with a negative person who can’t keep his mouth shut. Then, that very same person is shot in the head having his last memories be
In conclusion, The Catcher in The Rye is quite the influential book that has become highly controversial. It could perhaps be a murder trigger to those suffering with obsessive mental disorders or other mental illnesses. For example, John Hinckley thought that after reading the book, assassinating Ronald Reagan would impress Jodie Foster. These men both thought that killing people was the right solution after reading the book. Even though their motives were different, killing seemed to be the best option for them in order to get what they
Male teenagers are more likely to get obsessed with relying on violence to release their repressed dissatisfaction and enhance their presence to further achieve self-satisfaction. This process is some sort of “dream-realizing” allows the marginalized people immerse in an illusion of overpowering others. Although Lars is clearly much more intelligent and sophisticated than his peers, he is still at a life stage when his emotion is highly unstable and has a strong eager to seek and to reach